Creativity in Older Adults: Elucidating the Interactions between Cognitive Functions Underlying Creativity and the Role of Demographic Variables

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Stephanie Alcock, Aline Ferreira‐Correia, Kate Cockcroft
{"title":"Creativity in Older Adults: Elucidating the Interactions between Cognitive Functions Underlying Creativity and the Role of Demographic Variables","authors":"Stephanie Alcock, Aline Ferreira‐Correia, Kate Cockcroft","doi":"10.1002/jocb.614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Creativity involves generating novel and valuable ideas. While the importance of creative thinking is widely acknowledged, its cognitive basis is poorly understood, particularly in older adults. This study aimed to develop and test an explanatory model of creative thinking to elucidate its underlying cognitive functions in an elderly sample. The role of demographic variables, including age, multilingualism, socioeconomic status (SES), level of education, and gender in creative thinking was also investigated. One hundred and twenty‐five participants aged 65 years and above‐completed measures of divergent, convergent and associative thinking, as well as task‐switching, inhibition and fluid intelligence. Structural equation modeling (SEM) analyzed the relationships between these cognitive functions, and group differences assessed whether there were significant differences in the cognitive measures based on the demographic variables. Creative thinking appeared to entail the cooperation between divergent and convergent thinking, which both rely on associative thinking, suggesting an associative basis of creative thinking. Creative thinking involved fluid intelligence and task‐switching, but not inhibition, recasting it as a higher‐order function. This study supports the dual‐process account of creative thinking by demonstrating an associative basis and the role of executive functions. Differences among education and SES groups occurred for most cognitive functions analyzed. These findings inform prevailing theoretical frameworks of creative thinking.","PeriodicalId":39915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Behavior","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.614","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Creativity involves generating novel and valuable ideas. While the importance of creative thinking is widely acknowledged, its cognitive basis is poorly understood, particularly in older adults. This study aimed to develop and test an explanatory model of creative thinking to elucidate its underlying cognitive functions in an elderly sample. The role of demographic variables, including age, multilingualism, socioeconomic status (SES), level of education, and gender in creative thinking was also investigated. One hundred and twenty‐five participants aged 65 years and above‐completed measures of divergent, convergent and associative thinking, as well as task‐switching, inhibition and fluid intelligence. Structural equation modeling (SEM) analyzed the relationships between these cognitive functions, and group differences assessed whether there were significant differences in the cognitive measures based on the demographic variables. Creative thinking appeared to entail the cooperation between divergent and convergent thinking, which both rely on associative thinking, suggesting an associative basis of creative thinking. Creative thinking involved fluid intelligence and task‐switching, but not inhibition, recasting it as a higher‐order function. This study supports the dual‐process account of creative thinking by demonstrating an associative basis and the role of executive functions. Differences among education and SES groups occurred for most cognitive functions analyzed. These findings inform prevailing theoretical frameworks of creative thinking.
老年人的创造力:阐明潜在创造力的认知功能与人口变量作用之间的相互作用
创造力包括产生新颖而有价值的想法。虽然创造性思维的重要性得到了广泛认可,但人们对其认知基础却知之甚少,尤其是在老年人中。本研究旨在建立和检验一个创造性思维的解释模型,以阐明其在老年人样本中的潜在认知功能。人口统计变量,包括年龄、多语言、社会经济地位(SES)、教育水平和性别在创造性思维中的作用也进行了调查。125名年龄在65岁及以上的参与者完成了发散性、收敛性和联想性思维、任务转换、抑制和流体智力的测试。结构方程模型(SEM)分析了这些认知功能之间的关系,群体差异评估了基于人口统计学变量的认知测量是否存在显著差异。创造性思维似乎需要发散性思维和收敛性思维的合作,而发散性思维和收敛性思维都依赖于联想思维,这表明创造性思维的基础是联想。创造性思维涉及流动智力和任务转换,但不包括抑制,将其重新塑造为高阶函数。本研究通过展示联想基础和执行功能的作用来支持创造性思维的双过程解释。所分析的大多数认知功能在教育程度和社会经济地位组之间存在差异。这些发现为创造性思维的主流理论框架提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Creative Behavior
Journal of Creative Behavior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Creative Behavior is our quarterly academic journal citing the most current research in creative thinking. For nearly four decades JCB has been the benchmark scientific periodical in the field. It provides up to date cutting-edge ideas about creativity in education, psychology, business, arts and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信