Quality of life in patients after treatment of deep vein thrombosis with regional catheter thrombolysis

B. S. Sukovatykh, A. V. Sereditsky, A. Yu. Grigoryan, M. B. Sukovatykh, V. M. Pashkov
{"title":"Quality of life in patients after treatment of deep vein thrombosis with regional catheter thrombolysis","authors":"B. S. Sukovatykh, A. V. Sereditsky, A. Yu. Grigoryan, M. B. Sukovatykh, V. M. Pashkov","doi":"10.30629/0023-2149-2023-101-7-8-376-380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to compare the quality of life in patients after treatment of deep vein thrombosis with regional catheter thrombolysis using alteplase and urokinase, and to compare the results with clinical examination data. Material and methods. The assessment of quality of life and data from a control objective examination were conducted in 32 patients with deep vein thrombosis, divided into two statistically homogeneous groups of 16 individuals each. Alteplase was used for thrombolysis in the fi rst group, while urokinase was used in the second group. The quality of life in patients was evaluated using two questionnaires: SF-36 and CIVIQ-20. The severity of venous disease was determined based on the clinical assessment of venous return impairment. Results . In the fi rst group, the physical component of health according to the SF-36 questionnaire was 56 (49.5; 56.3), the psychological component was 54 (50; 68.8), while in the second group it was 34 (33; 34) and 38 (31.3; 45) respectively. The overall health assessment according to the CIVIQ-20 questionnaire was 20 (10.8; 30) in the fi rst group and 40 (32.8; 43.8) in the second group. In the clinical examination, venous return impairment was absent or mild in 75% of patients in the fi rst group, and equally distributed between mild and severe in 50% of patients in the second group. Conclusion . Alteplase thrombolysis has a more positive impact on the quality of life in patients compared to urokinase.","PeriodicalId":17856,"journal":{"name":"Klinicheskaia meditsina","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinicheskaia meditsina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30629/0023-2149-2023-101-7-8-376-380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the quality of life in patients after treatment of deep vein thrombosis with regional catheter thrombolysis using alteplase and urokinase, and to compare the results with clinical examination data. Material and methods. The assessment of quality of life and data from a control objective examination were conducted in 32 patients with deep vein thrombosis, divided into two statistically homogeneous groups of 16 individuals each. Alteplase was used for thrombolysis in the fi rst group, while urokinase was used in the second group. The quality of life in patients was evaluated using two questionnaires: SF-36 and CIVIQ-20. The severity of venous disease was determined based on the clinical assessment of venous return impairment. Results . In the fi rst group, the physical component of health according to the SF-36 questionnaire was 56 (49.5; 56.3), the psychological component was 54 (50; 68.8), while in the second group it was 34 (33; 34) and 38 (31.3; 45) respectively. The overall health assessment according to the CIVIQ-20 questionnaire was 20 (10.8; 30) in the fi rst group and 40 (32.8; 43.8) in the second group. In the clinical examination, venous return impairment was absent or mild in 75% of patients in the fi rst group, and equally distributed between mild and severe in 50% of patients in the second group. Conclusion . Alteplase thrombolysis has a more positive impact on the quality of life in patients compared to urokinase.
局部导管溶栓治疗深静脉血栓患者的生活质量
本研究的目的是比较阿替普酶和尿激酶局部导管溶栓治疗深静脉血栓患者的生活质量,并将结果与临床检查数据进行比较。材料和方法。对32例深静脉血栓患者进行生活质量评价和对照客观检查,分为两组,每组16例。第一组采用阿替普酶溶栓,第二组采用尿激酶溶栓。采用SF-36和CIVIQ-20两份问卷对患者的生活质量进行评估。根据静脉回流损害的临床评估来判断静脉疾病的严重程度。结果。第一组受试者根据SF-36问卷,身体健康成分为56分(49.5分;56.3),心理成分为54 (50;68.8),而第二组为34 (33;34)和38 (31.3;分别为45)。根据CIVIQ-20量表进行的总体健康评价为20分(10.8分;30例,40例(32.8例;43.8)为第二组。在临床检查中,第一组75%的患者无静脉回流障碍或轻度静脉回流障碍,第二组50%的患者轻度与重度静脉回流障碍平均分布。结论。与尿激酶相比,阿替普酶溶栓对患者的生活质量有更积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信