Management Implications for HR Analytics in Light of Systems Theory

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Alexandre Ricardo Peres, Edson Luiz Riccio, ernando José Laurindo
{"title":"Management Implications for HR Analytics in Light of Systems Theory","authors":"Alexandre Ricardo Peres, Edson Luiz Riccio, ernando José Laurindo","doi":"10.14571/brajets.v16.n2.307-329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 2000s, the HR Analytics field has experienced a steady growth in published works, with a variety of focus, but aiming the value added to HR Management. Recently, the literature has been increasingly focused on factors to be considered in HR Analytics frameworks, suggesting the question of “how” HR Analytics should be put into practice and drove by objectives; unlike initial (but still abundant) approaches of “what” should be done. This paper aims to address gaps that could help setting management resources, researching if there are relevant nuances in HR Analytics objectives that may imply in distinct ways to manage the activity. Two main approaches were combined: (i) a quantitative and qualitative analysis of recent publications and (ii) an approach under the Systems Theory constructs. HR Analytics definitions, approaches, underlying themes, related areas of study and academic gaps were analyzed from 231 publications in the Scopus database until 2021. The analysis highlighted main features of interest, which were clustered and drove to the drawing of distinct (but related) objectives and ways of manage HR Analytics. Moreover, comparisons with knowledge creation of correlated activities led to the proposition of a taxonomy as a driver to objectives and a research agenda.","PeriodicalId":40275,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos Educacao Tecnologia e Sociedade","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos Educacao Tecnologia e Sociedade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.n2.307-329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the 2000s, the HR Analytics field has experienced a steady growth in published works, with a variety of focus, but aiming the value added to HR Management. Recently, the literature has been increasingly focused on factors to be considered in HR Analytics frameworks, suggesting the question of “how” HR Analytics should be put into practice and drove by objectives; unlike initial (but still abundant) approaches of “what” should be done. This paper aims to address gaps that could help setting management resources, researching if there are relevant nuances in HR Analytics objectives that may imply in distinct ways to manage the activity. Two main approaches were combined: (i) a quantitative and qualitative analysis of recent publications and (ii) an approach under the Systems Theory constructs. HR Analytics definitions, approaches, underlying themes, related areas of study and academic gaps were analyzed from 231 publications in the Scopus database until 2021. The analysis highlighted main features of interest, which were clustered and drove to the drawing of distinct (but related) objectives and ways of manage HR Analytics. Moreover, comparisons with knowledge creation of correlated activities led to the proposition of a taxonomy as a driver to objectives and a research agenda.
系统理论对人力资源分析的管理启示
自2000年代以来,人力资源分析领域的出版作品稳步增长,其重点多种多样,但目标是为人力资源管理增加价值。最近,文献越来越多地关注人力资源分析框架中要考虑的因素,提出了“如何”将人力资源分析付诸实践并由目标驱动的问题;不像最初的(但仍然丰富的)“应该做什么”的方法。本文旨在解决可能有助于设置管理资源的差距,研究人力资源分析目标中是否存在相关的细微差别,这些细微差别可能意味着以不同的方式管理活动。本文结合了两种主要方法:(i)对近期出版物进行定量和定性分析;(ii)在系统论框架下的方法。人力资源分析的定义、方法、基本主题、相关研究领域和学术差距从Scopus数据库中的231份出版物中进行了分析,直到2021年。分析强调了感兴趣的主要特征,这些特征被聚集起来,并推动了不同的(但相关的)目标和管理人力资源分析的方法。此外,与相关活动的知识创造的比较导致了分类法作为目标和研究议程驱动因素的命题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cadernos Educacao Tecnologia e Sociedade
Cadernos Educacao Tecnologia e Sociedade EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信