Anxiety and coping during COVID-19. Investigation of anxiety management types in a German and Polish sample

IF 2.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Sebastian Mueller-Haugk, Ilona Bidzan-Bluma, Monika Bidzan-Wiącek, Darshika Thejani Bulathwatta, Marcus Stueck
{"title":"Anxiety and coping during COVID-19. Investigation of anxiety management types in a German and Polish sample","authors":"Sebastian Mueller-Haugk, Ilona Bidzan-Bluma, Monika Bidzan-Wiącek, Darshika Thejani Bulathwatta, Marcus Stueck","doi":"10.5114/hpr/171884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The study aimed to assess the differences in anxiety management types between German and Polish samples. The research was conducted in the context of health-related variables and anxiety management types during the period of March to April 2020. The research project was approved by the Ethical Committee at the Institute of Psychology at the University of Gdansk, Poland. Participants and procedure German Sample: Consisted of 323 subjects with an average age of 46 years. 73% were females, and 26% were males. Polish Sample: Included 100 subjects with an average age of 42 years. 73% were females, and 27% were males. The study collected data on various health-related variables and anxiety management types using specific measurement procedures. Results There were significant differences in the frequency distribution of anxiety management types between the Polish and Ger-man samples (p < .001). In the Polish sample, 60% showed negative anxiety management types (Sensitizer, Repressor, Highly anxious), compared to the German sample with 52%. 40% of the Polish and 48% of the German sample showed positive expressions. There were stronger significant differences in both samples regarding health-related variables, with the Polish sample being at a disadvantage. Conclusions The study provides a comprehensive insight into the anxiety management types between German and Polish samples, re-vealing distinct differences in their responses. The Polish sample exhibited a higher prevalence of negative anxiety manage-ment types compared to the German sample. These disparities can be attributed to a myriad of factors, including historical traumas, transgenerational experiences, and the influence of dominant religions in each country. The findings underscore the importance of considering cultural, historical, and religious contexts when assessing and addressing mental health and cop-ing mechanisms across different populations. Further research with larger samples and diverse groups could offer a more nuanced understanding of these patterns and their underlying causes.","PeriodicalId":44293,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Report","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr/171884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The study aimed to assess the differences in anxiety management types between German and Polish samples. The research was conducted in the context of health-related variables and anxiety management types during the period of March to April 2020. The research project was approved by the Ethical Committee at the Institute of Psychology at the University of Gdansk, Poland. Participants and procedure German Sample: Consisted of 323 subjects with an average age of 46 years. 73% were females, and 26% were males. Polish Sample: Included 100 subjects with an average age of 42 years. 73% were females, and 27% were males. The study collected data on various health-related variables and anxiety management types using specific measurement procedures. Results There were significant differences in the frequency distribution of anxiety management types between the Polish and Ger-man samples (p < .001). In the Polish sample, 60% showed negative anxiety management types (Sensitizer, Repressor, Highly anxious), compared to the German sample with 52%. 40% of the Polish and 48% of the German sample showed positive expressions. There were stronger significant differences in both samples regarding health-related variables, with the Polish sample being at a disadvantage. Conclusions The study provides a comprehensive insight into the anxiety management types between German and Polish samples, re-vealing distinct differences in their responses. The Polish sample exhibited a higher prevalence of negative anxiety manage-ment types compared to the German sample. These disparities can be attributed to a myriad of factors, including historical traumas, transgenerational experiences, and the influence of dominant religions in each country. The findings underscore the importance of considering cultural, historical, and religious contexts when assessing and addressing mental health and cop-ing mechanisms across different populations. Further research with larger samples and diverse groups could offer a more nuanced understanding of these patterns and their underlying causes.
COVID-19期间的焦虑和应对。德国和波兰样本焦虑管理类型的调查
本研究旨在评估德国和波兰样本之间焦虑管理类型的差异。该研究是在2020年3月至4月期间与健康相关的变量和焦虑管理类型的背景下进行的。该研究项目得到了波兰格但斯克大学心理研究所伦理委员会的批准。德国样本:由323名平均年龄为46岁的受试者组成。73%为女性,26%为男性。波兰样本:包括100名平均年龄42岁的受试者。73%为女性,27%为男性。该研究使用特定的测量程序收集了各种与健康相关的变量和焦虑管理类型的数据。结果波兰人和德国人在焦虑管理类型的频率分布上存在显著差异(p <措施)。在波兰样本中,60%的人表现出消极的焦虑管理类型(敏感者、压抑者、高度焦虑者),而德国样本中这一比例为52%。40%的波兰人和48%的德国人表现出积极的表情。两个样本在健康相关变量方面存在更强的显著差异,波兰样本处于劣势。结论:本研究对德国和波兰样本之间的焦虑管理类型提供了全面的见解,揭示了他们的反应的明显差异。与德国样本相比,波兰样本显示出更高的负性焦虑管理类型的患病率。这些差异可以归因于无数的因素,包括历史创伤、跨代经历和每个国家主要宗教的影响。研究结果强调了在评估和解决不同人群的心理健康和应对机制时考虑文化、历史和宗教背景的重要性。对更大样本和不同群体的进一步研究可以提供对这些模式及其潜在原因的更细致的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology Report
Health Psychology Report PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信