‘It happens in the best families’: gender and family ideologies in Jordanian family-related proverbs

IF 0.2 4区社会学 0 FOLKLORE

Folk Life-Journal of Ethnological Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1080/04308778.2023.2250598

Doaa K. Riziq, Hana O. Khalil

{"title":"‘It happens in the best families’: gender and family ideologies in Jordanian family-related proverbs","authors":"Doaa K. Riziq, Hana O. Khalil","doi":"10.1080/04308778.2023.2250598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study discusses gender and family-related proverbs in Jordanian Arabic (JA). It employs Hofstede’s dimensions of culture, especially the following: power distance, masculinity-femininity, and individualism-collectivism. These concepts help interpret culturally specific meanings in these short sayings. The data contain 100 JA proverbs. They are analysed in light of Hofstede’s model to identify the values inherent in ideas of family, power distribution between family members and gender practices. With reference to literature, the analysis reveals similarities with other cultures in some socio-cultural norms. The study suggests that patriarchal values and norms are widespread across cultures and that proverbs reveal this ideology.KEYWORDS: CulturecollectivismfemininityHofstede’s modelindividualismmasculinitypatriarchy Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1. Anderson, J. A. Book review: Folklore and folklife: An introduction, ed. by awaidhan Richard M. Dorson (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973), p. 119.2. Mieder, W. ‘Popular Views of the Proverb’. Proverbium, 2 (1985), 119. Mieder, W. Proverbs are never out of season: Popular wisdom in the modern age (Oxford University: Oxford University Press 1993), p.24. Mieder, W. Proverbs: A handbook (London: Greenwood Publishing Group 2004), p. 4. Mieder, W. Proverbs speak louder than words: folk wisdom in art, culture, folklore, history, literature and mass media (New York: Peter Lang 2008), p.11.3. Whiting, B. J. The Nature of the proverb Harvard studies and notes in philology and literature (Harvard University: Harvard University Press 1932), p. 302.4. Norrick, N.R. How proverbs mean? Semantic studies in English proverbs (Amsterdam: Mouton 1985), p. 78.5. Taylor, A. The proverb ; (No. 113) (Harvard University: Harvard University Press 1931).6. Mieder, op.cit., p. 9.7. Lubis, S. ‘The Equivalence and Nonequivalence of Proverbs across Cultures (Indonesian and English)’. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(4) (2018), 253. Rong, H. O. U. ‘Proverbs Reveal Culture Diversity’. Cross-Cultural Communication, 9(2) , 31–35.8. Romanova, T., Evdokimova, O., Zaharova, A., Ivanova, A., & Fedorova, N. ‘The Concept Family in the Russian and Ukrainian Language Culture (Based on Proverbs and Sayings)’ (SHS Web of Conferences, 69. EDP Sciences, 00136, 2019).9. Nelyubova, N. Y., Dugalich, N. M., & Ershov, V. I. ‘Semantic Condensations in French and Russian Proverbs Based on the Thematic Group Family’. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 12 (4) (2021), 1051–1074.10. Degener, A. ‘Family Relationships in Proverbs from Northern Pakistan’. Proverbium: Yearbook of International Proverb Scholarship, 39(1) (2022), 1–28.11. Al-Amad, H. “صورة المرأة في الأمثال الشعبية الأردنية” The Image of Woman in the Jordanian Folk Sayings’. Dirasat: Human & Social Sciences, 33(2) (2006), 266–284. Alexeeva, T. E. ‘English Proverbs as a Reflection of Social Stereotypes’. Vestnik of Samara University. History, Pedagogics, Philology, 28(3) (2022), 127–135. Rani, U., & Ranjha, M. I. ‘Representation of Men and Women in English Proverbs: Analysis of Power Relationships’. Journal of English Language, Literature and Education, 2(02) (2020), 35–62.12. Radner. J. N, ed., Feminist Messages: Coding in Women’s Folklore (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1993).13. Boesen, I. W. ‘Women, Honour and Love: Some Aspects of the Pashtun Woman’s Life in Eastern Afghanistan’. Folk, 21 (1980), 22.14. Rasul, S. ‘Gender and Power Relationships in the Language of Proverbs: Image of a Woman’. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2) (2015), 53–62.15. Jayawardena, H. S. M. M. ‘Women in Proverbs: A Comparative Study in French and Sinhala’. International Journal of Language and Literature, 3(2) (2015), 107–116.16. Buja, E. ‘Proverbs as a Means of Crossing Cultural Borders’. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 10(2) (2018), 85–97.17. Degener, op.cit., pp. 1–28.18. Bishwakarma, G. ‘The Role of Nepalese Proverbs in Perpetuating Gendered Cultural Values’. Advances in Applied Sociology, 10(4) (2020), 103–114.19. Rani, U., & Ranjha, M. I. ‘Representation of Men and Women in English Proverbs: Analysis of Power Relationships’. Journal of English Language, Literature and Education, 2(02) (2020), 35–62.20. Kuttikat, M. A synthesis of studies examining Sri Lankan refugee families in India. in The Routledge Handbook of Refugees in India (India: Routledge India 2022), pp. 655–663.21. Rubab, I., Sadia, S., & Ajmal, M. ‘A Descriptive Study of Gender Inequality in Proverbs of Mewati Language’. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1) (2023), 2152946.22. Buja, op.cit., p. 217.23. Rakhimova, A. E., Mukhamadiarova, A. F., & Tarasova, F. K. ‘Linguistic Band Cultural Characteristics of Proverbs Describing Family Relations in the German Linguistic Picture of the World’. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(6) (2019), 1048–1055.24. Romanova, et al., op.cit., p. 00136.25. Gebeyehu, T. A. ‘The Negative Representation of Women in the Language of Awngi Proverbs’. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 6(2) (2019), 479–490.26. Ennaji, M. ‘Representations of Women in Moroccan Arabic and Berber Proverbs’.‏ International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 190 (2008), 167–181.27. Al-Amad, op.cit., pp. 266–284. Al-Shurufat, S. “صورة المرأة في الأمثال الشعبية الأردنية” ‘The Portrayal of Women in Jordanian Folk Proverbs’. Revue Académique des Études Sociales et Humaines, 7 (2012), 34–41.28. Al-Amad, op.cit., pp. 266–284.29. Al-Shurufat, op.cit., pp. 34–41.30. Al-Zubeidi, A. J. A. (2017). ‘Patriarchal Concepts of Woman in English, and Arabic Proverbs’ (The 18th yearly conference of the College of Basic Education, Iraq).31. Alfaleh, B. A. ‘Translation Quality Assessment of Proverbs from English into Arabic: The Case Study of One Thousand and One English Proverbs Translated into Arabic’. Arab World English Journal, May, (2020), 1–56. Al-khresheh, M. H., & Almaaytah, S. A. ‘English Proverbs into Arabic through Machine Translation’. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(5) (2018), 158–166. Farghal, M., & Al-Hamly, M. ‘Arabic Proverbs in Fiction Translation: Girls of Riyadh as an Example’. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literature, 7(1) (2015), 1–20. Shehab, E., & Daragmeh, A. ‘A Context-based Approach to Proverb Translation: The Case of Arabic into English Translation’. Translation Review, 90(1) (2014), pp. 51–68.32. Hofstede, G. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. (London: Sage Publications, 1980). Hofstede, G. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (London: McGraw-Hill, 1991).33. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, J. G., & Minkov, M. Cultures and organizations Software of the mind: Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival (London: McGraw-Hill, 2010), p. 61.34. ibid., p. 61.35. ibid., p. 151.36. ibid., p. 522.37. McSweeney, B. ‘Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and Their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith a Failure of Analysis’. Human relations, 55(1) (2002), 89–118. Podrug, N., Pavičić, J., & Bratić, V. Cross-cultural comparison of Hofstede’s dimensions and decision-making style within CEE context. From transition to sustainable development: The path to European integration (2006), 339–343. Zamanabadi, K. I., Kavousy, E., & Tehrani, M. M. ‘Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions and HSE Culture Behaviour’. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (Nigerian Chapter), 3(1) (2015), 45–49. Satam, H., & Wisam, H. ‘Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions (Masculinity vs. Femininity) And Its Impact on Earnings Management’. Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 35 (2019), 2887–2899.38. Obeidat, B. Y., Shannak, R. O., Masa’deh, R. E. M. D. T., & Al-Jarrah, I. ‘Toward Better Understanding for Arabian Culture: Implications Based on Hofstede’s Cultural Model’. European Journal of Social Sciences, 28(4) (2012), 512–522.39. Ba-awaidhan, A. G. ‘Culture Diversity in G. Hofstede’s Model with Reference to English-Arabic Proverbs’. in Contacts and Contrasts in Cultures and Languages (2019), pp. 47–63.40. Al-Amad, H. “الأمثال الشعبية الأردنية” Jordanian folk proverbs (Amman: Ministry of Culture and Youth 1978).41. Al-Azizi, R. “معلمة للتراث الأردني” Ma’lama for the Jordanian Heritage (Jordan: Ministry of Culture 2012).42. Farghal, M. “الأمثال الشعبية العربية (بعدسة أردنية)” Arab Popular Proverbs (through a Jordanian Lens) (Jordan: Zamzam 2021).43. Al-Amad, op.cit., pp. 266–284. Al-Shurufat, op.cit., pp. 34–41. Al-Sweerky, M. “صورة المرأة الأردنية ومكانتها في الأمثال الشعبية” The Image of the Jordanian Woman and Her Status in the Folk Proverbs’. Afkar, 369 (2019), 104–111. Shomari, E. “بنائية الجملة في الأمثال الشعبية الأردنية” The Structure of Sentence in the Jordanian Folk Proverbs’. JFABSU (2011), 42–92.44. Lubis, op.cit., p. 253. Rong, op.cit., pp. 31–35.45. Buja, op.cit., pp. 85–97. Romanova, et al., op. cit., p. 00136.46. Boesen, op.cit., p. 22. Ennaji, op.cit., pp. 167–181. Rasul, op.cit., pp. 53–62. Jayawardena, op.cit., pp. 107–116. Bishwakarma, op.cit., pp. 103–114. Degener, op.cit., pp. 1–28.47. Romanova, et al., op.cit., p. 00136. Nelyubova, et al., op.cit., pp.1051–1074. Degener, op.cit., pp. 1–28.Additional informationNotes on contributorsDoaa K. RiziqDoaa K. Riziq earned her PhD degree in Linguistics from the University of Jordan. She has a master’s degree in Applied Linguistics and Teaching English as a Foreign Language from Mutah University, Jordan and a BA degree in Applied English from Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan. She is an assistant professor of Linguistics at Applied Science Private University (Amman, Jordan). Her current research interests are in the field of Psycholinguistics, Cognitive Semantics, Pragmatics, Contrastive Linguistics and Intercultural Communication.Hana O. KhalilHana O. Khalil earned her PhD degree in Arabic Language and Literature from the University of Jordan. Currently, she is an associate Professor at Isra University (Amman, Jordan). Her current research interests are in the field of Arabic Literature, Anthropology, Cultural Diversity, Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication.","PeriodicalId":51989,"journal":{"name":"Folk Life-Journal of Ethnological Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folk Life-Journal of Ethnological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/04308778.2023.2250598","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis study discusses gender and family-related proverbs in Jordanian Arabic (JA). It employs Hofstede’s dimensions of culture, especially the following: power distance, masculinity-femininity, and individualism-collectivism. These concepts help interpret culturally specific meanings in these short sayings. The data contain 100 JA proverbs. They are analysed in light of Hofstede’s model to identify the values inherent in ideas of family, power distribution between family members and gender practices. With reference to literature, the analysis reveals similarities with other cultures in some socio-cultural norms. The study suggests that patriarchal values and norms are widespread across cultures and that proverbs reveal this ideology.KEYWORDS: CulturecollectivismfemininityHofstede’s modelindividualismmasculinitypatriarchy Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1. Anderson, J. A. Book review: Folklore and folklife: An introduction, ed. by awaidhan Richard M. Dorson (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973), p. 119.2. Mieder, W. ‘Popular Views of the Proverb’. Proverbium, 2 (1985), 119. Mieder, W. Proverbs are never out of season: Popular wisdom in the modern age (Oxford University: Oxford University Press 1993), p.24. Mieder, W. Proverbs: A handbook (London: Greenwood Publishing Group 2004), p. 4. Mieder, W. Proverbs speak louder than words: folk wisdom in art, culture, folklore, history, literature and mass media (New York: Peter Lang 2008), p.11.3. Whiting, B. J. The Nature of the proverb Harvard studies and notes in philology and literature (Harvard University: Harvard University Press 1932), p. 302.4. Norrick, N.R. How proverbs mean? Semantic studies in English proverbs (Amsterdam: Mouton 1985), p. 78.5. Taylor, A. The proverb ; (No. 113) (Harvard University: Harvard University Press 1931).6. Mieder, op.cit., p. 9.7. Lubis, S. ‘The Equivalence and Nonequivalence of Proverbs across Cultures (Indonesian and English)’. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(4) (2018), 253. Rong, H. O. U. ‘Proverbs Reveal Culture Diversity’. Cross-Cultural Communication, 9(2) , 31–35.8. Romanova, T., Evdokimova, O., Zaharova, A., Ivanova, A., & Fedorova, N. ‘The Concept Family in the Russian and Ukrainian Language Culture (Based on Proverbs and Sayings)’ (SHS Web of Conferences, 69. EDP Sciences, 00136, 2019).9. Nelyubova, N. Y., Dugalich, N. M., & Ershov, V. I. ‘Semantic Condensations in French and Russian Proverbs Based on the Thematic Group Family’. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 12 (4) (2021), 1051–1074.10. Degener, A. ‘Family Relationships in Proverbs from Northern Pakistan’. Proverbium: Yearbook of International Proverb Scholarship, 39(1) (2022), 1–28.11. Al-Amad, H. “صورة المرأة في الأمثال الشعبية الأردنية” The Image of Woman in the Jordanian Folk Sayings’. Dirasat: Human & Social Sciences, 33(2) (2006), 266–284. Alexeeva, T. E. ‘English Proverbs as a Reflection of Social Stereotypes’. Vestnik of Samara University. History, Pedagogics, Philology, 28(3) (2022), 127–135. Rani, U., & Ranjha, M. I. ‘Representation of Men and Women in English Proverbs: Analysis of Power Relationships’. Journal of English Language, Literature and Education, 2(02) (2020), 35–62.12. Radner. J. N, ed., Feminist Messages: Coding in Women’s Folklore (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1993).13. Boesen, I. W. ‘Women, Honour and Love: Some Aspects of the Pashtun Woman’s Life in Eastern Afghanistan’. Folk, 21 (1980), 22.14. Rasul, S. ‘Gender and Power Relationships in the Language of Proverbs: Image of a Woman’. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2) (2015), 53–62.15. Jayawardena, H. S. M. M. ‘Women in Proverbs: A Comparative Study in French and Sinhala’. International Journal of Language and Literature, 3(2) (2015), 107–116.16. Buja, E. ‘Proverbs as a Means of Crossing Cultural Borders’. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 10(2) (2018), 85–97.17. Degener, op.cit., pp. 1–28.18. Bishwakarma, G. ‘The Role of Nepalese Proverbs in Perpetuating Gendered Cultural Values’. Advances in Applied Sociology, 10(4) (2020), 103–114.19. Rani, U., & Ranjha, M. I. ‘Representation of Men and Women in English Proverbs: Analysis of Power Relationships’. Journal of English Language, Literature and Education, 2(02) (2020), 35–62.20. Kuttikat, M. A synthesis of studies examining Sri Lankan refugee families in India. in The Routledge Handbook of Refugees in India (India: Routledge India 2022), pp. 655–663.21. Rubab, I., Sadia, S., & Ajmal, M. ‘A Descriptive Study of Gender Inequality in Proverbs of Mewati Language’. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1) (2023), 2152946.22. Buja, op.cit., p. 217.23. Rakhimova, A. E., Mukhamadiarova, A. F., & Tarasova, F. K. ‘Linguistic Band Cultural Characteristics of Proverbs Describing Family Relations in the German Linguistic Picture of the World’. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(6) (2019), 1048–1055.24. Romanova, et al., op.cit., p. 00136.25. Gebeyehu, T. A. ‘The Negative Representation of Women in the Language of Awngi Proverbs’. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 6(2) (2019), 479–490.26. Ennaji, M. ‘Representations of Women in Moroccan Arabic and Berber Proverbs’.‏ International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 190 (2008), 167–181.27. Al-Amad, op.cit., pp. 266–284. Al-Shurufat, S. “صورة المرأة في الأمثال الشعبية الأردنية” ‘The Portrayal of Women in Jordanian Folk Proverbs’. Revue Académique des Études Sociales et Humaines, 7 (2012), 34–41.28. Al-Amad, op.cit., pp. 266–284.29. Al-Shurufat, op.cit., pp. 34–41.30. Al-Zubeidi, A. J. A. (2017). ‘Patriarchal Concepts of Woman in English, and Arabic Proverbs’ (The 18th yearly conference of the College of Basic Education, Iraq).31. Alfaleh, B. A. ‘Translation Quality Assessment of Proverbs from English into Arabic: The Case Study of One Thousand and One English Proverbs Translated into Arabic’. Arab World English Journal, May, (2020), 1–56. Al-khresheh, M. H., & Almaaytah, S. A. ‘English Proverbs into Arabic through Machine Translation’. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(5) (2018), 158–166. Farghal, M., & Al-Hamly, M. ‘Arabic Proverbs in Fiction Translation: Girls of Riyadh as an Example’. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literature, 7(1) (2015), 1–20. Shehab, E., & Daragmeh, A. ‘A Context-based Approach to Proverb Translation: The Case of Arabic into English Translation’. Translation Review, 90(1) (2014), pp. 51–68.32. Hofstede, G. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. (London: Sage Publications, 1980). Hofstede, G. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (London: McGraw-Hill, 1991).33. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, J. G., & Minkov, M. Cultures and organizations Software of the mind: Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival (London: McGraw-Hill, 2010), p. 61.34. ibid., p. 61.35. ibid., p. 151.36. ibid., p. 522.37. McSweeney, B. ‘Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and Their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith a Failure of Analysis’. Human relations, 55(1) (2002), 89–118. Podrug, N., Pavičić, J., & Bratić, V. Cross-cultural comparison of Hofstede’s dimensions and decision-making style within CEE context. From transition to sustainable development: The path to European integration (2006), 339–343. Zamanabadi, K. I., Kavousy, E., & Tehrani, M. M. ‘Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions and HSE Culture Behaviour’. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (Nigerian Chapter), 3(1) (2015), 45–49. Satam, H., & Wisam, H. ‘Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions (Masculinity vs. Femininity) And Its Impact on Earnings Management’. Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 35 (2019), 2887–2899.38. Obeidat, B. Y., Shannak, R. O., Masa’deh, R. E. M. D. T., & Al-Jarrah, I. ‘Toward Better Understanding for Arabian Culture: Implications Based on Hofstede’s Cultural Model’. European Journal of Social Sciences, 28(4) (2012), 512–522.39. Ba-awaidhan, A. G. ‘Culture Diversity in G. Hofstede’s Model with Reference to English-Arabic Proverbs’. in Contacts and Contrasts in Cultures and Languages (2019), pp. 47–63.40. Al-Amad, H. “الأمثال الشعبية الأردنية” Jordanian folk proverbs (Amman: Ministry of Culture and Youth 1978).41. Al-Azizi, R. “معلمة للتراث الأردني” Ma’lama for the Jordanian Heritage (Jordan: Ministry of Culture 2012).42. Farghal, M. “الأمثال الشعبية العربية (بعدسة أردنية)” Arab Popular Proverbs (through a Jordanian Lens) (Jordan: Zamzam 2021).43. Al-Amad, op.cit., pp. 266–284. Al-Shurufat, op.cit., pp. 34–41. Al-Sweerky, M. “صورة المرأة الأردنية ومكانتها في الأمثال الشعبية” The Image of the Jordanian Woman and Her Status in the Folk Proverbs’. Afkar, 369 (2019), 104–111. Shomari, E. “بنائية الجملة في الأمثال الشعبية الأردنية” The Structure of Sentence in the Jordanian Folk Proverbs’. JFABSU (2011), 42–92.44. Lubis, op.cit., p. 253. Rong, op.cit., pp. 31–35.45. Buja, op.cit., pp. 85–97. Romanova, et al., op. cit., p. 00136.46. Boesen, op.cit., p. 22. Ennaji, op.cit., pp. 167–181. Rasul, op.cit., pp. 53–62. Jayawardena, op.cit., pp. 107–116. Bishwakarma, op.cit., pp. 103–114. Degener, op.cit., pp. 1–28.47. Romanova, et al., op.cit., p. 00136. Nelyubova, et al., op.cit., pp.1051–1074. Degener, op.cit., pp. 1–28.Additional informationNotes on contributorsDoaa K. RiziqDoaa K. Riziq earned her PhD degree in Linguistics from the University of Jordan. She has a master’s degree in Applied Linguistics and Teaching English as a Foreign Language from Mutah University, Jordan and a BA degree in Applied English from Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan. She is an assistant professor of Linguistics at Applied Science Private University (Amman, Jordan). Her current research interests are in the field of Psycholinguistics, Cognitive Semantics, Pragmatics, Contrastive Linguistics and Intercultural Communication.Hana O. KhalilHana O. Khalil earned her PhD degree in Arabic Language and Literature from the University of Jordan. Currently, she is an associate Professor at Isra University (Amman, Jordan). Her current research interests are in the field of Arabic Literature, Anthropology, Cultural Diversity, Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication.

查看原文本刊更多论文

“它发生在最好的家庭”:约旦家庭谚语中的性别和家庭意识形态

摘要本研究探讨了约旦阿拉伯语中与性别和家庭有关的谚语。它采用了霍夫斯泰德的文化维度，特别是以下几个方面:权力距离，男性-女性气质，个人主义-集体主义。这些概念有助于解释这些简短谚语中的特定文化含义。数据包含100个JA谚语。根据Hofstede的模型对其进行分析，以确定家庭观念、家庭成员之间的权力分配和性别实践中固有的价值观。通过对文学的分析，揭示了一些社会文化规范与其他文化的相似之处。研究表明，父权价值观和规范在各种文化中普遍存在，谚语揭示了这种意识形态。关键词:文化回忆主义女性主义hofstede模型个人主义男性主义父权制披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。书评:《民俗学与民间生活:导论》，由艾德汉·理查德·m·多尔森主编(芝加哥:芝加哥大学出版社，1973)，第119.2页。米德，W.《谚语的大众观点》。箴言，2(1985)，119。箴言永远不会过时:现代的大众智慧(牛津大学:牛津大学出版社1993)，第24页。米德，W.箴言:一本手册(伦敦:格林伍德出版集团2004)，第4页。谚语比言语更响亮:艺术、文化、民间传说、历史、文学和大众传媒中的民间智慧(纽约:Peter Lang 2008)，第11.3页。《哈佛在语言学和文学方面的研究和注释:谚语的性质》(哈佛大学:哈佛大学出版社1932年)，第302.4页。谚语是什么意思?英语谚语的语义研究(阿姆斯特丹:木顿出版社1985)，页78.5。泰勒，A.谚语;(第113号)(哈佛大学:哈佛大学出版社1931)。Mieder, 12月。，第9.7页。跨文化谚语的对等和非对等(印尼语和英语)。国际英语语言学杂志，8(4)(2018)，253。荣鸿宇《谚语揭示文化多样性》。跨文化交际，9(2)，31-35.8。Romanova, T.， Evdokimova, O.， Zaharova, A.， Ivanova, A.， & Fedorova, N.，“俄罗斯和乌克兰语言文化中的概念家庭(基于谚语和谚语)”(SHS Web of Conferences, 69)。9.电子数据科学，2001,19(6):829 - 829。Nelyubova, n.y.， Dugalich, n.m.， & Ershov, v.i.“基于主题群家族的法语和俄语谚语的语义凝聚”。中华人民共和国语言研究学报，12(4)(2021)，1051-1074.10。Degener, A.《北巴基斯坦谚语中的家庭关系》。《国际谚语学术年鉴》，39(1)(2022)，1 - 28.11。Al-Amad h .“صورةالمرأةفيالأمثالالشعبيةالأردنية”女人的形象在约旦民间语录”。地理学报，33(2)(2006)，266-284。Alexeeva, t.e.《英语谚语作为社会刻板印象的反映》。萨马拉大学的Vestnik说。历史、教育学、语言学，28(3)(2022)，127-135。Rani, U， & Ranjha, m.i.《英语谚语中男性和女性的表现:权力关系分析》。英语语言文学与教育学报，2(02)(2020)，35-62.12。孤度。J. N .编，《女权主义信息:女性民俗中的编码》(厄巴纳:伊利诺伊大学出版社，1993).13。《妇女、荣誉与爱:阿富汗东部普什图妇女生活的某些方面》。Folk, 21(1980)， 22.14。《谚语语言中的性别和权力关系:女性形象》。社会科学学报，9(2)(2015)，53-62.15。贾亚瓦德纳，H. S. M. M.，《谚语中的妇女:法语和僧伽罗语的比较研究》。国际语言文学学报，3(2)(2015)，107-116.16。布贾，E.《谚语作为跨越文化边界的手段》。智慧大学学报，文字学，10(2)(2018)，85-97.17。德根,12月。，页1-28.18。Bishwakarma, G.“尼泊尔谚语在延续性别文化价值观中的作用”。应用社会学进展，10(4)(2020)，103-114.19。Rani, U， & Ranjha, m.i.《英语谚语中男性和女性的表现:权力关系分析》。英语语言文学与教育学报，2(02)(2020)，35-62.20。对在印度的斯里兰卡难民家庭的综合研究。《印度难民劳特利奇手册》(印度:劳特利奇印度2022)，第655-663.21页。Rubab, I.， Sadia, S.， and Ajmal, M.，《梅瓦蒂语谚语中性别不平等的描述性研究》。美术与人文，10(1)(2023)，2152946.22。Buja, 12月。，第217.23页。Rakhimova, A. E.， Mukhamadiarova, A. F.， & Tarasova, F. K.“德国语言世界图景中描述家庭关系的谚语的语言文化特征”。人文社科评论，7(6)(2019)，1048-1055.24。罗曼诺娃等，同上。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Folk Life-Journal of Ethnological Studies FOLKLORE-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

66.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Folk Life: Journal of Ethnological Studies is a journal devoted to the study of all aspects of traditional ways of life in Great Britain and Ireland. The journal publishes original, high quality, peer-reviewed research in the form of unsolicited articles, solicited papers (which are usually selected from those read at the Society"s annual conference) and of members" papers (which are usually short reports of work in progress). Work published in Folk Life may include, for example, papers dealing with the traditional ways of life of other countries and regions, which may be compared to or contrasted with those of Great Britain and Ireland.