Comparison of angular measurements in cephalometrics and photographs.

Atif Riaz, Ayesha Ashraf, None Shazia Ramzan, Samina Kadir, Farhan Ashraf, Nedal Iqbal
{"title":"Comparison of angular measurements in cephalometrics and photographs.","authors":"Atif Riaz, Ayesha Ashraf, None Shazia Ramzan, Samina Kadir, Farhan Ashraf, Nedal Iqbal","doi":"10.59058/jaimc.v21i3.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:
 Introduction: The evaluation of the facial profile is an important factor in any current orthodontic diagnosis and accurate treatment planning is dependent on it.
 Aims and Objectives: The aim and objective of the study is to find out differences in angular measurements between photographic and cephalometric measurements whether photographic measurements can be used in place of cephalometric measurements.
 Material & Methods: The study comprised 100 volunteers (50 males and 50 females) ranging in age from 12 to 16 years. The respondents were chosen at random throughout the sampling process. Cephalometric and photographic profile analysis was used, with angular measurements based on standard cephalometric and photographic records taken in natural head position in lateral view. Lateral cephalogram was used for cephalometric analysis and photograph taken in lateral view was used for evaluation. The study included four factors in total.
 Results: There was no significant difference in facial angular measurements between the cephalometric and photographic analysis.
 Conclusion: This study concluded that photographic measurements can be used in place of lateral cephalogram as there are negligible differences between them
 Keywords: Photographic analysis, Cephalometric analysis, Naso-labial angle, Naso-mental angle, Naso-frontal angle, Naso-facial angle","PeriodicalId":492993,"journal":{"name":"JAIMC Journal of Allama Iqbal Medical College","volume":"25 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAIMC Journal of Allama Iqbal Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59058/jaimc.v21i3.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The evaluation of the facial profile is an important factor in any current orthodontic diagnosis and accurate treatment planning is dependent on it. Aims and Objectives: The aim and objective of the study is to find out differences in angular measurements between photographic and cephalometric measurements whether photographic measurements can be used in place of cephalometric measurements. Material & Methods: The study comprised 100 volunteers (50 males and 50 females) ranging in age from 12 to 16 years. The respondents were chosen at random throughout the sampling process. Cephalometric and photographic profile analysis was used, with angular measurements based on standard cephalometric and photographic records taken in natural head position in lateral view. Lateral cephalogram was used for cephalometric analysis and photograph taken in lateral view was used for evaluation. The study included four factors in total. Results: There was no significant difference in facial angular measurements between the cephalometric and photographic analysis. Conclusion: This study concluded that photographic measurements can be used in place of lateral cephalogram as there are negligible differences between them Keywords: Photographic analysis, Cephalometric analysis, Naso-labial angle, Naso-mental angle, Naso-frontal angle, Naso-facial angle
头颅测量与照片中角度测量的比较。
文摘:& # x0D;简介:面部轮廓的评估是当前任何正畸诊断的重要因素,准确的治疗计划依赖于它。 目的和目的:本研究的目的和目的是找出摄影测量与头位测量在角度测量上的差异,是否可以用摄影测量代替头位测量。 材料,方法:研究包括100名志愿者(男50名,女50名),年龄从12岁到16岁不等。在整个抽样过程中,受访者是随机选择的。采用头颅测量和摄影侧位分析,根据标准头颅测量和摄影记录在自然头部位置侧位进行角度测量。头颅测量分析采用侧位摄片,评价采用侧位摄片。该研究共包括四个因素。 结果:头颅测量与照相分析在面部角度测量上无显著差异。 结论:本研究得出的结论是,由于摄影测量与侧位脑电图之间的差异可以忽略不计,因此可以替代侧位脑电图 关键词:摄影分析,头形分析,鼻唇角,鼻颏角,鼻额角,鼻面角
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信