Comparative Evaluation of Routine Laboratory Tests (Based on Cell Ratios) in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Coronavirus Infection and Acute Pulmonary Non-Coronavirus Infection in Zabol City

Soleyman Saravani, Mohammad Okati, Hamid Reza Ghaffari, Bahman Fouladi, Javad Poursamimi
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Routine Laboratory Tests (Based on Cell Ratios) in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Coronavirus Infection and Acute Pulmonary Non-Coronavirus Infection in Zabol City","authors":"Soleyman Saravani, Mohammad Okati, Hamid Reza Ghaffari, Bahman Fouladi, Javad Poursamimi","doi":"10.18502/jzms.v6i1.13603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Acute respiratory infections are caused by a wide range of viruses. Respiratory spread is the main process of disease transmission. In this study we evaluated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) indices.
 Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on patients-files between September 2019 and March 2021. 102 patients were evaluated. 26 men and 30 women were included in the acute coronary group, 16 men and 30 women were included in the non-acute coronary group.
 Results: The mean age of women (53.0 ± 1.9) was higher than that of men (50.2 ± 2.02) in the acute COVID-19 group. The mean NLR index in COVID-19 men (1.65 ± 7.47) was higher than non- COVID-19 men (6.7 ± 1.54). It was also higher in COVID-19 women (10.78 ± 2.54) than non- COVID-19 women (7.9 ± 1.24) (p value > 0.05).The PLR index of COVID-19 men (15.43 ± 2.85) was lower than non- COVID-19 men (15.48 ± 3.48). However, this index was lower in COVID-19 women (22.5 ± 3.36) than non- COVID-19 women (25.2 ± 4.2) (p value > 0.05). The mean of MLR index in COVID-19 men (0.16 ± 0.025) was less than that in COVID-19 women (0.26 ± 0.03) (p value > 0.05). The mean MLR index in non- COVID-19 men (0.22 ± 0.04) was lower than that in non- COVID-19 women (0.23 ± 0.02) (p value > 0.05). The mean MLR index in the COVID-19 men (0.16 ± 0.025) was lower than non- COVID-19 men (0.22 ± 0.04). This index was higher in COVID-19 women (0.26 ± 0.03) than non- COVID-19 women (0.23 ± 0.02) (p value > 0.05).
 Conclusion: The changes in NLR, PLR and MLR indices were in accordance with global studies but were not significant. This may be due to immune responses of patients and laboratory errors (sampling and performing techniques).","PeriodicalId":496933,"journal":{"name":"مجله دانشکده پزشکی زابل","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"مجله دانشکده پزشکی زابل","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jzms.v6i1.13603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory infections are caused by a wide range of viruses. Respiratory spread is the main process of disease transmission. In this study we evaluated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) indices. Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on patients-files between September 2019 and March 2021. 102 patients were evaluated. 26 men and 30 women were included in the acute coronary group, 16 men and 30 women were included in the non-acute coronary group. Results: The mean age of women (53.0 ± 1.9) was higher than that of men (50.2 ± 2.02) in the acute COVID-19 group. The mean NLR index in COVID-19 men (1.65 ± 7.47) was higher than non- COVID-19 men (6.7 ± 1.54). It was also higher in COVID-19 women (10.78 ± 2.54) than non- COVID-19 women (7.9 ± 1.24) (p value > 0.05).The PLR index of COVID-19 men (15.43 ± 2.85) was lower than non- COVID-19 men (15.48 ± 3.48). However, this index was lower in COVID-19 women (22.5 ± 3.36) than non- COVID-19 women (25.2 ± 4.2) (p value > 0.05). The mean of MLR index in COVID-19 men (0.16 ± 0.025) was less than that in COVID-19 women (0.26 ± 0.03) (p value > 0.05). The mean MLR index in non- COVID-19 men (0.22 ± 0.04) was lower than that in non- COVID-19 women (0.23 ± 0.02) (p value > 0.05). The mean MLR index in the COVID-19 men (0.16 ± 0.025) was lower than non- COVID-19 men (0.22 ± 0.04). This index was higher in COVID-19 women (0.26 ± 0.03) than non- COVID-19 women (0.23 ± 0.02) (p value > 0.05). Conclusion: The changes in NLR, PLR and MLR indices were in accordance with global studies but were not significant. This may be due to immune responses of patients and laboratory errors (sampling and performing techniques).
扎博尔市急性肺冠状病毒感染与急性肺非冠状病毒感染常规实验室检测(基于细胞比例)的比较评价
背景:急性呼吸道感染是由多种病毒引起的。呼吸道传播是疾病传播的主要途径。在这项研究中,我们评估了中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)和单核细胞与淋巴细胞比率(MLR)指数。方法:对2019年9月至2021年3月期间的患者档案进行描述性分析研究。对102例患者进行了评估。急性冠状动脉组分为男性26例,女性30例;非急性冠状动脉组分为男性16例,女性30例。结果:急性组女性平均年龄(53.0±1.9)岁高于男性(50.2±2.02)岁。新冠肺炎男性NLR指数(1.65±7.47)高于非新冠肺炎男性(6.7±1.54)。COVID-19女性(10.78±2.54)高于非COVID-19女性(7.9±1.24)(p值>0.05)。新冠男性PLR指数(15.43±2.85)低于非新冠男性(15.48±3.48)。但新冠肺炎女性的该指标(22.5±3.36)低于非新冠肺炎女性(25.2±4.2)(p值>0.05)。男性患者MLR指数平均值(0.16±0.025)小于女性患者(0.26±0.03)(p值>0.05)。非COVID-19男性的平均MLR指数(0.22±0.04)低于非COVID-19女性的平均MLR指数(0.23±0.02)(p值>0.05)。新冠肺炎男性的平均MLR指数(0.16±0.025)低于非新冠肺炎男性(0.22±0.04)。新冠肺炎女性的该指标(0.26±0.03)高于非新冠肺炎女性(0.23±0.02)(p值>0.05)强生# x0D;结论:NLR、PLR和MLR指标的变化与全球研究一致,但差异不显著。这可能是由于患者的免疫反应和实验室错误(采样和执行技术)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信