Ahmad Rastgarian, Khatereh Dehghani, Shahram Shafa, Mohammad Sadegh Sanie Jahromi, Mansour Deylami, Soha Azizi, Mohammad Zarenezhad, Kaveh Hedayati Emami, Vahid Rahmanian, Tayyebeh Zarei, Navid Kalani
{"title":"Puncture site bleeding complications of peripheral nerve block in patients taking antithrombotic and anticoagulant drugs: An umbrella review","authors":"Ahmad Rastgarian, Khatereh Dehghani, Shahram Shafa, Mohammad Sadegh Sanie Jahromi, Mansour Deylami, Soha Azizi, Mohammad Zarenezhad, Kaveh Hedayati Emami, Vahid Rahmanian, Tayyebeh Zarei, Navid Kalani","doi":"10.31661/gmj.v12i.2958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"background: While there are multiple guidelines for the management of bleeding complications and hematoma if being treated with antithrombotic and anticoagulant drugs, these risks are not yet stratified for procedures with regional anesthesia. Materials and Methods: This study was an umbrella review of systematic studies and meta-analysis based on PRISMA guidelines in databases of Scopus, PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Due to heterogeneity in evaluated outcomes and methods of studies, only the qualitative evidence synthesis was performed. AMSTAR checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in included systematic reviews. Results: After an extensive search of relevant studies, 971 primary cases were identified. Following a thorough screening process, 5 systematic reviews were selected. The evidence suggests that head and neck punctures generally do not result in bleeding complications, except for rare cases of hematoma associated with Infraclavicular brachial plexus block. A deep cervical plexus block is not recommended. Interscalene blocks have varying findings, with some studies reporting hematoma incidence and spinal injury, while others consider them low risk. Supraclavicular brachial plexus block might be associated with hemothorax and infraclavicular blocks are not favored by reviews. Axillary brachial plexus blocks have a minor incidence of hematoma. Abdomen blocks, TAP blocks, ilioinguinal blocks, and rectus sheath blocks carry a higher risk of hematoma. Pectoral nerve (PECS) blocks have a relatively high risk, while paravertebral and intercostal blocks are considered high risk, but further research is needed regarding paravertebral blocks. Conclusion: The available evidence from systematic reviews and studies suggests varying levels of risk for different blocks and procedures that should be considered before decision-making.","PeriodicalId":44017,"journal":{"name":"Galen Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Galen Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v12i.2958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
background: While there are multiple guidelines for the management of bleeding complications and hematoma if being treated with antithrombotic and anticoagulant drugs, these risks are not yet stratified for procedures with regional anesthesia. Materials and Methods: This study was an umbrella review of systematic studies and meta-analysis based on PRISMA guidelines in databases of Scopus, PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Due to heterogeneity in evaluated outcomes and methods of studies, only the qualitative evidence synthesis was performed. AMSTAR checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in included systematic reviews. Results: After an extensive search of relevant studies, 971 primary cases were identified. Following a thorough screening process, 5 systematic reviews were selected. The evidence suggests that head and neck punctures generally do not result in bleeding complications, except for rare cases of hematoma associated with Infraclavicular brachial plexus block. A deep cervical plexus block is not recommended. Interscalene blocks have varying findings, with some studies reporting hematoma incidence and spinal injury, while others consider them low risk. Supraclavicular brachial plexus block might be associated with hemothorax and infraclavicular blocks are not favored by reviews. Axillary brachial plexus blocks have a minor incidence of hematoma. Abdomen blocks, TAP blocks, ilioinguinal blocks, and rectus sheath blocks carry a higher risk of hematoma. Pectoral nerve (PECS) blocks have a relatively high risk, while paravertebral and intercostal blocks are considered high risk, but further research is needed regarding paravertebral blocks. Conclusion: The available evidence from systematic reviews and studies suggests varying levels of risk for different blocks and procedures that should be considered before decision-making.
背景:虽然对于使用抗血栓和抗凝药物治疗的出血并发症和血肿的管理有多种指南,但这些风险尚未对区域麻醉手术进行分层。材料和方法:本研究是对Scopus、PubMed、Medline、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库中基于PRISMA指南的系统研究和荟萃分析的总称综述。由于评估结果和研究方法的异质性,仅进行了定性证据综合。AMSTAR检查表用于评估纳入系统评价的偏倚风险。结果:在广泛检索相关研究后,确定了971例原发病例。经过彻底的筛选过程,选择了5个系统评价。有证据表明,头颈部穿刺通常不会导致出血并发症,除了罕见的锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞血肿病例。不推荐深颈神经丛阻滞。斜角肌间阻滞有不同的结果,一些研究报告血肿发生率和脊髓损伤,而另一些研究认为其风险低。锁骨上臂丛阻滞可能与血胸有关,而锁骨下阻滞不受文献回顾的青睐。腋窝臂丛阻滞有轻微的血肿发生率。腹部阻滞、TAP阻滞、髂腹股沟阻滞和直肌鞘阻滞具有较高的血肿风险。胸神经阻滞的危险性较高,椎旁阻滞和肋间阻滞的危险性较高,但椎旁阻滞的危险性有待进一步研究。结论:来自系统评价和研究的现有证据表明,在决策之前应考虑不同块和程序的不同风险水平。
期刊介绍:
GMJ is open access, peer-reviewed journal in English and supported by Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD) Research Center of Fasa University of Medical Sciences that publishing by Salvia Medical Sciences Ltd. GMJ will consider all types of the following scientific papers for publication: - Editorial’s choice - Original Researches - Review articles - Case reports - Case series - Letter (to editors, to authors, etc) - Short communications - Medical Idea