Effects of a Summer Tutoring Program on Reading Achievement in Grades K-5

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
John Z. Strong, Blythe E. Anderson
{"title":"Effects of a Summer Tutoring Program on Reading Achievement in Grades K-5","authors":"John Z. Strong, Blythe E. Anderson","doi":"10.1080/10573569.2023.2266807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of an 18-day summer tutoring program in which graduate student tutors delivered 15 minutes of differentiated reading instruction (DRI) and a 30-minute interactive read-aloud (IRA) lesson each day. Students in grades K-5 (N = 179) attending a summer program at one urban elementary school completed a lesson-specific combination of pretest and posttest measures of letter-sound knowledge, decoding skills, oral reading fluency, and academic reading attitudes. Students were assigned to groups targeting phonemic awareness and word recognition (PAWR), word recognition and fluency (WRAF), fluency and comprehension (FAC), or vocabulary and comprehension (VAC) based on skill profiles. Paired-samples statistical tests were used to analyze pretest and posttest measures, and tutors were observed with a checklist to document implementation fidelity. Results indicated significant gains on specific subskill mastery measures of letter-sound knowledge for students in PAWR groups and decoding skills for students in PAWR and WRAF groups. Results were not significant for a curriculum-based measure of oral reading fluency for students in FAC groups and were significantly negative for students in VAC groups. There were no significant differences in gains based on instructional group size. There was no evidence of summer learning loss on academic reading attitudes. Tutors were able to implement DRI and IRA lessons with acceptable fidelity. These findings suggest that a summer tutoring program delivered by graduate students can improve targeted reading skills without negatively impacting reading attitudes. Disclosure statementThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the University at Buffalo Foundation.","PeriodicalId":51619,"journal":{"name":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2023.2266807","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of an 18-day summer tutoring program in which graduate student tutors delivered 15 minutes of differentiated reading instruction (DRI) and a 30-minute interactive read-aloud (IRA) lesson each day. Students in grades K-5 (N = 179) attending a summer program at one urban elementary school completed a lesson-specific combination of pretest and posttest measures of letter-sound knowledge, decoding skills, oral reading fluency, and academic reading attitudes. Students were assigned to groups targeting phonemic awareness and word recognition (PAWR), word recognition and fluency (WRAF), fluency and comprehension (FAC), or vocabulary and comprehension (VAC) based on skill profiles. Paired-samples statistical tests were used to analyze pretest and posttest measures, and tutors were observed with a checklist to document implementation fidelity. Results indicated significant gains on specific subskill mastery measures of letter-sound knowledge for students in PAWR groups and decoding skills for students in PAWR and WRAF groups. Results were not significant for a curriculum-based measure of oral reading fluency for students in FAC groups and were significantly negative for students in VAC groups. There were no significant differences in gains based on instructional group size. There was no evidence of summer learning loss on academic reading attitudes. Tutors were able to implement DRI and IRA lessons with acceptable fidelity. These findings suggest that a summer tutoring program delivered by graduate students can improve targeted reading skills without negatively impacting reading attitudes. Disclosure statementThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the University at Buffalo Foundation.
暑期辅导项目对小学五年级学生阅读成绩的影响
摘要本研究的目的是评估一个为期18天的暑期辅导计划的效果,在这个计划中,研究生导师每天提供15分钟的差异化阅读指导(DRI)和30分钟的互动朗读(IRA)课。在一所城市小学参加暑期项目的K-5年级学生(N = 179)完成了一项针对特定课程的测试前和测试后的组合测试,测试内容包括字母发音知识、解码技能、口语阅读流畅性和学术阅读态度。学生们被分配到音位意识和单词识别(PAWR)、单词识别和流利度(WRAF)、流利度和理解(FAC)或词汇和理解(VAC)等基于技能特征的小组。配对样本统计检验用于分析测试前和测试后的测量,并使用检查表观察导师以记录执行保真度。结果表明,PAWR组学生在字母发音知识的特定子技能掌握指标和PAWR组和WRAF组学生的解码技能方面有显著提高。FAC组学生的基于课程的口语阅读流畅性测量结果不显著,而VAC组学生的结果显著为负。根据教学小组的大小,没有显著的差异。没有证据表明暑期学习对学术阅读态度有影响。导师能够以可接受的保真度实施DRI和IRA课程。这些研究结果表明,研究生提供的暑期辅导计划可以提高针对性阅读技能,而不会对阅读态度产生负面影响。声明作者声明本研究不存在利益冲突。本研究得到了布法罗大学基金会的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信