Detecting Multidimensional DIF in Polytomous Items with IRT Methods and Estimation Approaches

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Güler Yavuz Temel
{"title":"Detecting Multidimensional DIF in Polytomous Items with IRT Methods and Estimation Approaches","authors":"Güler Yavuz Temel","doi":"10.1111/jedm.12377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this study was to investigate multidimensional DIF with a simple and nonsimple structure in the context of multidimensional Graded Response Model (MGRM). This study examined and compared the performance of the IRT-LR and Wald test using MML-EM and MHRM estimation approaches with different test factors and test structures in simulation studies and applying real data sets. When the test structure included two dimensions, the IRT-LR (MML-EM) generally performed better than the Wald test and provided higher power rates. If the test included three dimensions, the methods provided similar performance in DIF detection. In contrast to these results, when the number of dimensions in the test was four, MML-EM estimation completely lost precision in estimating the nonuniform DIF, even with large sample sizes. The Wald with MHRM estimation approaches outperformed the Wald test (MML-EM) and IRT-LR (MML-EM). The Wald test had higher power rate and acceptable type I error rates for nonuniform DIF with the MHRM estimation approach.The small and/or unbalanced sample sizes, small DIF magnitudes, unequal ability distributions between groups, number of dimensions, estimation methods and test structure were evaluated as important test factors for detecting multidimensional DIF.</p>","PeriodicalId":47871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Measurement","volume":"61 1","pages":"69-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jedm.12377","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate multidimensional DIF with a simple and nonsimple structure in the context of multidimensional Graded Response Model (MGRM). This study examined and compared the performance of the IRT-LR and Wald test using MML-EM and MHRM estimation approaches with different test factors and test structures in simulation studies and applying real data sets. When the test structure included two dimensions, the IRT-LR (MML-EM) generally performed better than the Wald test and provided higher power rates. If the test included three dimensions, the methods provided similar performance in DIF detection. In contrast to these results, when the number of dimensions in the test was four, MML-EM estimation completely lost precision in estimating the nonuniform DIF, even with large sample sizes. The Wald with MHRM estimation approaches outperformed the Wald test (MML-EM) and IRT-LR (MML-EM). The Wald test had higher power rate and acceptable type I error rates for nonuniform DIF with the MHRM estimation approach.The small and/or unbalanced sample sizes, small DIF magnitudes, unequal ability distributions between groups, number of dimensions, estimation methods and test structure were evaluated as important test factors for detecting multidimensional DIF.

用 IRT 方法和估计方法检测多同调项目中的多维 DIF
本研究的目的是在多维分级反应模型(MGRM)的背景下研究具有简单和非简单结构的多维 DIF。本研究在模拟研究和应用真实数据集时,使用 MML-EM 和 MHRM 估算方法,检验并比较了不同测试因子和测试结构下 IRT-LR 和 Wald 检验的性能。当测试结构包括两个维度时,IRT-LR(MML-EM)的性能通常优于 Wald 检验,并提供更高的功率率。如果测试包括三个维度,这两种方法的 DIF 检测性能相似。与这些结果相反,当测试的维度数为四个时,MML-EM 估计在估计非均匀 DIF 方面完全失去了精确性,即使样本量很大也是如此。采用 MML-EM 估计方法的 Wald 检验结果优于 Wald 检验(MML-EM)和 IRT-LR (MML-EM)。小样本量和/或不平衡样本量、小 DIF 量级、组间能力分布不均、维度数量、估计方法和测试结构被评估为检测多维 DIF 的重要测试因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Journal of Educational Measurement (JEM) publishes original measurement research, provides reviews of measurement publications, and reports on innovative measurement applications. The topics addressed will interest those concerned with the practice of measurement in field settings, as well as be of interest to measurement theorists. In addition to presenting new contributions to measurement theory and practice, JEM also serves as a vehicle for improving educational measurement applications in a variety of settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信