“If only these conversations had happened in induction.” Influencing employee aspiration with action learning-led inductions in the Big Four

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Deborah Callaghan, Helen Collins
{"title":"“If only these conversations had happened in induction.” Influencing employee aspiration with action learning-led inductions in the Big Four","authors":"Deborah Callaghan, Helen Collins","doi":"10.1108/er-03-2023-0120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This paper explores employee experiences of induction in the Big Four accountancy firms to understand how induction influences new recruits' career aspirations. Design/methodology/approach Using Bourdieusian sociology, this article adopts an interpretivist multi-method approach through focus groups and semi-structured interviews with 28 newly appointed accounting professionals. The study defines newly appointed as those who have experienced induction within the last two years of their employment. Findings The study's findings challenge the authenticity of induction from a shared employee consensus. It cites contagious spin, regarding career progression opportunities espoused during induction, at odds with the reality of work, ultimately contributing towards unfulfilled employee aspiration. As current strategies suggest that the intersection between employee aspiration and employer provision in the accountancy profession, is too broad, this study argues for more collaborative inductions. In addition, it proposes that accountancy firms should re-evaluate their current strategies and co-construct more authentic inductions that benefit all stakeholders to develop a stronger psychological contract that positively influences employee aspiration. Research limitations/implications The paper posits action-learning as a solution to address employee aspiration in induction campaigns in the accountancy profession. Practical implications As aspiration is the genesis of motivation and engagement, this study’s findings suggest that the use of an action-learning ethos in induction activities may provide an opportunity to explore the complexities of employee socialisation and provide a voice to new recruits attempting to influence any tensions or disappointment that may arise, as unmet career aspirations emerge. Originality/value The paper posits action learning as a solution to address employee aspiration in induction campaigns in the accountancy profession.","PeriodicalId":47857,"journal":{"name":"Employee Relations","volume":"6 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/er-03-2023-0120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper explores employee experiences of induction in the Big Four accountancy firms to understand how induction influences new recruits' career aspirations. Design/methodology/approach Using Bourdieusian sociology, this article adopts an interpretivist multi-method approach through focus groups and semi-structured interviews with 28 newly appointed accounting professionals. The study defines newly appointed as those who have experienced induction within the last two years of their employment. Findings The study's findings challenge the authenticity of induction from a shared employee consensus. It cites contagious spin, regarding career progression opportunities espoused during induction, at odds with the reality of work, ultimately contributing towards unfulfilled employee aspiration. As current strategies suggest that the intersection between employee aspiration and employer provision in the accountancy profession, is too broad, this study argues for more collaborative inductions. In addition, it proposes that accountancy firms should re-evaluate their current strategies and co-construct more authentic inductions that benefit all stakeholders to develop a stronger psychological contract that positively influences employee aspiration. Research limitations/implications The paper posits action-learning as a solution to address employee aspiration in induction campaigns in the accountancy profession. Practical implications As aspiration is the genesis of motivation and engagement, this study’s findings suggest that the use of an action-learning ethos in induction activities may provide an opportunity to explore the complexities of employee socialisation and provide a voice to new recruits attempting to influence any tensions or disappointment that may arise, as unmet career aspirations emerge. Originality/value The paper posits action learning as a solution to address employee aspiration in induction campaigns in the accountancy profession.
“要是这些对话发生在归纳会上就好了。”四大企业中以行动学习为导向的导入影响员工期望
目的通过对四大会计师事务所员工入职经历的研究,了解入职对新员工职业抱负的影响。本文运用布尔迪厄社会学,通过焦点小组和对28名新上任的会计专业人员的半结构化访谈,采用了解释主义的多方法方法。该研究将新任命定义为那些在过去两年内经历过入职的人。该研究的发现对员工共识诱导的真实性提出了挑战。报告提到了传染性旋转,即在入职期间所支持的职业发展机会与工作现实不符,最终导致员工的愿望无法实现。由于目前的策略表明,在会计专业中,员工愿望和雇主提供之间的交集过于广泛,本研究主张更多的合作诱导。此外,本文建议会计师事务所应重新评估其现有战略,并共同构建更真实的诱导,使所有利益相关者受益,以建立更强的心理契约,积极影响员工的期望。研究局限/启示本文假设行动学习作为解决方案,以解决员工的愿望在入职活动在会计专业。由于抱负是动机和敬业度的起源,本研究的结果表明,在入职活动中使用行动学习精神可以提供一个探索员工社交复杂性的机会,并为新员工提供一个声音,试图影响任何可能出现的紧张或失望,因为未实现的职业抱负出现。原创性/价值本文将行动学习作为解决会计专业入职活动中员工愿望的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Employee Relations
Employee Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.80%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: ■Communication, participation and involvement ■Developments in collective bargaining ■Equal opportunities ■Health and safety ■HRM ■Industrial relations and employment protection law ■Industrial relations management and reform ■Organizational change and people ■Personnel and recruitment ■Quality of working life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信