Development and validation of diagnostic criteria for elderly atopic dermatitis

Shang-Shang Wang, Zheng Li, Chao-Ying Gu, Hui-Bin Yin, Yue-Meng Wu, Xu Yao, Wei Li
{"title":"Development and validation of diagnostic criteria for elderly atopic dermatitis","authors":"Shang-Shang Wang, Zheng Li, Chao-Ying Gu, Hui-Bin Yin, Yue-Meng Wu, Xu Yao, Wei Li","doi":"10.1097/jd9.0000000000000349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Elderly atopic dermatitis (AD) is a newly identified subtype of AD. Whether specific diagnostic criteria are needed for elderly AD has been debated. This study aimed to propose diagnostic criteria for elderly AD and evaluate the sensitivity. Methods: A hospital-based study was conducted. We screened the clinical features of 1312 patients with AD of different ages in one cohort and proposed a set of diagnostic criteria for elderly AD. The criteria were then validated in another cohort of 223 patients clinically diagnosed with elderly AD by dermatologists specialized in AD to examine the diagnostic sensitivity compared with other criteria by chi-square test. Results: Based on the patients’ clinical features, a set of diagnostic criteria for elderly AD were proposed. The new diagnostic criteria showed significantly higher sensitivity than the classical diagnostic criteria (P<0.001), especially for mild and moderate AD (P<0.001). Of all 223 patients with elderly AD, 93.3% fulfilled our criteria, while only 43.5%, 65.5%, and 52.0% fulfilled the Hanifin and Rajka criteria, the Japanese Dermatology Academy criteria, and the United Kingdom Working Party criteria, respectively. Conclusion: The newly proposed criteria for elderly AD yielded high diagnostic sensitivity, particularly for mild and moderate AD.","PeriodicalId":73440,"journal":{"name":"International journal of dermatology and venereology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of dermatology and venereology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jd9.0000000000000349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Elderly atopic dermatitis (AD) is a newly identified subtype of AD. Whether specific diagnostic criteria are needed for elderly AD has been debated. This study aimed to propose diagnostic criteria for elderly AD and evaluate the sensitivity. Methods: A hospital-based study was conducted. We screened the clinical features of 1312 patients with AD of different ages in one cohort and proposed a set of diagnostic criteria for elderly AD. The criteria were then validated in another cohort of 223 patients clinically diagnosed with elderly AD by dermatologists specialized in AD to examine the diagnostic sensitivity compared with other criteria by chi-square test. Results: Based on the patients’ clinical features, a set of diagnostic criteria for elderly AD were proposed. The new diagnostic criteria showed significantly higher sensitivity than the classical diagnostic criteria (P<0.001), especially for mild and moderate AD (P<0.001). Of all 223 patients with elderly AD, 93.3% fulfilled our criteria, while only 43.5%, 65.5%, and 52.0% fulfilled the Hanifin and Rajka criteria, the Japanese Dermatology Academy criteria, and the United Kingdom Working Party criteria, respectively. Conclusion: The newly proposed criteria for elderly AD yielded high diagnostic sensitivity, particularly for mild and moderate AD.
老年特应性皮炎诊断标准的制定与验证
目的:老年特应性皮炎(AD)是一种新发现的AD亚型。老年AD是否需要特定的诊断标准一直存在争议。本研究旨在提出老年AD的诊断标准并评价其敏感性。方法:以医院为基础进行研究。我们在一个队列中筛选了1312名不同年龄的AD患者的临床特征,提出了一套老年AD的诊断标准。然后由专门从事AD的皮肤科医生在另一组223例临床诊断为老年AD的患者中验证该标准,通过卡方检验比较其与其他标准的诊断敏感性。结果:根据患者的临床特点,提出了一套老年AD的诊断标准。新诊断标准的敏感性明显高于经典诊断标准(P<0.001),特别是对轻度和中度AD (P<0.001)。在所有223例老年AD患者中,93.3%符合我们的标准,而分别只有43.5%、65.5%和52.0%符合Hanifin和Rajka标准、日本皮肤病学会标准和英国工作组标准。结论:新提出的老年AD诊断标准具有较高的诊断敏感性,特别是对轻度和中度AD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信