Entrustment Decision Making in the Intensive Care Unit: It’s About More Than the Learner

IF 1.7 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Megan Conroy, Jennifer McCallister, Jillian Gustin
{"title":"Entrustment Decision Making in the Intensive Care Unit: It’s About More Than the Learner","authors":"Megan Conroy, Jennifer McCallister, Jillian Gustin","doi":"10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0060oc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The provision of graded supervision affording progressive autonomy is fundamental to the progression of a medical learner toward competency for independent practice; the decision of how much supervision versus autonomy to provide a trainee in the execution of clinical care constitutes an entrustment decision. Despite entrustment decision making occurring both daily in practice and summatively at points of matriculation through stages of medical training, the factors influencing entrustment decisions remain poorly understood across clinical contexts. Objective: This study was designed to explore the central research question: How are entrustment decisions made in the medical intensive care unit (ICU)? Methods: This qualitative case study used semistructured interviews with attending pulmonary and critical care physicians in the medical ICU at a major midwestern medical center to explore the entrustment decision-making process as it was enacted in the clinical environment. Results: Five major themes emerged from the data: 1) task, circumstance, and trainee factors contribute to entrustment decision making; 2) ad hoc entrustment decisions are enacted by supervisors with a consideration of the care team as a unit, not only an individual; 3) autonomy does not only arise out of entrustment, but outcomes of prior autonomous actions by the trainee inform the intention to entrust; 4) entrustment decision making includes a social process of back-and-forth akin to negotiation; and 5) entrustment is a learned skill. Conclusion: The process of entrustment decision making in the ICU is more complex than prior frameworks have captured; a model with more complete incorporation of the factors that influence entrustment in the ICU is presented. It is not clear how often ad hoc entrustment decisions in clinical practice are primarily driven by factors pertaining directly to trainee competence, which carries implications in the use of entrustment for assessment.","PeriodicalId":72330,"journal":{"name":"ATS scholar","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATS scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0060oc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The provision of graded supervision affording progressive autonomy is fundamental to the progression of a medical learner toward competency for independent practice; the decision of how much supervision versus autonomy to provide a trainee in the execution of clinical care constitutes an entrustment decision. Despite entrustment decision making occurring both daily in practice and summatively at points of matriculation through stages of medical training, the factors influencing entrustment decisions remain poorly understood across clinical contexts. Objective: This study was designed to explore the central research question: How are entrustment decisions made in the medical intensive care unit (ICU)? Methods: This qualitative case study used semistructured interviews with attending pulmonary and critical care physicians in the medical ICU at a major midwestern medical center to explore the entrustment decision-making process as it was enacted in the clinical environment. Results: Five major themes emerged from the data: 1) task, circumstance, and trainee factors contribute to entrustment decision making; 2) ad hoc entrustment decisions are enacted by supervisors with a consideration of the care team as a unit, not only an individual; 3) autonomy does not only arise out of entrustment, but outcomes of prior autonomous actions by the trainee inform the intention to entrust; 4) entrustment decision making includes a social process of back-and-forth akin to negotiation; and 5) entrustment is a learned skill. Conclusion: The process of entrustment decision making in the ICU is more complex than prior frameworks have captured; a model with more complete incorporation of the factors that influence entrustment in the ICU is presented. It is not clear how often ad hoc entrustment decisions in clinical practice are primarily driven by factors pertaining directly to trainee competence, which carries implications in the use of entrustment for assessment.
重症监护病房的委托决策:不仅仅是学习者的问题
背景:提供逐步自主的分级监督是医学学习者向独立实践能力发展的基础;在临床护理的执行过程中,为实习生提供多少监督与自主权的决定构成了委托决策。尽管委托决策每天都在实践中发生,并且在医学培训阶段的入学阶段总结,但在临床环境中,影响委托决策的因素仍然知之甚少。目的:本研究旨在探讨中心研究问题:医疗重症监护病房(ICU)的委托决策是如何制定的?方法:本定性案例研究采用半结构化访谈的方法,对中西部一家主要医疗中心内科重症监护室的肺病和重症监护主治医师进行访谈,探讨在临床环境中制定委托决策过程。结果:从数据中得出五大主题:1)任务、环境和学员因素对委托决策有影响;2)临时委托决策由主管制定,将护理团队作为一个单位,而不仅仅是一个个体;3)自主并不仅仅是委托的结果,而是受训者之前自主行为的结果告知了委托的意图;(4)委托决策包含了一个类似于谈判的来回的社会过程;委托是一种后天习得的技能。结论:ICU的委托决策过程比现有框架所描述的更为复杂;提出了一个更完整地纳入影响ICU委托因素的模型。目前尚不清楚,临床实践中的临时委托决定主要是由与实习生能力直接相关的因素驱动的,这对委托评估的使用有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信