“Who am I? What am I doing?” The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on work identities

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Mani Pillai
{"title":"“Who am I? What am I doing?” The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on work identities","authors":"Mani Pillai","doi":"10.1108/er-01-2023-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose As every day work is central to people's lives and events serve as significant contextual factors, examining what impact the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic restrictions had on knowledge workers warrants further investigation. The author's research question investigated how employees in the London Insurance Market had made sense of their work identities during a period of mandated remote work and isolation from co-workers, leaders and others, amidst a turbulent environment. To address this enquiry, this research drew on Goffman's institutional, dramaturgical and stigma theories. Design/methodology/approach Data used in this research are from an ongoing PhD study of how individuals conceive, construct and conduct their careers in this field. As individuals and their social worlds are interwoven, a qualitative methodological approach was employed in this research. Findings Participants were thrusted into a position where they had no prior knowledge what identity they should adopt in a situation which had totalising characteristics. The loss of clear boundaries between work and home setting caused a deterioration of participants' work identities whilst physical separation from their institutions and co-workers posed a risk of disconnecting their past work identities from the present. Moreover, participants' experiences of deterioration and disconnection were intertwined with their demographic and occupational identities. Originality/value This study aligns with existing research on identity work, emphasising the crucial role of social interaction in the formation of work identities. However, it also highlights that the establishment and sustenance of work identities is also reliant on individuals having separate frontstage and backstage settings to understand and interpret their conduct and those of their significant others.","PeriodicalId":47857,"journal":{"name":"Employee Relations","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/er-01-2023-0048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose As every day work is central to people's lives and events serve as significant contextual factors, examining what impact the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic restrictions had on knowledge workers warrants further investigation. The author's research question investigated how employees in the London Insurance Market had made sense of their work identities during a period of mandated remote work and isolation from co-workers, leaders and others, amidst a turbulent environment. To address this enquiry, this research drew on Goffman's institutional, dramaturgical and stigma theories. Design/methodology/approach Data used in this research are from an ongoing PhD study of how individuals conceive, construct and conduct their careers in this field. As individuals and their social worlds are interwoven, a qualitative methodological approach was employed in this research. Findings Participants were thrusted into a position where they had no prior knowledge what identity they should adopt in a situation which had totalising characteristics. The loss of clear boundaries between work and home setting caused a deterioration of participants' work identities whilst physical separation from their institutions and co-workers posed a risk of disconnecting their past work identities from the present. Moreover, participants' experiences of deterioration and disconnection were intertwined with their demographic and occupational identities. Originality/value This study aligns with existing research on identity work, emphasising the crucial role of social interaction in the formation of work identities. However, it also highlights that the establishment and sustenance of work identities is also reliant on individuals having separate frontstage and backstage settings to understand and interpret their conduct and those of their significant others.
“我是谁?”我在做什么?”COVID-19大流行对工作身份的影响
由于日常工作是人们生活的核心,事件是重要的背景因素,因此有必要进一步调查2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行限制对知识工作者的影响。作者的研究问题是,在动荡的环境中,伦敦保险市场(London Insurance Market)的员工在强制远程工作、与同事、领导和其他人隔离的时期,如何理解自己的工作身份。为了解决这个问题,本研究借鉴了戈夫曼的制度理论、戏剧理论和耻辱理论。本研究中使用的数据来自一项正在进行的博士研究,该研究是关于个人如何在这个领域构思、构建和开展他们的职业生涯。由于个人和他们的社会世界是交织在一起的,本研究采用了定性的方法方法。研究结果参与者被推到一个位置,在那里他们没有事先的知识,他们应该采取什么样的身份,在一个情况下,有综合的特点。工作和家庭环境之间的明确界限的丧失导致参与者的工作身份恶化,而与他们的机构和同事的物理分离则有可能使他们过去的工作身份与现在的工作身份脱节。此外,参与者的退化和脱节经历与他们的人口和职业身份交织在一起。这项研究与现有的认同工作研究一致,强调社会互动在工作认同形成中的关键作用。然而,它也强调了工作身份的建立和维持也依赖于个人有单独的前台和后台设置来理解和解释他们的行为和他们重要的其他人的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Employee Relations
Employee Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.80%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: ■Communication, participation and involvement ■Developments in collective bargaining ■Equal opportunities ■Health and safety ■HRM ■Industrial relations and employment protection law ■Industrial relations management and reform ■Organizational change and people ■Personnel and recruitment ■Quality of working life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信