Using multiple plant functional types to assess response to prescribed burn season in Mediterranean-climate vegetation

IF 2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Alexandria M. Thomsen, Richard J. P. Davies, Mark K. J. Ooi
{"title":"Using multiple plant functional types to assess response to prescribed burn season in Mediterranean-climate vegetation","authors":"Alexandria M. Thomsen,&nbsp;Richard J. P. Davies,&nbsp;Mark K. J. Ooi","doi":"10.1111/avsc.12750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Questions</h3>\n \n <p>Prescribed burning is a key tool for managing vegetation for conservation in fire-prone ecosystems around the world. Plants are adapted to particular fire regimes, made up of components including fire frequency and seasonality. However, burning outside historical regime parameters may impact species recovery and subsequent community assembly. We asked (i) do shrub species respond differently to spring and autumn fires, the primary times for prescribed burns in many temperate regions and (ii) does the use of novel functional groups, based on seed and seed bank traits, allow more robust predictions of response to shifting fire season?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Mediterranean-climate southern Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We surveyed 10 common shrub species to examine the impact of fire season on mortality, resprout vigour and seedling recruitment, using three functional groups: fire response (obligate seeder vs resprouter), seed storage (soil- vs canopy-stored), and seed dormancy class [physical (PY) vs morphophysiological (MPD)]. We also analysed individual species to assess species-specific responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Obligate seeding and canopy seed-storing functional groups were negatively impacted by spring burns, with recruitment levels one third of that observed after autumn burns. For species with soil-stored seed banks, impacts of burn season were mediated by seed dormancy class, with PY species performing worse than their seasonally emerging MPD counterparts. Some individual species responded in stark contrast to others within their functional group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Functional groups widely used to predict recovery, usually based on resprouting response and fire frequency, may not robustly predict responses to some fire factors, such as fire season. Our results highlight the importance that fire seasonality has on species response and potentially subsequent community assembly. We propose utilising multiple functional groups when assessing risk from shifting fire seasonality or when exploring impacts of multiple fire regime elements, and species-focused studies when managing species at high risk of extinction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55494,"journal":{"name":"Applied Vegetation Science","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/avsc.12750","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avsc.12750","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Questions

Prescribed burning is a key tool for managing vegetation for conservation in fire-prone ecosystems around the world. Plants are adapted to particular fire regimes, made up of components including fire frequency and seasonality. However, burning outside historical regime parameters may impact species recovery and subsequent community assembly. We asked (i) do shrub species respond differently to spring and autumn fires, the primary times for prescribed burns in many temperate regions and (ii) does the use of novel functional groups, based on seed and seed bank traits, allow more robust predictions of response to shifting fire season?

Location

Mediterranean-climate southern Australia.

Methods

We surveyed 10 common shrub species to examine the impact of fire season on mortality, resprout vigour and seedling recruitment, using three functional groups: fire response (obligate seeder vs resprouter), seed storage (soil- vs canopy-stored), and seed dormancy class [physical (PY) vs morphophysiological (MPD)]. We also analysed individual species to assess species-specific responses.

Results

Obligate seeding and canopy seed-storing functional groups were negatively impacted by spring burns, with recruitment levels one third of that observed after autumn burns. For species with soil-stored seed banks, impacts of burn season were mediated by seed dormancy class, with PY species performing worse than their seasonally emerging MPD counterparts. Some individual species responded in stark contrast to others within their functional group.

Conclusion

Functional groups widely used to predict recovery, usually based on resprouting response and fire frequency, may not robustly predict responses to some fire factors, such as fire season. Our results highlight the importance that fire seasonality has on species response and potentially subsequent community assembly. We propose utilising multiple functional groups when assessing risk from shifting fire seasonality or when exploring impacts of multiple fire regime elements, and species-focused studies when managing species at high risk of extinction.

Abstract Image

利用多种植物功能类型评估地中海气候植被对规定燃烧季节的响应
在世界各地的火灾易发生态系统中,规定燃烧是管理植被保护的关键工具。植物适应特定的火灾制度,包括火灾频率和季节性组成部分。然而,在历史状态参数之外的燃烧可能会影响物种的恢复和随后的群落聚集。我们提出了以下问题:(1)灌木物种对春季和秋季火灾的反应是否不同,春季和秋季是许多温带地区规定燃烧的主要时间;(2)基于种子和种子库特征的新型官能团的使用是否能够更可靠地预测对火灾季节变化的反应?地理位置:地中海气候,澳大利亚南部。方法以10种常见灌木为研究对象,研究了火灾季节对其死亡率、繁殖活力和幼苗招募的影响,利用3个功能群:火灾响应(专种播种vs呼吸繁殖)、种子储存(土壤vs冠层储存)和种子休眠类别[物理(PY) vs形态生理(MPD)]。我们还分析了单个物种,以评估物种特异性反应。结果春季烧伤对种子和冠层储种官能团的影响为负,其招募水平为秋季烧伤的三分之一。对于具有土壤储存种子库的物种,燃烧季节的影响是由种子休眠类别介导的,PY物种的表现不如季节性出现的MPD物种。一些个体物种的反应与其功能群中的其他物种形成鲜明对比。结论常用的预测恢复的官能团,通常基于再喷反应和火灾频率,可能不能准确预测某些火灾因素(如火灾季节)的反应。我们的研究结果强调了火灾季节性对物种反应和潜在的后续群落聚集的重要性。我们建议在评估火灾季节性变化的风险或探索多种火灾制度要素的影响时利用多个官能团,并在管理濒临灭绝的物种时进行以物种为重点的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Vegetation Science
Applied Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.70%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Vegetation Science focuses on community-level topics relevant to human interaction with vegetation, including global change, nature conservation, nature management, restoration of plant communities and of natural habitats, and the planning of semi-natural and urban landscapes. Vegetation survey, modelling and remote-sensing applications are welcome. Papers on vegetation science which do not fit to this scope (do not have an applied aspect and are not vegetation survey) should be directed to our associate journal, the Journal of Vegetation Science. Both journals publish papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信