Click It: The Effect of Integrating Socrative and KWL on Students’ Academic Reading Comprehension

Dewi Nur Suci, Merliyani Putri Anggraini, Ary Ningrum, Inas Nadifah, Qoidatul Marhumah
{"title":"Click It: The Effect of Integrating Socrative and KWL on Students’ Academic Reading Comprehension","authors":"Dewi Nur Suci, Merliyani Putri Anggraini, Ary Ningrum, Inas Nadifah, Qoidatul Marhumah","doi":"10.33394/jollt.v11i4.8910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Socrative as one of educational technologies provides the students an ease to learn language through reading activities. They can practice reading on screen as the students in global era have commonly familiarized with. However, the teacher can apply certain reading strategies for students’ understandings on materials when trying to integrate technology for reading. Thus, this research proposes to investigate the effectiveness of Socrative and Moodle in reading classrooms that employ Kow-Want to Know-Learned (KWL) strategy. By using causal comparative study, seventy students of English Department at one of Islamic state universities in East Java Indonesia who are in the third semester are divided into intervention and control groups. The previous group is directed to read by using Moodle and do quiz with Socrative, while the latter read and do the quiz in Moodle. Here, KWL strategy is integrated with both technologies. The results of study exemplify that there is no significance difference between the students in the intervention and the control group. However, the mean scores of posttest on the intervention group increased better than the control group.","PeriodicalId":33956,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Languages and Language Teaching","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Languages and Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i4.8910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Socrative as one of educational technologies provides the students an ease to learn language through reading activities. They can practice reading on screen as the students in global era have commonly familiarized with. However, the teacher can apply certain reading strategies for students’ understandings on materials when trying to integrate technology for reading. Thus, this research proposes to investigate the effectiveness of Socrative and Moodle in reading classrooms that employ Kow-Want to Know-Learned (KWL) strategy. By using causal comparative study, seventy students of English Department at one of Islamic state universities in East Java Indonesia who are in the third semester are divided into intervention and control groups. The previous group is directed to read by using Moodle and do quiz with Socrative, while the latter read and do the quiz in Moodle. Here, KWL strategy is integrated with both technologies. The results of study exemplify that there is no significance difference between the students in the intervention and the control group. However, the mean scores of posttest on the intervention group increased better than the control group.
点击它:整合苏格拉底和KWL对学生学术阅读理解的影响
苏格拉底作为一种教育技术,通过阅读活动为学生提供了一种轻松学习语言的方式。他们可以在屏幕上练习阅读,这是全球化时代的学生普遍熟悉的。然而,教师在尝试整合阅读技术时,可以针对学生对材料的理解运用一定的阅读策略。因此,本研究提出调查Socrative和Moodle在采用Kow-Want - Know-Learned (KWL)策略的阅读课堂中的有效性。采用因果对比研究的方法,将印度尼西亚东爪哇一所伊斯兰州立大学英语系第三学期的70名学生分为干预组和对照组。前一组使用Moodle阅读并使用Socrative做测验,后一组使用Moodle阅读并做测验。在这里,KWL战略与这两种技术相结合。研究结果表明,干预组学生与对照组之间无显著性差异。干预组后测平均分的提高明显优于对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信