Children of AI: A Protocol for Managing the Born-Digital Ephemera Spawned by Generative AI Language Models

IF 4.6 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Publications Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.3390/publications11030045

Dirk H. R. Spennemann

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent public release of the generative AI language model ChatGPT has captured the public imagination and has resulted in a rapid uptake and widespread experimentation by the general public and academia alike. The number of academic publications focusing on the capabilities as well as practical and ethical implications of generative AI has been growing exponentially. One of the concerns with this unprecedented growth in scholarship related to generative AI, in particular, ChatGPT, is that, in most cases, the raw data, which is the text of the original ‘conversations,’ have not been made available to the audience of the papers and thus cannot be drawn on to assess the veracity of the arguments made and the conclusions drawn therefrom. This paper provides a protocol for the documentation and archiving of these raw data.

查看原文本刊更多论文

人工智能的孩子:一种管理由生成式人工智能语言模型生成的出生数字蜉蝣的协议

最近公开发布的生成人工智能语言模型ChatGPT吸引了公众的想象力，并导致了公众和学术界的快速吸收和广泛的实验。关注生成式人工智能的能力以及实践和伦理影响的学术出版物数量呈指数级增长。与生成式人工智能(尤其是ChatGPT)相关的学术研究出现了前所未有的增长，其中一个令人担忧的问题是，在大多数情况下，原始数据，即原始“对话”的文本，并没有提供给论文的读者，因此无法用来评估论点的真实性以及由此得出的结论。本文为这些原始数据的文档化和归档提供了一种协议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Publications Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

6.50

自引率

1.90%

发文量

审稿时长

11 weeks

期刊介绍： The scope of Publications includes: Theory and practice of scholarly communication Digitisation and innovations in scholarly publishing technologies Metadata, infrastructure, and linking the scholarly record Publishing policies and editorial/peer-review workflows Financial models for scholarly publishing Copyright, licensing and legal issues in publishing Research integrity and publication ethics Issues and best practices in the publication of non-traditional research outputs (e.g., data, software/code, protocols, data management plans, grant proposals, etc.) Issues in the transition to open access and open science Inclusion and participation of traditionally excluded actors Language issues in publication processes and products Traditional and alternative models of peer review Traditional and alternative means of assessment and evaluation of research and its impact, including bibliometrics and scientometrics The place of research libraries, scholarly societies, funders and others in scholarly communication.