Data analytics methods to measure service quality: A systematic review

Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.3233/idt-230363
Georgia Gkioka, Thimios Bothos, Babis Magoutas, Gregoris Mentzas
{"title":"Data analytics methods to measure service quality: A systematic review","authors":"Georgia Gkioka, Thimios Bothos, Babis Magoutas, Gregoris Mentzas","doi":"10.3233/idt-230363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The volume of user generated content (UGC) regarding the quality of provided services has increased exponentially. Meanwhile, research on how to leverage this data using data-driven methods to systematically measure service quality is rather limited. Several works have employed Data Analytics (DA) techniques on UGC and shown that using such data to measure service quality is promising and efficient. The purpose of this study is to provide insights into the studies which use Data Analytics techniques to measure service quality in different sectors, identify gaps in the literature and propose future directions. This study performs a systematic literature review (SLR) of Data Analytics (DA) techniques to measure service quality in various sectors. This paper focuses on the type of data, the approaches used, and the evaluation techniques found in these studies. The study derives a new categorization of the Data Analytics methods used in measuring service quality, distinguishes the most used data sources and provides insights regarding methods and data sources used per industry. Finally, the paper concludes by identifying gaps in the literature and proposes future research directions aiming to provide practitioners and academia with guidance on implementing DA for service quality assessment, complementary to traditional survey-based methods.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/idt-230363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The volume of user generated content (UGC) regarding the quality of provided services has increased exponentially. Meanwhile, research on how to leverage this data using data-driven methods to systematically measure service quality is rather limited. Several works have employed Data Analytics (DA) techniques on UGC and shown that using such data to measure service quality is promising and efficient. The purpose of this study is to provide insights into the studies which use Data Analytics techniques to measure service quality in different sectors, identify gaps in the literature and propose future directions. This study performs a systematic literature review (SLR) of Data Analytics (DA) techniques to measure service quality in various sectors. This paper focuses on the type of data, the approaches used, and the evaluation techniques found in these studies. The study derives a new categorization of the Data Analytics methods used in measuring service quality, distinguishes the most used data sources and provides insights regarding methods and data sources used per industry. Finally, the paper concludes by identifying gaps in the literature and proposes future research directions aiming to provide practitioners and academia with guidance on implementing DA for service quality assessment, complementary to traditional survey-based methods.
分享
查看原文
测量服务质量的数据分析方法:系统回顾
与提供的服务质量相关的用户生成内容(UGC)的数量呈指数级增长。同时,如何利用这些数据,采用数据驱动的方法系统地衡量服务质量的研究相当有限。有几项研究使用了数据分析(DA)技术对用户原创内容进行分析,并表明使用这些数据来衡量服务质量是有希望和有效的。本研究的目的是为使用数据分析技术来衡量不同部门服务质量的研究提供见解,找出文献中的差距,并提出未来的方向。本研究对数据分析(DA)技术进行系统的文献回顾(SLR),以衡量各个部门的服务质量。本文重点介绍了这些研究中的数据类型、使用的方法和评估技术。该研究对用于衡量服务质量的数据分析方法进行了新的分类,区分了最常用的数据源,并提供了有关每个行业使用的方法和数据源的见解。最后,本文总结了文献中的不足之处,并提出了未来的研究方向,旨在为从业者和学术界提供在服务质量评估中实施数据分析的指导,补充传统的基于调查的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信