Pakistan, China and the Structures of Debt Distress: Resisting Bretton Woods

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Farwa Sial, Juvaria Jafri, Abdul Khaliq
{"title":"Pakistan, China and the Structures of Debt Distress: Resisting Bretton Woods","authors":"Farwa Sial,&nbsp;Juvaria Jafri,&nbsp;Abdul Khaliq","doi":"10.1111/dech.12798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pakistan has received a total of 23 loan packages from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) between 1958 and 2023, and recurrent indebtedness has hindered structural transformation. Recent crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, surging commodity prices, Russia's invasion of Ukraine and diplomatic tensions between the United States and China, have exacerbated Pakistan's indebtedness. This debt has geopolitical importance given the rivalry between the US and China. Multilateral support for restructuring has been complicated by Pakistan's unique alliance with China through the China‒Pakistan Economic Corridor, pivotal to the Belt and Road Initiative. This analysis of Pakistan's debt crisis explores this complexity by considering the Pakistani government's attempts to resist the IMF, particularly between 2018 and 2022, when the potential of China as an alternative source of financial support looked increasingly viable. Unlike less critical political analyses on debt, which tend to be preoccupied with endogenous governance failures and fiscal profligacy, this article focuses on the external drivers of debt. In doing so, it highlights the role of a hostile international legal system, standard-setting arrangements, rating agencies and arbitrary charges that impose huge economic burdens and undermine financial stability, as well as the constraints embedded in the global investment and financial architecture that persistently limit Pakistan's policy space.</p>","PeriodicalId":48194,"journal":{"name":"Development and Change","volume":"54 5","pages":"1226-1263"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dech.12798","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dech.12798","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pakistan has received a total of 23 loan packages from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) between 1958 and 2023, and recurrent indebtedness has hindered structural transformation. Recent crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, surging commodity prices, Russia's invasion of Ukraine and diplomatic tensions between the United States and China, have exacerbated Pakistan's indebtedness. This debt has geopolitical importance given the rivalry between the US and China. Multilateral support for restructuring has been complicated by Pakistan's unique alliance with China through the China‒Pakistan Economic Corridor, pivotal to the Belt and Road Initiative. This analysis of Pakistan's debt crisis explores this complexity by considering the Pakistani government's attempts to resist the IMF, particularly between 2018 and 2022, when the potential of China as an alternative source of financial support looked increasingly viable. Unlike less critical political analyses on debt, which tend to be preoccupied with endogenous governance failures and fiscal profligacy, this article focuses on the external drivers of debt. In doing so, it highlights the role of a hostile international legal system, standard-setting arrangements, rating agencies and arbitrary charges that impose huge economic burdens and undermine financial stability, as well as the constraints embedded in the global investment and financial architecture that persistently limit Pakistan's policy space.

Abstract Image

巴基斯坦、中国和债务危机的结构:抵制布雷顿森林体系
巴基斯坦在1958年至2023年期间共从国际货币基金组织(基金组织)获得了23笔贷款,经常性债务阻碍了结构转型。最近的危机,如COVID-19大流行、大宗商品价格飙升、俄罗斯入侵乌克兰以及美国和中国之间的外交紧张局势,加剧了巴基斯坦的债务。鉴于美国和中国之间的竞争,这笔债务具有地缘政治重要性。巴基斯坦通过中巴经济走廊与中国建立了独特的联盟,这对“一带一路”倡议至关重要,这使得多边支持重组变得更加复杂。本文对巴基斯坦债务危机的分析探讨了这种复杂性,考虑了巴基斯坦政府抵制IMF的努力,特别是在2018年至2022年期间,当时中国作为另一种财政支持来源的潜力似乎越来越可行。与不那么关键的债务政治分析不同,这些分析往往专注于内生治理失败和财政挥霍,本文侧重于债务的外部驱动因素。在这样做的过程中,它突出了敌对的国际法律体系、标准制定安排、评级机构和任意收费的作用,这些都造成了巨大的经济负担,破坏了金融稳定,以及全球投资和金融架构中嵌入的制约因素,这些制约因素持续限制了巴基斯坦的政策空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Development and Change
Development and Change DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Development and Change is essential reading for anyone interested in development studies and social change. It publishes articles from a wide range of authors, both well-established specialists and young scholars, and is an important resource for: - social science faculties and research institutions - international development agencies and NGOs - graduate teachers and researchers - all those with a serious interest in the dynamics of development, from reflective activists to analytical practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信