Systematic Review of Accelerometer Responsiveness to Change for Measuring Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, or Sleep

Kimberly A. Clevenger, Alexander H.K. Montoye
{"title":"Systematic Review of Accelerometer Responsiveness to Change for Measuring Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, or Sleep","authors":"Kimberly A. Clevenger, Alexander H.K. Montoye","doi":"10.1123/jmpb.2023-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measurement of 24-hr movement behaviors is important for assessing adherence to guidelines, participation trends over time, group differences, and whether health-promoting interventions are successful. For a measurement tool to be useful, it must be valid, reliable, and able to detect change, the latter being a measurement property called responsiveness, sensitivity to change, or longitudinal validity. We systematically reviewed literature on the responsiveness of accelerometers to detect change in 24-hr movement behaviors. Databases (PubMed, Scopus, and EBSCOHost) were searched for peer-reviewed papers published in English between 1998 and 2023. Quality/risk of bias was assessed using a customized tool. This study is registered at https://osf.io/qrn8a . Twenty-six papers met the inclusion/exclusion criteria with an overall sample of 1,939 participants. Narrative synthesis was used. Most studies focused on adults ( n = 21), and almost half ( n = 12) included individuals with specific medical conditions. Studies primarily took place in free-living settings ( n = 21) and used research-grade accelerometers ( n = 24) worn on the hip ( n = 18), thigh ( n = 7), or wrist ( n = 9). Outcomes included physical activity ( n = 19), sedentary time/behavior ( n = 12), or sleep ( n = 2) and were calculated using proprietary formulas (e.g., Fitbit algorithm), cut points, and/or count-based methods. Most studies calculated responsiveness by comparing before versus after an intervention ( n = 16). Six studies included a criterion measure to confirm that changes occurred. Limited research is available on the responsiveness of accelerometers for detecting change in 24-hr movement behaviors, particularly in youth populations, for sleep outcomes, and for commercial and thigh- or wrist-worn devices. Lack of a criterion measure precludes conclusions about the responsiveness even in more frequently studied outcomes/populations.","PeriodicalId":73572,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jmpb.2023-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurement of 24-hr movement behaviors is important for assessing adherence to guidelines, participation trends over time, group differences, and whether health-promoting interventions are successful. For a measurement tool to be useful, it must be valid, reliable, and able to detect change, the latter being a measurement property called responsiveness, sensitivity to change, or longitudinal validity. We systematically reviewed literature on the responsiveness of accelerometers to detect change in 24-hr movement behaviors. Databases (PubMed, Scopus, and EBSCOHost) were searched for peer-reviewed papers published in English between 1998 and 2023. Quality/risk of bias was assessed using a customized tool. This study is registered at https://osf.io/qrn8a . Twenty-six papers met the inclusion/exclusion criteria with an overall sample of 1,939 participants. Narrative synthesis was used. Most studies focused on adults ( n = 21), and almost half ( n = 12) included individuals with specific medical conditions. Studies primarily took place in free-living settings ( n = 21) and used research-grade accelerometers ( n = 24) worn on the hip ( n = 18), thigh ( n = 7), or wrist ( n = 9). Outcomes included physical activity ( n = 19), sedentary time/behavior ( n = 12), or sleep ( n = 2) and were calculated using proprietary formulas (e.g., Fitbit algorithm), cut points, and/or count-based methods. Most studies calculated responsiveness by comparing before versus after an intervention ( n = 16). Six studies included a criterion measure to confirm that changes occurred. Limited research is available on the responsiveness of accelerometers for detecting change in 24-hr movement behaviors, particularly in youth populations, for sleep outcomes, and for commercial and thigh- or wrist-worn devices. Lack of a criterion measure precludes conclusions about the responsiveness even in more frequently studied outcomes/populations.
测量身体活动、久坐行为或睡眠的加速度计响应变化的系统综述
测量24小时运动行为对于评估指南的遵守情况、随时间推移的参与趋势、群体差异以及促进健康的干预措施是否成功非常重要。对于有用的测量工具,它必须是有效的、可靠的,并且能够检测到变化,后者是一种称为响应性、对变化的敏感性或纵向有效性的测量属性。我们系统地回顾了有关加速计响应性的文献,以检测24小时运动行为的变化。检索了1998年至2023年间发表的英文同行评议论文(PubMed、Scopus和EBSCOHost)。使用定制工具评估偏倚的质量/风险。本研究注册网址为https://osf.io/qrn8a。26篇论文符合纳入/排除标准,总共有1939名参与者。采用了叙事综合。大多数研究集中在成年人身上(n = 21),几乎一半(n = 12)包括有特殊医疗条件的个体。研究主要在自由生活环境中进行(n = 21),并使用了佩戴在臀部(n = 18)、大腿(n = 7)或手腕(n = 9)的研究级加速度计(n = 24)。结果包括体力活动(n = 19)、久坐时间/行为(n = 12)或睡眠(n = 2),并使用专有公式(例如Fitbit算法)、切割点和/或基于计数的方法进行计算。大多数研究通过比较干预前后的反应性来计算反应性(n = 16)。六项研究包括一个标准测量,以确认发生的变化。对于加速计用于检测24小时运动行为变化的响应性,特别是在年轻人群体中,对于睡眠结果,以及商用和大腿或手腕上佩戴的设备,研究有限。缺乏标准测量,即使在更频繁研究的结果/人群中,也无法得出反应性的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信