Evaluating the Suitability of Online Courses using the ELECTRE Method

S Sahyunu, Jimmy Moedjahedy, Iwan Adhicandra, Yogasetya Suhanda, Usanto S, Robbi Rahim
{"title":"Evaluating the Suitability of Online Courses using the ELECTRE Method","authors":"S Sahyunu, Jimmy Moedjahedy, Iwan Adhicandra, Yogasetya Suhanda, Usanto S, Robbi Rahim","doi":"10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.3912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to explore the use of the Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (ELECTRE) method for selecting and evaluating online courses. The pairwise comparison method determined a set of criteria and weights, including course quality, instructor experience, accreditation, student engagement, flexibility, technical support, and cost. The study used a mixed-methods approach, which means it combines quantitative and qualitative data. The ELECTRE method was then applied to rank five online courses based on their suitability for the participants' needs and expectations. The concordance and discordance indices were calculated for each course, and the net flow was used to determine the ranking. The results showed that the ELECTRE method can be a useful tool for participants in choosing and evaluating online courses based on a set of tailored criteria and weights. Future research could investigate how the results of the ELECTRE method can be combined with other methods to enhance the accuracy and validity of the ranking. Overall, the ELECTRE method provides a useful framework for participants to decide which online course is best suited to their individual preferences and goals.","PeriodicalId":476198,"journal":{"name":"Al-Ishlah","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Ishlah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.3912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to explore the use of the Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (ELECTRE) method for selecting and evaluating online courses. The pairwise comparison method determined a set of criteria and weights, including course quality, instructor experience, accreditation, student engagement, flexibility, technical support, and cost. The study used a mixed-methods approach, which means it combines quantitative and qualitative data. The ELECTRE method was then applied to rank five online courses based on their suitability for the participants' needs and expectations. The concordance and discordance indices were calculated for each course, and the net flow was used to determine the ranking. The results showed that the ELECTRE method can be a useful tool for participants in choosing and evaluating online courses based on a set of tailored criteria and weights. Future research could investigate how the results of the ELECTRE method can be combined with other methods to enhance the accuracy and validity of the ranking. Overall, the ELECTRE method provides a useful framework for participants to decide which online course is best suited to their individual preferences and goals.
使用ELECTRE方法评估在线课程的适用性
本研究旨在探讨运用“淘汰与选择表达现实”(ELECTRE)方法进行网络课程的选择与评估。两两比较方法确定了一套标准和权重,包括课程质量、教师经验、认证、学生参与度、灵活性、技术支持和成本。该研究采用了混合方法,这意味着它结合了定量和定性数据。然后应用ELECTRE方法,根据课程是否适合参与者的需求和期望,对5门在线课程进行排名。计算每个球场的一致性和不一致性指数,并使用净流量来确定排名。结果表明,ELECTRE方法可以成为参与者根据一套量身定制的标准和权重选择和评估在线课程的有用工具。未来的研究可以探讨如何将ELECTRE方法的结果与其他方法相结合,以提高排名的准确性和有效性。总的来说,ELECTRE方法为参与者提供了一个有用的框架来决定哪个在线课程最适合他们的个人偏好和目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书