Flood Debris Quantification and Comparison Based on the Removal and Disposal Operation: Postdisaster Study of Beaumont, Texas Following Hurricane Harvey
{"title":"Flood Debris Quantification and Comparison Based on the Removal and Disposal Operation: Postdisaster Study of Beaumont, Texas Following Hurricane Harvey","authors":"Jasmine H. Bekkaye, Navid H. Jafari","doi":"10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-1785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate forecasts and estimates of disaster debris are critical for effective debris management planning. However, detailed postdisaster waste data to validate and improve debris predictions is often unavailable. In this study, a postdisaster waste dataset collected in Beaumont, Texas, following widespread flooding from Hurricane Harvey that included debris tonnages and coordinate locations of each debris removal in residential areas was investigated. The dataset was utilized to quantify the amount of debris produced, identify the factors that influenced debris generation in different areas of the city, and compare Beaumont debris tonnages to predictive models. The study found that the type of flooding (riverine versus urban) had the highest influence on debris generation. Riverine flooded areas generated twice the debris tonnage as urban flooded areas. Elevation appeared to influence debris generation when considered with the type of flooding. FEMA’s correlation for flooded personal property was within the same magnitude of debris quantities, while other methods significantly overpredicted debris quantities (up to one order of magnitude) due to their generality. However, they can be adapted for flood-generated debris. Urban flooding is an increasingly prevalent issue following a natural hazard and generates considerable amounts of debris, but is not addressed in current disaster management plans. Estimation methods that consider urban flooding should be developed.","PeriodicalId":51262,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-1785","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate forecasts and estimates of disaster debris are critical for effective debris management planning. However, detailed postdisaster waste data to validate and improve debris predictions is often unavailable. In this study, a postdisaster waste dataset collected in Beaumont, Texas, following widespread flooding from Hurricane Harvey that included debris tonnages and coordinate locations of each debris removal in residential areas was investigated. The dataset was utilized to quantify the amount of debris produced, identify the factors that influenced debris generation in different areas of the city, and compare Beaumont debris tonnages to predictive models. The study found that the type of flooding (riverine versus urban) had the highest influence on debris generation. Riverine flooded areas generated twice the debris tonnage as urban flooded areas. Elevation appeared to influence debris generation when considered with the type of flooding. FEMA’s correlation for flooded personal property was within the same magnitude of debris quantities, while other methods significantly overpredicted debris quantities (up to one order of magnitude) due to their generality. However, they can be adapted for flood-generated debris. Urban flooding is an increasingly prevalent issue following a natural hazard and generates considerable amounts of debris, but is not addressed in current disaster management plans. Estimation methods that consider urban flooding should be developed.
期刊介绍:
The Natural Hazards Review addresses the range of events, processes, and consequences that occur when natural hazards interact with the physical, social, economic, and engineered dimensions of communities and the people who live, work, and play in them. As these conditions interact and change, the impact on human communities increases in size, scale, and scope. Such interactions necessarily need to be analyzed from an interdisciplinary perspective that includes both social and technical measures. For decision makers, the risk presents the challenge of managing known hazards, but unknown consequences in time of occurrence, scale of impact, and level of disruption in actual communities with limited resources. The journal is dedicated to bringing together the physical, social, and behavioral sciences; engineering; and the regulatory and policy environments to provide a forum for cutting edge, holistic, and cross-disciplinary approaches to anticipating risk, loss, and cost reduction from natural hazards. The journal welcomes rigorous research on the intersection between social and technical systems that advances concepts of resilience within lifeline and infrastructure systems and the organizations that manage them for all hazards. It offers a professional forum for researchers and practitioners working together to publish the results of truly interdisciplinary and partnered approaches to the anticipation of risk, loss reduction, and community resilience. Engineering topics covered include the characterization of hazard forces and the planning, design, construction, maintenance, performance, and use of structures in the physical environment. Social and behavioral sciences topics include analysis of the impact of hazards on communities and the organizations that seek to mitigate and manage response to hazards.