Data Access under the Draft Data Act, Competition Law and the DMA: Opening the Data Treasures for Cowmpetition and Innovation?

Heike Schweitzer, Axel Metzger
{"title":"Data Access under the Draft Data Act, Competition Law and the DMA: Opening the Data Treasures for Cowmpetition and Innovation?","authors":"Heike Schweitzer, Axel Metzger","doi":"10.1093/grurint/ikad012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the ongoing transformation from ‘industrial capitalism’ towards an ‘informational capitalism’, one of the core challenges is for the law to design and enforce an appropriate legal framework for access to and use of data. Focusing on access to data generated by the use of products or online services (product and online services usage data), the aim of this paper is to describe and systematize the core elements of this legal framework in the making and to provide some guidance on how it could be further developed. Access by the users of products or online services to the individual-level data that their usage generates must be distinguished from access to bundled individual-level and aggregated data by third parties. With regard to data co-generators’ access to individual-level product usage data, the Draft Data Act proposes to create new rights to access that will become part of a new private law infrastructure of data rights. These access rights are granted independently of whether the data holder is dominant. With regard to data co-generators’ access to individual-level services usage data, the Digital Markets Act (DMA) establishes rights of access only vis-à-vis gatekeepers within the meaning of the DMA. Third-party undertakings who request access to bundled individual-level or aggregated data can, as of now, only base their claim on Art. 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and – in the case of search data – on Art. 6(11) DMA. A regulatory approach has been proposed as an alternative. This paper strives to systematize this hodgepodge of approaches and discern the broader principles that can guide the legislature in creating and fleshing out the legal framework for data. Ideally, markets for bundled individual level or aggregated data will emerge based on the rights of data co-generators to access individual-level data. For this to happen, data intermediaries will have to play a larger role and succeed in bundling and marketing such data.","PeriodicalId":487734,"journal":{"name":"GRUR international","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GRUR international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the ongoing transformation from ‘industrial capitalism’ towards an ‘informational capitalism’, one of the core challenges is for the law to design and enforce an appropriate legal framework for access to and use of data. Focusing on access to data generated by the use of products or online services (product and online services usage data), the aim of this paper is to describe and systematize the core elements of this legal framework in the making and to provide some guidance on how it could be further developed. Access by the users of products or online services to the individual-level data that their usage generates must be distinguished from access to bundled individual-level and aggregated data by third parties. With regard to data co-generators’ access to individual-level product usage data, the Draft Data Act proposes to create new rights to access that will become part of a new private law infrastructure of data rights. These access rights are granted independently of whether the data holder is dominant. With regard to data co-generators’ access to individual-level services usage data, the Digital Markets Act (DMA) establishes rights of access only vis-à-vis gatekeepers within the meaning of the DMA. Third-party undertakings who request access to bundled individual-level or aggregated data can, as of now, only base their claim on Art. 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and – in the case of search data – on Art. 6(11) DMA. A regulatory approach has been proposed as an alternative. This paper strives to systematize this hodgepodge of approaches and discern the broader principles that can guide the legislature in creating and fleshing out the legal framework for data. Ideally, markets for bundled individual level or aggregated data will emerge based on the rights of data co-generators to access individual-level data. For this to happen, data intermediaries will have to play a larger role and succeed in bundling and marketing such data.
数据法草案、竞争法和DMA下的数据访问:为竞争和创新打开数据宝藏?
在从“工业资本主义”到“信息资本主义”的持续转型中,法律面临的核心挑战之一是设计和执行一个适当的法律框架来访问和使用数据。本文的重点是获取使用产品或在线服务产生的数据(产品和在线服务使用数据),目的是描述和系统化这一法律框架的核心要素,并就如何进一步发展提供一些指导。产品或在线服务的用户对其使用产生的个人级数据的访问必须与第三方对捆绑的个人级和聚合数据的访问区分开来。关于数据共同生成者对个人层面产品使用数据的访问,数据法草案建议创建新的访问权利,这将成为数据权利的新私法基础设施的一部分。这些访问权的授予与数据持有者是否占主导地位无关。关于数据共同生成者对个人级服务使用数据的访问,《数字市场法》(DMA)规定了仅对DMA意义上的-à-vis看门人的访问权。到目前为止,要求访问捆绑的个人或汇总数据的第三方企业只能基于《欧盟运作条约》(TFEU)第102条的要求,而在搜索数据的情况下,则只能基于DMA第6(11)条。一种监管方法已被提议作为替代方案。本文力求将这种方法的大杂烩系统化,并辨别出可以指导立法机构创建和充实数据法律框架的更广泛的原则。理想情况下,基于数据共同生成者访问个人数据的权利,将出现捆绑个人数据或汇总数据的市场。为了实现这一目标,数据中介机构将不得不发挥更大的作用,并在捆绑和营销这些数据方面取得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书