DIMENSION OF POLITICAL SCIENCE IN RUSSIAN IDENTITY OF THE PAST AND PRESENT

N.V. ASONOV
{"title":"DIMENSION OF POLITICAL SCIENCE IN RUSSIAN IDENTITY OF THE PAST AND PRESENT","authors":"N.V. ASONOV","doi":"10.33693/2223-0092-2023-13-4-27-36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the specificity of political science, which requires placing power as the central category of politics and the political system when analyzing various social phenomena and processes, the author of the article presents their vision of Russian identity in the past and present. The aim of the study is to determine the main stages of the formation of Russian identity and reveal its specific features, reflecting the specificity of state power and the political system of the country as a unique civilization model of human development. Research Methods: The nature of this work is based on the use of systemic, functional, value-oriented, historical, and some other methods of political analysis, representing a harmonious combination of their general scientific and specific fundamental directions. Research Findings. In the course of the analysis conducted, the author arrived at several conclusions. According to them, at the state level, Russian identity had a completely sovereign character in two cases. The first instance was related to Moscow’s refusal to submit to the resolutions of the Florence Union Council, which preserved Russia as the only Orthodox state until Peter the Great. The second time our country became a civilization-state was in October 1917. The collapse of the Soviet Union positioned Russia as a peripheral element within the framework of the North Atlantic civilization and contributed to the establishment of a regime of “neo-Bonapartism” on its territory.","PeriodicalId":496479,"journal":{"name":"Socialʹno-političeskie nauki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialʹno-političeskie nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2023-13-4-27-36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the specificity of political science, which requires placing power as the central category of politics and the political system when analyzing various social phenomena and processes, the author of the article presents their vision of Russian identity in the past and present. The aim of the study is to determine the main stages of the formation of Russian identity and reveal its specific features, reflecting the specificity of state power and the political system of the country as a unique civilization model of human development. Research Methods: The nature of this work is based on the use of systemic, functional, value-oriented, historical, and some other methods of political analysis, representing a harmonious combination of their general scientific and specific fundamental directions. Research Findings. In the course of the analysis conducted, the author arrived at several conclusions. According to them, at the state level, Russian identity had a completely sovereign character in two cases. The first instance was related to Moscow’s refusal to submit to the resolutions of the Florence Union Council, which preserved Russia as the only Orthodox state until Peter the Great. The second time our country became a civilization-state was in October 1917. The collapse of the Soviet Union positioned Russia as a peripheral element within the framework of the North Atlantic civilization and contributed to the establishment of a regime of “neo-Bonapartism” on its territory.
政治科学的维度在俄罗斯身份的过去和现在
在分析各种社会现象和过程时,政治科学要求将权力作为政治和政治制度的中心范畴,基于这一特殊性,本文作者提出了他们对过去和现在的俄罗斯认同的看法。研究的目的是确定俄罗斯认同形成的主要阶段,揭示其具体特征,反映国家权力的特殊性和国家政治制度作为人类发展的独特文明模式。研究方法:本工作的性质是以系统、功能、价值导向、历史和其他一些政治分析方法为基础的,代表了它们的一般科学方向和具体基本方向的和谐结合。研究成果。在进行分析的过程中,作者得出了几个结论。根据他们的说法,在国家层面上,俄罗斯的身份在两种情况下具有完全的主权特征。第一起案件与莫斯科拒绝服从佛罗伦萨联盟委员会的决议有关,该决议保留了俄罗斯在彼得大帝之前唯一的东正教国家地位。我国第二次成为文明国家是在1917年10月。苏联的解体使俄罗斯成为北大西洋文明框架内的边缘元素,并促成了“新波拿巴主义”政权在其领土上的建立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信