Religious morality, secular morality and the search for moral relativism in the West

IF 0.4 4区 哲学
Gilvana de Jesus do Vale Campos, Alessandre Gomes de Lima, Stela Marcos de Almeida Neves Barbas
{"title":"Religious morality, secular morality and the search for moral relativism in the West","authors":"Gilvana de Jesus do Vale Campos, Alessandre Gomes de Lima, Stela Marcos de Almeida Neves Barbas","doi":"10.4067/s1726-569x2023000200147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work aims to characterize religious and secular moralities in the West from a critical-diachronic point of view, seeking to identify spaces that cover moral relativism in solving complex bioethics issues. Concerns such as the destination of surplus embryos, for instance, usually raise polarized positionings without consensual solutions. With the presuppositions introduced on western culture through several events, mainly the principle of laicity, the view of morality widened. This work is reflexive, meta-ethical, with an interdisciplinary approach. It is a national and international literature review regarding the main points on religious and secular morality. We concluded that the present moral overview certainly includes moral relativism based on essential morality, one which can be represented by moral strangers and moral friends.","PeriodicalId":49112,"journal":{"name":"Acta Bioethica","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Bioethica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s1726-569x2023000200147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work aims to characterize religious and secular moralities in the West from a critical-diachronic point of view, seeking to identify spaces that cover moral relativism in solving complex bioethics issues. Concerns such as the destination of surplus embryos, for instance, usually raise polarized positionings without consensual solutions. With the presuppositions introduced on western culture through several events, mainly the principle of laicity, the view of morality widened. This work is reflexive, meta-ethical, with an interdisciplinary approach. It is a national and international literature review regarding the main points on religious and secular morality. We concluded that the present moral overview certainly includes moral relativism based on essential morality, one which can be represented by moral strangers and moral friends.
宗教道德,世俗道德以及西方对道德相对主义的探索
这项工作旨在从批判的历时性角度描述西方的宗教和世俗道德,寻求在解决复杂的生命伦理学问题时识别涵盖道德相对主义的空间。例如,诸如多余胚胎的去向等问题,通常会在没有达成共识的解决方案的情况下引发两极分化的立场。随着西方文化的预设,主要是宽松原则的引入,道德观得到了拓展。这项工作是反思性的、元伦理的、跨学科的。这是一篇关于宗教和世俗道德要点的国内和国际文献综述。我们的结论是,当前的道德概观当然包含了以本质道德为基础的道德相对主义,它可以由道德陌生人和道德朋友来代表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Bioethica
Acta Bioethica 医学-卫生政策
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Acta Bioethica is a biannual publication by the Interdisciplinary Center for Studies in Bioethics of the University of Chile (ISSN 0717-5906, press edition, y 1726-569-X, electronic edition), which publishes in three languages: Spanish, English and Portuguese. Indexed in Science Citation Index (SCI), Scopus, Lilacs, SciELO y Latindex, and in database from several Institutions; it constitutes a pluralistic source of perspectives and an important tribune which accepts the contributions of authors compromised with the interdisciplinary study of ethical determinants and consequences of techno scientific research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信