Stated Preference Approach for Measuring the Perceived Benefit to Drive-Alone Users If They Switch to Park and Ride: An Indian Perspective

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Manaswinee Kar, Shubhajit Sadhukhan, Manoranjan Parida, Arpit Shrivastava
{"title":"Stated Preference Approach for Measuring the Perceived Benefit to Drive-Alone Users If They Switch to Park and Ride: An Indian Perspective","authors":"Manaswinee Kar, Shubhajit Sadhukhan, Manoranjan Parida, Arpit Shrivastava","doi":"10.1177/03611981231196150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Park and ride facilities can be a potential instrument for addressing the rising congestion problems and ensuring sustainable urban mobility in major Indian cities, equipped with fast and excellent metro systems. The present study attempts to understand the travel behavior of commuters (four-wheeled private vehicle users only) in relation to the introduction of park and ride as a sustainable and economical alternative mode of travel to driving alone in a private vehicle in the context of Delhi, India. The present study measures the perceived benefit to drive-alone users in Delhi with regard to their willingness to pay (WTP) for switching to a better-quality park and ride service instead of using their private vehicles. Choice-based responses along with socioeconomic and travel information were collected from 559 drive-alone users using a tablet-based stated preference survey instrument. The responses were then analyzed using a multinomial logit (MNL) model. Further, WTP estimates of the noncost attributes were calculated to derive the perceived benefit to drive-alone users if they were to switch to using a park and ride service. The study also developed a generalized cost (GC) equation using the parameter and WTP estimates derived from the MNL model. Finally, the study conducted a post-estimation analysis using the GC equation to examine the influences of identified explanatory attributes on the GC for drive-alone users who switched to park and ride. “Trip length,”“parking cost,” and “parking type” exerted a significant influence on the generalized cost, indicating that drive-alone users could expect considerable savings (perceived benefit with regard to utility gain) if they were to choose park and ride.","PeriodicalId":23279,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Record","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231196150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Park and ride facilities can be a potential instrument for addressing the rising congestion problems and ensuring sustainable urban mobility in major Indian cities, equipped with fast and excellent metro systems. The present study attempts to understand the travel behavior of commuters (four-wheeled private vehicle users only) in relation to the introduction of park and ride as a sustainable and economical alternative mode of travel to driving alone in a private vehicle in the context of Delhi, India. The present study measures the perceived benefit to drive-alone users in Delhi with regard to their willingness to pay (WTP) for switching to a better-quality park and ride service instead of using their private vehicles. Choice-based responses along with socioeconomic and travel information were collected from 559 drive-alone users using a tablet-based stated preference survey instrument. The responses were then analyzed using a multinomial logit (MNL) model. Further, WTP estimates of the noncost attributes were calculated to derive the perceived benefit to drive-alone users if they were to switch to using a park and ride service. The study also developed a generalized cost (GC) equation using the parameter and WTP estimates derived from the MNL model. Finally, the study conducted a post-estimation analysis using the GC equation to examine the influences of identified explanatory attributes on the GC for drive-alone users who switched to park and ride. “Trip length,”“parking cost,” and “parking type” exerted a significant influence on the generalized cost, indicating that drive-alone users could expect considerable savings (perceived benefit with regard to utility gain) if they were to choose park and ride.
衡量单独驾车用户如果转向停车和乘车的感知利益的陈述偏好方法:印度视角
停车换乘设施可以成为解决日益严重的拥堵问题和确保印度主要城市可持续交通的潜在工具,配备了快速而优秀的地铁系统。本研究试图了解通勤者的出行行为(仅限四轮私家车用户)与在印度德里引入停车换乘作为一种可持续和经济的替代独自驾驶私家车的出行方式的关系。目前的研究衡量了德里单独驾驶用户的感知利益,即他们愿意为转向质量更好的停车和转乘服务而不是使用私家车付费(WTP)。使用基于平板电脑的陈述偏好调查工具,从559名自驾用户中收集了基于选择的回答以及社会经济和旅行信息。然后使用多项logit (MNL)模型对响应进行分析。此外,对非成本属性的WTP估计进行了计算,以得出如果他们切换到使用停车换乘服务,单独驾驶用户的感知利益。该研究还利用从MNL模型中得到的参数和WTP估计,建立了广义成本(GC)方程。最后,研究使用GC方程进行了后估计分析,以检验识别的解释属性对转向停车和骑行的单独驾驶用户的GC的影响。“行程长度”、“停车成本”和“停车类型”对广义成本有显著影响,这表明如果选择停车和乘车,单独开车的用户可以预期可观的节省(关于效用增益的感知收益)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Research Record
Transportation Research Record 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
918
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board is one of the most cited and prolific transportation journals in the world, offering unparalleled depth and breadth in the coverage of transportation-related topics. The TRR publishes approximately 70 issues annually of outstanding, peer-reviewed papers presenting research findings in policy, planning, administration, economics and financing, operations, construction, design, maintenance, safety, and more, for all modes of transportation. This site provides electronic access to a full compilation of papers since the 1996 series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信