Comparison between Percutaneous and Open Repair in AcuteTendon Achilles Rupture in Active Young Patients

Abd-ELHakeem Abdullah Farrag, Mohammed Nasr Akl, Aktham Amin Ahmed
{"title":"Comparison between Percutaneous and Open Repair in AcuteTendon Achilles Rupture in Active Young Patients","authors":"Abd-ELHakeem Abdullah Farrag, Mohammed Nasr Akl, Aktham Amin Ahmed","doi":"10.58675/2682-339x.1728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background; The Achilles tendon is the strongest and most often torn tendon in the human body and it is known that this rupture rate is rising in the third or fourth decade of life and it affects males more frequently. The majority of ruptures happen when doing sports. Aim and objectives; to compare between percutaneous and open repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture in active young patients who want to go back to resume activity following the repair. Patients and methods:30 participants were included in this prospective comparative research and randomly assigned to groups A and B. (each consists of 15 patients). While group A got percutaneous repair, group B had open repair. Hospitals affiliated with Al-Azhar University were the study's site (Al-Hussien University Hospital) as well as Zagazig General Hospital. The duration of the study was eighteen months. Result; No statistically substantial variation was detected between the two techniques as regard functional results (full weight-bearing, return to activity, muscle strength, and AOFAS score) at last follow-up. However, patients in the percutaneous group were able to achieve significantly larger degrees of ankle plantar flexion compared to the open group. Conclusion; at the long-term checkup, there is no variation between percutaneous and open Achilles tendon repairs. Although both groups had functionally equivalent results, open surgery of the Achilles tendon was linked with more wound problems.","PeriodicalId":474339,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar International Medical Journal (Print)","volume":"160 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar International Medical Journal (Print)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58675/2682-339x.1728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background; The Achilles tendon is the strongest and most often torn tendon in the human body and it is known that this rupture rate is rising in the third or fourth decade of life and it affects males more frequently. The majority of ruptures happen when doing sports. Aim and objectives; to compare between percutaneous and open repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture in active young patients who want to go back to resume activity following the repair. Patients and methods:30 participants were included in this prospective comparative research and randomly assigned to groups A and B. (each consists of 15 patients). While group A got percutaneous repair, group B had open repair. Hospitals affiliated with Al-Azhar University were the study's site (Al-Hussien University Hospital) as well as Zagazig General Hospital. The duration of the study was eighteen months. Result; No statistically substantial variation was detected between the two techniques as regard functional results (full weight-bearing, return to activity, muscle strength, and AOFAS score) at last follow-up. However, patients in the percutaneous group were able to achieve significantly larger degrees of ankle plantar flexion compared to the open group. Conclusion; at the long-term checkup, there is no variation between percutaneous and open Achilles tendon repairs. Although both groups had functionally equivalent results, open surgery of the Achilles tendon was linked with more wound problems.
经皮与开放式修复术治疗年轻活跃患者急性跟腱断裂的比较
背景;跟腱是人体中最强壮最常撕裂的肌腱,已知在生命的第三或第四个十年,这种断裂率上升,它更频繁地影响男性。大多数骨折是在运动时发生的。宗旨和目标;比较经皮和开放修复急性跟腱断裂的年轻活跃患者在修复后想要恢复活动的效果。患者与方法:本前瞻性比较研究共纳入30例受试者,随机分为A组和b组(每组15例)。A组经皮修复,B组开放修复。Al-Azhar大学附属医院(Al-Hussien大学医院)以及Zagazig总医院是该研究的地点。研究的持续时间为18个月。结果;在最后随访时,两种技术在功能结果(完全负重、恢复活动、肌肉力量和AOFAS评分)方面没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,与开放组相比,经皮组的患者能够实现更大程度的踝关节足底屈曲。结论;在长期检查中,经皮跟腱修复和开放跟腱修复之间没有差异。虽然两组在功能上的结果相同,但跟腱开腹手术与更多的伤口问题有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信