An assessment of blockchain academia and news developments: a bibliometric and text-mining analysis

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 0 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Chien-Wen Shen, Phung Phi Tran
{"title":"An assessment of blockchain academia and news developments: a bibliometric and text-mining analysis","authors":"Chien-Wen Shen, Phung Phi Tran","doi":"10.1108/lht-10-2022-0473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to provide a more complete picture of blockchain development by combining numerous methodologies with diverse data sources, such as academic papers and news articles. This study displays the developmental status of each subject based on the interrelationships of each topic cluster by analyzing high-frequency keywords extracted from the collected data. Moreover, applying above methodologies will help understanding top research topics, authors, venues, institutes and countries. The differences of blockchain research and new are identified. Design/methodology/approach To identify and find blockchain development linkages, researchers have used search terms such as co-occurrence, bibliographic coupling, co-citation and co-authorship to help us understand the top research topics, authors, venues, institutes and countries. This study also used text mining analysis to identify blockchain articles' primary concepts and semantic structures. Findings The findings show the fundamental topics based on each topic cluster's links. While “technology”, “transaction”, “privacy and security”, “environment” and “consensus” were most strongly associated with blockchain in research, “platform”, “big data and cloud”, “network”, “healthcare and business” and “authentication” were closely tied to blockchain news. This article classifies blockchain principles into five patterns: hardware and infrastructure, data, networking, applications and consensus. These statistics helped the authors comprehend the top research topics, authors, venues, publication institutes and countries. Research limitations/implications Since Web of Science (WoS) and LexisNexis Academic data are used, the study has few sources. Others advise merging foreign datasets. WoS is one of the world's largest and most-used databases for assessing scientific papers. Originality/value This study has several uses and benefits. First, key concept discoveries can help academics understand blockchain research trends so they can prioritize research initiatives. Second, bibliographic coupling links academic papers on blockchain. It helps information seekers search and classify the material. Co-citation analysis results can help researchers identify potential partners and leaders in their field. The network's key organizations or countries should be proactive in discovering, proposing and creating new relationships with other organizations or countries, especially those from the journal network's border, to make the overall network more integrated and linked. Prominent members help recruit new authors to organizations or countries and link them to the co-authorship network. This study also used concept-linking analysis to identify blockchain articles' primary concepts and semantic structures. This may lead to new authors developing research ideas or subjects in primary disciplines of inquiry.","PeriodicalId":47196,"journal":{"name":"Library Hi Tech","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Hi Tech","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-10-2022-0473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to provide a more complete picture of blockchain development by combining numerous methodologies with diverse data sources, such as academic papers and news articles. This study displays the developmental status of each subject based on the interrelationships of each topic cluster by analyzing high-frequency keywords extracted from the collected data. Moreover, applying above methodologies will help understanding top research topics, authors, venues, institutes and countries. The differences of blockchain research and new are identified. Design/methodology/approach To identify and find blockchain development linkages, researchers have used search terms such as co-occurrence, bibliographic coupling, co-citation and co-authorship to help us understand the top research topics, authors, venues, institutes and countries. This study also used text mining analysis to identify blockchain articles' primary concepts and semantic structures. Findings The findings show the fundamental topics based on each topic cluster's links. While “technology”, “transaction”, “privacy and security”, “environment” and “consensus” were most strongly associated with blockchain in research, “platform”, “big data and cloud”, “network”, “healthcare and business” and “authentication” were closely tied to blockchain news. This article classifies blockchain principles into five patterns: hardware and infrastructure, data, networking, applications and consensus. These statistics helped the authors comprehend the top research topics, authors, venues, publication institutes and countries. Research limitations/implications Since Web of Science (WoS) and LexisNexis Academic data are used, the study has few sources. Others advise merging foreign datasets. WoS is one of the world's largest and most-used databases for assessing scientific papers. Originality/value This study has several uses and benefits. First, key concept discoveries can help academics understand blockchain research trends so they can prioritize research initiatives. Second, bibliographic coupling links academic papers on blockchain. It helps information seekers search and classify the material. Co-citation analysis results can help researchers identify potential partners and leaders in their field. The network's key organizations or countries should be proactive in discovering, proposing and creating new relationships with other organizations or countries, especially those from the journal network's border, to make the overall network more integrated and linked. Prominent members help recruit new authors to organizations or countries and link them to the co-authorship network. This study also used concept-linking analysis to identify blockchain articles' primary concepts and semantic structures. This may lead to new authors developing research ideas or subjects in primary disciplines of inquiry.
区块链学术和新闻发展评估:文献计量学和文本挖掘分析
本研究旨在通过将多种方法与不同的数据源(如学术论文和新闻文章)相结合,提供区块链发展的更完整图景。本研究通过对收集数据中提取的高频关键词进行分析,根据每个主题聚类之间的相互关系来展示每个主题的发展状况。此外,应用上述方法将有助于了解热门研究课题、作者、地点、机构和国家。确定了区块链研究与新技术的差异。为了识别和发现区块链发展联系,研究人员使用了共现、书目耦合、共引和合著等搜索术语来帮助我们了解顶级研究主题、作者、地点、机构和国家。本研究还使用文本挖掘分析来识别区块链文章的主要概念和语义结构。这些发现显示了基于每个主题集群的链接的基本主题。“技术”、“交易”、“隐私与安全”、“环境”和“共识”在研究中与区块链联系最为密切,而“平台”、“大数据与云”、“网络”、“医疗与商业”和“认证”与区块链新闻联系最为密切。本文将区块链原则分为五种模式:硬件和基础设施、数据、网络、应用和共识。这些统计数据有助于作者了解顶级研究课题、作者、地点、出版机构和国家。由于使用了Web of Science (WoS)和LexisNexis的学术数据,因此本研究的来源很少。其他人则建议合并国外的数据集。WoS是世界上最大和最常用的科学论文评估数据库之一。这项研究有几个用途和好处。首先,关键概念的发现可以帮助学者了解区块链研究趋势,以便他们可以优先考虑研究计划。第二,书目耦合链接区块链学术论文。它帮助信息搜寻者搜索和分类材料。共引分析结果可以帮助研究人员识别潜在的合作伙伴和各自领域的领导者。网络的重点组织或国家应积极主动地发现、提出和建立与其他组织或国家的新关系,特别是与期刊网络边界的组织或国家的新关系,使整个网络更加整合和联系。知名成员帮助组织或国家招募新作者,并将他们连接到合作作者网络。本研究还使用概念链接分析来识别区块链文章的主要概念和语义结构。这可能会导致新作者在初级学科中发展研究思路或主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Library Hi Tech
Library Hi Tech INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
44.10%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: ■Integrated library systems ■Networking ■Strategic planning ■Policy implementation across entire institutions ■Security ■Automation systems ■The role of consortia ■Resource access initiatives ■Architecture and technology ■Electronic publishing ■Library technology in specific countries ■User perspectives on technology ■How technology can help disabled library users ■Library-related web sites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信