Ethiopia and Great Powers in Final Stage of Italo-Ethiopian War (March — May 1936)

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
T. P. Nesterova
{"title":"Ethiopia and Great Powers in Final Stage of Italo-Ethiopian War (March — May 1936)","authors":"T. P. Nesterova","doi":"10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-8-438-454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the political situation that emerged in international relations after Germany’s remilitarization of the Rhineland on March 7, 1936, and the impact this event had on the development of the Italo-Ethiopian War in both political and military spheres. Published diplomatic documents from Italy, France, the Soviet Union, and the League of Nations are studied. It is argued that the introduction of German troops into the Rhineland significantly diminished the interest of major powers in the Italo-Ethiopian War and brought to the forefront their desire for “Italy’s return to Europe,” as both France and Britain were interested in involving Italy in countering Germany and protecting Austria’s independence. Based on the examined documents, it is concluded that France and Britain sought to resolve the conflict through concessions from Ethiopia, as a realistic approach to international relations led to the belief that Ethiopia could not achieve a military victory, especially after its attempt to strike at Italy’s armed forces resulted in defeat at the Battle of Maychew. The capture of Ethiopia’s capital Addis Ababa and the exile of Emperor Haile Selassie I effectively destroyed any prospects for a peaceful resolution of the conflict, despite Ethiopia’s attempts to act through the structures of the League of Nations.","PeriodicalId":43602,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnyi Dialog","volume":"33 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnyi Dialog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-8-438-454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the political situation that emerged in international relations after Germany’s remilitarization of the Rhineland on March 7, 1936, and the impact this event had on the development of the Italo-Ethiopian War in both political and military spheres. Published diplomatic documents from Italy, France, the Soviet Union, and the League of Nations are studied. It is argued that the introduction of German troops into the Rhineland significantly diminished the interest of major powers in the Italo-Ethiopian War and brought to the forefront their desire for “Italy’s return to Europe,” as both France and Britain were interested in involving Italy in countering Germany and protecting Austria’s independence. Based on the examined documents, it is concluded that France and Britain sought to resolve the conflict through concessions from Ethiopia, as a realistic approach to international relations led to the belief that Ethiopia could not achieve a military victory, especially after its attempt to strike at Italy’s armed forces resulted in defeat at the Battle of Maychew. The capture of Ethiopia’s capital Addis Ababa and the exile of Emperor Haile Selassie I effectively destroyed any prospects for a peaceful resolution of the conflict, despite Ethiopia’s attempts to act through the structures of the League of Nations.
衣索比亚战争末期的衣索比亚与列强(1936年3月至5月)
本文考察了1936年3月7日德国在莱茵兰重新军事化后国际关系中出现的政治局势,以及这一事件对意大利-埃塞俄比亚战争在政治和军事领域发展的影响。出版的外交文件从意大利,法国,苏联,以及国际联盟的研究。有人认为,德国军队进入莱茵兰大大削弱了大国在意大利-埃塞俄比亚战争中的利益,并将“意大利重返欧洲”的愿望放在了最重要的位置,因为法国和英国都对让意大利参与对抗德国和保护奥地利的独立感兴趣。根据审查的文件,得出的结论是,法国和英国试图通过埃塞俄比亚的让步来解决冲突,因为对国际关系的现实态度导致人们认为埃塞俄比亚不可能取得军事胜利,特别是在它试图打击意大利的武装部队导致在五月洲战役中失败之后。占领埃塞俄比亚首都亚的斯亚贝巴和流放海尔·塞拉西一世皇帝实际上摧毁了和平解决冲突的任何前景,尽管埃塞俄比亚试图通过国际联盟的结构采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nauchnyi Dialog
Nauchnyi Dialog HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
215
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信