{"title":"Analysis Of Library Saleh Adiwinata User Satisfaction Using The LibQual+TM Method","authors":"Lilis Atikah, Irfan Muhajirin Anshori","doi":"10.33701/ijolib.v4i1.3375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"
 
 
 
 Background: The level of user satisfaction serves as an indicator of the effectiveness and overall performance of a library. The provision of high-quality library services plays a crucial role in attaining customer satisfaction. Quality services have the potential to deliver favorable experiences to users, enhance the accessibility of library collections, and effectively address the information requirements of users. 
 Purpose: The aim of this study is to assess overall user happiness as well as user satisfaction across various dimensions of the LibQual+TM framework 
 Method: The research methodology employed in this study is a quantitative survey method. The utilized tools align with the characteristics of the LibQual+TM technique, specifically Affect of Service, Information Control, and Library as Place. The sample parameters were determined by the utilization of accidental sampling, resulting in a total sample size of 86 respondents. 
 Result: The study of the Adequacy Gap (AG) revealed a score of 0.199, while the investigation of the Superiority Gap (SG) yielded a value of -0.216. Moreover, in terms of the dimension of Service Affect, the gap score for AG is 0.195, while for SG it is -0.181. On the dimension of Information Control, the AG score is 0.217, whereas the SG score is 0.395. During the assessment of the Library as Place dimension, the AG score was determined to be 0.163, while the SG score was found to be 0.172. 
 Conclusion: The findings indicate that users express a high level of satisfaction with the service quality provided by the Saleh Adiwinata Library. Furthermore, users perceive the service quality to be of good standard, falling within acceptable boundaries. The optimal sequence of dimensions that most effectively align with user expectations includes Information Control, Affect of Service, and Library as a Place.
 
 
 
 
 Keywords: User Satisfaction; LibQual+TM; Affect of Service; Information Control; Library as a Place
 
 
 
 
 
 Abstrak 
 
 
 
 
 Latar Belakang: Kepuasan pemustaka merupakan tolak ukur keberhasilan sebuah perpustakaan. Layanan perpustakaan yang baik merupakan salah satu faktor penting dalam mencapai kepuasan pemustaka. Layanan yang berkualitas dapat memberikan pengalaman positif kepada pemustaka, meningkatkan aksesabilitas koleksi perpustakaan, dan membantu memenuhi kebutuhan informasi penggunanya.
 Tujuan: Mengetahui kepuasan pemustaka secara umum dan kepuasan pemustaka berdasarkan dimensi LibQual+TM.
 Metode: Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode survei dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Instrumen yang digunakan sesuai dengan dimensi pada metode LibQual+TM yaitu, Affect of Service, Information Control, dan Library as Place. Penentuan kriteria sampel menggunakan accidental sampling dengan total sampel sebanyak 86 responden.
 Hasil: Berdasarkan analisis kesenjangan Adequacy Gap (AG) didapatkan skor 0,199 dan berdasarkan analisis kesenjangan Superiority Gap (SG) didapatkan skor sebesar -0,216. Lebih lanjut pada dimensi Affect of Service skor kesenjangan AG adalah 0,195 dan SG sebesar -0,181. Kemudian pada dimensi Information Control skor AG adalah 0,217 dan SG sebesar 0,395. Sementara pada dimensi Library as Place skor AG didapat 0,163 dan SG sebesar 0,172.
 Kesimpulan: Pemustaka ‘cukup puas’ terhadap kualitas pelayanan Perpustakaan Saleh Adiwinata dan pemustaka menilai bahwa kualitas layanan dapat dikategorian ‘baik’ atau berada dalam batas toleransi. Adapun urutan dimensi yang paling memenuhi harapan pemustaka adalah dimensi Information Control, Affect of Service, dan Library as Place.
 
 
 
 
 Kata kunci: Kepuasan Pemustaka; LibQual+TM; Affect of Service; Information Control; Library as Place.
 
 
 
","PeriodicalId":474477,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Librarianship","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33701/ijolib.v4i1.3375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The level of user satisfaction serves as an indicator of the effectiveness and overall performance of a library. The provision of high-quality library services plays a crucial role in attaining customer satisfaction. Quality services have the potential to deliver favorable experiences to users, enhance the accessibility of library collections, and effectively address the information requirements of users.
Purpose: The aim of this study is to assess overall user happiness as well as user satisfaction across various dimensions of the LibQual+TM framework
Method: The research methodology employed in this study is a quantitative survey method. The utilized tools align with the characteristics of the LibQual+TM technique, specifically Affect of Service, Information Control, and Library as Place. The sample parameters were determined by the utilization of accidental sampling, resulting in a total sample size of 86 respondents.
Result: The study of the Adequacy Gap (AG) revealed a score of 0.199, while the investigation of the Superiority Gap (SG) yielded a value of -0.216. Moreover, in terms of the dimension of Service Affect, the gap score for AG is 0.195, while for SG it is -0.181. On the dimension of Information Control, the AG score is 0.217, whereas the SG score is 0.395. During the assessment of the Library as Place dimension, the AG score was determined to be 0.163, while the SG score was found to be 0.172.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that users express a high level of satisfaction with the service quality provided by the Saleh Adiwinata Library. Furthermore, users perceive the service quality to be of good standard, falling within acceptable boundaries. The optimal sequence of dimensions that most effectively align with user expectations includes Information Control, Affect of Service, and Library as a Place.
Keywords: User Satisfaction; LibQual+TM; Affect of Service; Information Control; Library as a Place
Abstrak
Latar Belakang: Kepuasan pemustaka merupakan tolak ukur keberhasilan sebuah perpustakaan. Layanan perpustakaan yang baik merupakan salah satu faktor penting dalam mencapai kepuasan pemustaka. Layanan yang berkualitas dapat memberikan pengalaman positif kepada pemustaka, meningkatkan aksesabilitas koleksi perpustakaan, dan membantu memenuhi kebutuhan informasi penggunanya.
Tujuan: Mengetahui kepuasan pemustaka secara umum dan kepuasan pemustaka berdasarkan dimensi LibQual+TM.
Metode: Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode survei dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Instrumen yang digunakan sesuai dengan dimensi pada metode LibQual+TM yaitu, Affect of Service, Information Control, dan Library as Place. Penentuan kriteria sampel menggunakan accidental sampling dengan total sampel sebanyak 86 responden.
Hasil: Berdasarkan analisis kesenjangan Adequacy Gap (AG) didapatkan skor 0,199 dan berdasarkan analisis kesenjangan Superiority Gap (SG) didapatkan skor sebesar -0,216. Lebih lanjut pada dimensi Affect of Service skor kesenjangan AG adalah 0,195 dan SG sebesar -0,181. Kemudian pada dimensi Information Control skor AG adalah 0,217 dan SG sebesar 0,395. Sementara pada dimensi Library as Place skor AG didapat 0,163 dan SG sebesar 0,172.
Kesimpulan: Pemustaka ‘cukup puas’ terhadap kualitas pelayanan Perpustakaan Saleh Adiwinata dan pemustaka menilai bahwa kualitas layanan dapat dikategorian ‘baik’ atau berada dalam batas toleransi. Adapun urutan dimensi yang paling memenuhi harapan pemustaka adalah dimensi Information Control, Affect of Service, dan Library as Place.
Kata kunci: Kepuasan Pemustaka; LibQual+TM; Affect of Service; Information Control; Library as Place.
& # x0D;& # x0D;& # x0D;& # x0D;背景:用户满意度水平是图书馆有效性和整体绩效的一个指标。提供高质素的图书馆服务,对达致顾客满意至为重要。优质的服务有可能为用户提供良好的体验,提高图书馆馆藏的可及性,并有效地解决用户的信息需求。& # x0D;目的:本研究的目的是评估总体用户幸福感以及LibQual+TM框架
的各个维度的用户满意度;方法:本研究采用的研究方法为定量调查法。所使用的工具符合LibQual+TM技术的特点,特别是服务的影响、信息控制和图书馆作为场所。样本参数采用随机抽样法确定,总样本量为86人。& # x0D;结果:充分性差距(AG)的研究得分为0.199,优势差距(SG)的研究得分为-0.216。在服务影响维度上,AG的差距得分为0.195,SG的差距得分为-0.181。在信息控制维度上,AG得分为0.217,SG得分为0.395。在图书馆作为场所维度的评估中,AG得分为0.163,SG得分为0.172。& # x0D;结论:调查结果显示,使用者对Saleh Adiwinata图书馆的服务品质有较高的满意度。此外,用户认为服务质量良好,在可接受的范围内。最有效地与用户期望保持一致的维度的最佳顺序包括信息控制、服务影响和图书馆作为一个地方。
& # x0D;& # x0D;& # x0D;& # x0D;关键词:用户满意度;LibQual + TM;服务效果;信息控制;图书馆作为一个地方
& # x0D;& # x0D;& # x0D;& # x0D;& # x0D;Abstrak & # x0D;& # x0D;& # x0D;& # x0D;& # x0D;Latar Belakang: Kepuasan pemustaka merupakan tolak ukur keberhasilan sebuah perpustakaan。拉亚南的perpustakaan yang baik merupakan salah是一个很好的例子。Layanan yang berkualitas dapat memberikan pengalaman positif kepada pemustaka, meningkatkan aksesabilitas koleksi perpustakaan, dan membantu memenuhi kebutuhan informasi penggunanya.
图娟:Mengetahui kepuasan pemustaka secara umum dan kepuasan pemustaka berdasarkan dimensi LibQual+TM.
方法:测量方法,测量方法,测量方法,测量方法,测量方法。赞誉杨digunakan sesuai dengan dimensi篇metode LibQual + TM yaitu,影响服务,信息控制,丹图书馆的地方。五环标准样本孟古纳坎意外抽样邓安总样本塞班尼亚克86例响应。
Hasil: Berdasarkan analysis kesenjangan充分性差距(AG) didapatkan skor 0.199,而Berdasarkan analysis kesenjangan优势差距(SG) didapatkan skor sebesar - 0.216。[j] .中国农业大学学报(自然科学版)[j] .北京:北京大学学报(自然科学版)[j]。Kemudian pada dimension Information Control skor AG adalah 0.217和SG sebesar 0.395。Sementara pada dimensions Library as Place skor AG diapat 0,163和SG sebesar 0,172.
kespulpan: Pemustaka ' cuup puas ' terhadap kualitas pelayanan Perpustakaan Saleh Adiwinata dan Pemustaka menilai bahwa kualitas layanan dapat灾害学家' baik ' atau berada dalam batas toleransi。[j] .空间空间空间信息控制,服务的影响,以图书馆为场所[j];& # x0D;& # x0D;& # x0D;& # x0D;Kata kunci: Kepuasan Pemustaka;LibQual + TM;服务效果;信息控制;图书馆作为场所。
& # x0D;& # x0D;& # x0D;