Performance evaluation of Bailey method used in asphalt mixtures containing natural river sands

IF 4.3 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Mohammad Ahmad Alsheyab , Ahmed O. Al-sugaier , Md Lutfor Rahman , Hossein Emami Ahari
{"title":"Performance evaluation of Bailey method used in asphalt mixtures containing natural river sands","authors":"Mohammad Ahmad Alsheyab ,&nbsp;Ahmed O. Al-sugaier ,&nbsp;Md Lutfor Rahman ,&nbsp;Hossein Emami Ahari","doi":"10.1016/j.ijtst.2023.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to investigate the efficiency of the Bailey method when natural sand is included in the mix at two coarseness levels of aggregate gradations: fine-graded (FG) and coarse-graided (CG), and three mixes with varing percentages of the natural river sand were prepared at each coarseness level, namely: CG with quarry sand only (CG-QS), CG with natural sands only (CG-NS), CG with quarry and natural sands (CG-QNS), FG with quarry sand only (FG-QS), FG with natural sands only (FG-NS), and FG with quarry and natural sands (CG-QNS). The portions of the natural sand either in CG-QNS and FG-QNS mixes were minimized as possible without violating the Bailey ratios. Four performance tests were utilized to evaluate the mixes including indirect tensile tension test (IDEAL-CT), disk‐shaped compact tension test (DCT), flow number (<em>FN</em>) test, and tensile strength ratio (<em>TSR</em>) test. The sensitivity and the significance of the volumetric measures were investigated including voids of total mix (<em>VTM</em>), voids of mineral aggregate (<em>VMA</em>), dust proportion (<em>DP</em>), voids filled with asphalt (<em>VFA</em>), air voids volume (<em>V</em><sub>a</sub>), and effective binder volume (<em>V</em><sub>be</sub>), and a number of non-linear statistical models were developed. The results of IDEAL-CT, DCT, and <em>FN</em> test were consistent where CG-QNS had the best performance, followed by CG-QS, CG-NS, FG-QS, FG-QNS, and lastly FG-NS. <em>TSR</em> value was always decreasing with the increase in the percentage of the natural river. <em>V</em><sub>be</sub> was the most significant volumetric measure followed and was used to predict the performance test indices.<!--> <em>FN</em> test had the highest coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>) when modeled with any of the other performance tests, while <em>TSR</em> test had the lowest. The Bailey gradation method was successfully proficient to provide a similar gradation coarseness for CG-QNS when compared to CG-QS which indicates a similar aggregate interlock.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52282,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology","volume":"16 ","pages":"Pages 50-67"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2046043023000850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the efficiency of the Bailey method when natural sand is included in the mix at two coarseness levels of aggregate gradations: fine-graded (FG) and coarse-graided (CG), and three mixes with varing percentages of the natural river sand were prepared at each coarseness level, namely: CG with quarry sand only (CG-QS), CG with natural sands only (CG-NS), CG with quarry and natural sands (CG-QNS), FG with quarry sand only (FG-QS), FG with natural sands only (FG-NS), and FG with quarry and natural sands (CG-QNS). The portions of the natural sand either in CG-QNS and FG-QNS mixes were minimized as possible without violating the Bailey ratios. Four performance tests were utilized to evaluate the mixes including indirect tensile tension test (IDEAL-CT), disk‐shaped compact tension test (DCT), flow number (FN) test, and tensile strength ratio (TSR) test. The sensitivity and the significance of the volumetric measures were investigated including voids of total mix (VTM), voids of mineral aggregate (VMA), dust proportion (DP), voids filled with asphalt (VFA), air voids volume (Va), and effective binder volume (Vbe), and a number of non-linear statistical models were developed. The results of IDEAL-CT, DCT, and FN test were consistent where CG-QNS had the best performance, followed by CG-QS, CG-NS, FG-QS, FG-QNS, and lastly FG-NS. TSR value was always decreasing with the increase in the percentage of the natural river. Vbe was the most significant volumetric measure followed and was used to predict the performance test indices. FN test had the highest coefficient of determination (R2) when modeled with any of the other performance tests, while TSR test had the lowest. The Bailey gradation method was successfully proficient to provide a similar gradation coarseness for CG-QNS when compared to CG-QS which indicates a similar aggregate interlock.
含天然河砂沥青混合料的贝利法性能评价
本研究旨在考察在细级配(FG)和粗级配(CG)两种骨料级配粗度水平下混合天然砂时Bailey法的效率,并在每个粗度水平下制备三种随天然河砂百分比变化的混合料,即:只含采石场砂的骨灰分级(CG-QS)、只含天然砂的骨灰分级(CG-NS)、只含采石场砂的骨灰分级(CG-QNS)、只含采石场砂的骨灰分级(FG-QS)、只含天然砂的骨灰分级(FG-NS)和只含采石场砂的骨灰分级(CG-QNS)。在不违反贝利比的情况下,CG-QNS和FG-QNS混合物中天然砂的比例都尽可能地最小化。使用四种性能测试来评估混合料,包括间接拉伸张力测试(IDEAL-CT)、圆盘形致密拉伸测试(DCT)、流动数(FN)和拉伸强度比(TSR)。研究了总掺合物空隙率(VTM)、矿物集料空隙率(VMA)、粉尘比(DP)、沥青填充空隙率(VFA)、空气空隙体积(Va)和有效粘结剂体积(Vbe)等体积指标的敏感性和重要性,并建立了非线性统计模型。理想ct、DCT和FN的结果一致,CG-QNS表现最好,其次是CG-QS、CG-NS、FG-QS、FG-QNS,最后是FG-NS。TSR值随河道天然砂的增加而减小。Vbe是最显著的容积度量,用于预测性能测试指标。FN的决定系数(R2)最高,TSR的决定系数最低。当使用任何其他性能测试建模时,FN具有最高的R2,而TSR具有最低的R2。与CG-QS相比,Bailey分级方法成功地为CG-QNS提供了相似的分级粗度,这表明了相似的聚集互锁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology
International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
88 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信