Evaluation of TPM adoption factors in manufacturing organizations using fuzzy PIPRECIA method

IF 1.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
None Vikas, Akanksha Mishra
{"title":"Evaluation of TPM adoption factors in manufacturing organizations using fuzzy PIPRECIA method","authors":"None Vikas, Akanksha Mishra","doi":"10.1108/jqme-11-2020-0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The aim of this paper states that total productive maintenance (TPM) is an improvement tool which employs the effective utilization of employees in order to enhance the reliability of the equipment in consideration. Design/methodology/approach This paper identifies and evaluates the factors accountable for the adoption of TPM methodology in manufacturing organizations. Twenty-four factors affecting the TPM implementation are explored and categorized into five significant categories. Afterwards, these identified TPM factors have been evaluated by using a most popular Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach namely fuzzy pivot pairwise relative criteria importance assessment (F-PIPRECIA). Findings In this paper, through application of F-PIPRECIA, “Behavioural factor” is ranked first while “Financial factor” the last. Considering the sub-factors, “Top management support and commitment” is ranked first while “Effective use of performance indices” is ranked the last. A further sensitivity analysis indicates the factors that need higher level of attention. Practical implications The result of current research work may be exploited by the top administration of manufacturing enterprises for assessing their TPM adoption status and to recognize the frail links of TPM application and improve accordingly. Moreover, significant factors of TPM can be identified and deploy them successfully in their implementation procedure. Originality/value The conclusion obtained from this research enables the management to clearly understand the significance of each considered factor on the adoption of TPM in the organization and hence, provides effective utilization of resources.","PeriodicalId":16938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jqme-11-2020-0115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this paper states that total productive maintenance (TPM) is an improvement tool which employs the effective utilization of employees in order to enhance the reliability of the equipment in consideration. Design/methodology/approach This paper identifies and evaluates the factors accountable for the adoption of TPM methodology in manufacturing organizations. Twenty-four factors affecting the TPM implementation are explored and categorized into five significant categories. Afterwards, these identified TPM factors have been evaluated by using a most popular Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach namely fuzzy pivot pairwise relative criteria importance assessment (F-PIPRECIA). Findings In this paper, through application of F-PIPRECIA, “Behavioural factor” is ranked first while “Financial factor” the last. Considering the sub-factors, “Top management support and commitment” is ranked first while “Effective use of performance indices” is ranked the last. A further sensitivity analysis indicates the factors that need higher level of attention. Practical implications The result of current research work may be exploited by the top administration of manufacturing enterprises for assessing their TPM adoption status and to recognize the frail links of TPM application and improve accordingly. Moreover, significant factors of TPM can be identified and deploy them successfully in their implementation procedure. Originality/value The conclusion obtained from this research enables the management to clearly understand the significance of each considered factor on the adoption of TPM in the organization and hence, provides effective utilization of resources.
用模糊PIPRECIA方法评价制造企业TPM采用因素
本文的目的是指出全面生产维护(TPM)是一种改进工具,通过员工的有效利用来提高所考虑的设备的可靠性。设计/方法/方法本文确定并评估了在制造组织中采用TPM方法的因素。本文探讨了影响TPM实施的24个因素,并将其分为五大类。然后,通过使用最流行的多标准决策(MCDM)方法,即模糊枢轴对相对标准重要性评估(F-PIPRECIA),对这些确定的TPM因素进行评估。在本文中,通过运用F-PIPRECIA,“行为因素”排名第一,“财务因素”排名最后。从子因素来看,“最高管理层的支持和承诺”排名第一,“绩效指标的有效利用”排名最后。进一步的敏感性分析表明需要高度关注的因素。实际意义本研究成果可为制造业企业高层管理人员评估企业TPM采用状况,识别TPM应用中的薄弱环节并进行相应改进提供参考。此外,可以识别TPM的重要因素,并在其实施过程中成功地部署它们。本研究得出的结论使管理层能够清楚地了解各考虑因素对组织采用TPM的重要性,从而有效地利用资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering
Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: This exciting journal looks at maintenance engineering from a positive standpoint, and clarifies its recently elevatedstatus as a highly technical, scientific, and complex field. Typical areas examined include: ■Budget and control ■Equipment management ■Maintenance information systems ■Process capability and maintenance ■Process monitoring techniques ■Reliability-based maintenance ■Replacement and life cycle costs ■TQM and maintenance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信