The clinical efficacy and safety of Ginkgo biloba in vertigo patients: A meta-analysis

IF 1.7 Q2 Medicine
Xiang Gao, Yan Cheng, Fangyuan Liu, Xiaozhen Han, Chuanliang Liu
{"title":"The clinical efficacy and safety of Ginkgo biloba in vertigo patients: A meta-analysis","authors":"Xiang Gao,&nbsp;Yan Cheng,&nbsp;Fangyuan Liu,&nbsp;Xiaozhen Han,&nbsp;Chuanliang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.aimed.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We detected the clinical efficacy and safety of <em>Ginkgo biloba</em> in vertigo patients through a meta-analysis method.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, EBSCO, CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched for randomized controlled trials. Data about the clinical efficacy and safety of vertigo patients were collected. The <em>Ginkgo biloba</em> groups were pooled to compare with the control groups and obtain the pooled odds ratios and associated 95 % confidence interval.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We retrieved 25 randomized controlled studies enrolling 1209 patients. The addition of <em>Ginkgo biloba</em> improved vertigo in patients with vertebrobasilar artery insufficiency, cervical vertigo, and not-specific-disease vertigo but not in BPPV and Meniere’s disease. The incidence of adverse reactions such as headache, gastrointestinal discomfort, and skin rashes in the <em>Ginkgo biloba</em> group did not differ significantly from that of the control group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The addition of <em>Ginkgo biloba</em> had better clinical efficacy in patients with vertebrobasilar artery insufficiency, cervical vertigo, and not-specific-disease vertigo but not in BPPV and Meniere’s disease, and the <em>Ginkgo biloba</em> group had no significant differences in adverse reactions compared with the control group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7343,"journal":{"name":"Advances in integrative medicine","volume":"10 4","pages":"Pages 158-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in integrative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958823000836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We detected the clinical efficacy and safety of Ginkgo biloba in vertigo patients through a meta-analysis method.

Method

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, EBSCO, CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched for randomized controlled trials. Data about the clinical efficacy and safety of vertigo patients were collected. The Ginkgo biloba groups were pooled to compare with the control groups and obtain the pooled odds ratios and associated 95 % confidence interval.

Results

We retrieved 25 randomized controlled studies enrolling 1209 patients. The addition of Ginkgo biloba improved vertigo in patients with vertebrobasilar artery insufficiency, cervical vertigo, and not-specific-disease vertigo but not in BPPV and Meniere’s disease. The incidence of adverse reactions such as headache, gastrointestinal discomfort, and skin rashes in the Ginkgo biloba group did not differ significantly from that of the control group.

Conclusion

The addition of Ginkgo biloba had better clinical efficacy in patients with vertebrobasilar artery insufficiency, cervical vertigo, and not-specific-disease vertigo but not in BPPV and Meniere’s disease, and the Ginkgo biloba group had no significant differences in adverse reactions compared with the control group.
银杏叶治疗眩晕患者的临床疗效和安全性:一项meta分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in integrative medicine
Advances in integrative medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Integrative Medicine (AIMED) is an international peer-reviewed, evidence-based research and review journal that is multi-disciplinary within the fields of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. The journal focuses on rigorous quantitative and qualitative research including systematic reviews, clinical trials and surveys, whilst also welcoming medical hypotheses and clinically-relevant articles and case studies disclosing practical learning tools for the consulting practitioner. By promoting research and practice excellence in the field, and cross collaboration between relevant practitioner groups and associations, the journal aims to advance the practice of IM, identify areas for future research, and improve patient health outcomes. International networking is encouraged through clinical innovation, the establishment of best practice and by providing opportunities for cooperation between organisations and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信