Relationship between nurses' perceptions of the benefits/challenges of nursing and degree of interprofessional and intraprofessional collaboration in all-inclusive services combining day services, overnight stays and home-visit nursing for the older people living at home

IF 1.8 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nobuko Katahira PhD, RN, Satomi Maruo DSN, RN
{"title":"Relationship between nurses' perceptions of the benefits/challenges of nursing and degree of interprofessional and intraprofessional collaboration in all-inclusive services combining day services, overnight stays and home-visit nursing for the older people living at home","authors":"Nobuko Katahira PhD, RN,&nbsp;Satomi Maruo DSN, RN","doi":"10.1002/jgf2.655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Many countries are experiencing rapid population aging, and the provision of support for older adults with diseases or disabilities to continue living in their communities is a major global challenge. Japan has established multifunctional long-term care in small group homes and home-visit nursing (MLSH) as a service category that integrates medical and care services. These services focus on nursing functions to support continuous, long-term home, and end-of-life care for older adults with high levels of medical care dependency. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between nurses' perceptions of nursing benefits/challenges and the degree of interprofessional collaboration in the context of MLSH.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a mail questionnaire survey of MLSH facilities throughout Japan. All facilities in Japan that had been operating for at least 1 year were included. We analyzed 182 responses (response rate: 36.0%; valid response rate: 98.3%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Comparison of scores representing the degree of interprofessional collaboration perceived by nurses showed the highest score was for colleague nurses (3.9 ± 0.5) and the lowest was for external care managers (2.5 ± 0.9). Compared with the weak collaboration group, the strong collaboration group had higher perceptions of the benefits of nursing and lower perceptions of the challenges.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The results of this study suggest that strong collaboration allows teams to achieve sufficient effects of care while reducing related challenges. It may be necessary to promote collaboration with external professionals to appropriately manage service users' worsened conditions and improve the quality of care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgf2.655","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgf2.655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Many countries are experiencing rapid population aging, and the provision of support for older adults with diseases or disabilities to continue living in their communities is a major global challenge. Japan has established multifunctional long-term care in small group homes and home-visit nursing (MLSH) as a service category that integrates medical and care services. These services focus on nursing functions to support continuous, long-term home, and end-of-life care for older adults with high levels of medical care dependency. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between nurses' perceptions of nursing benefits/challenges and the degree of interprofessional collaboration in the context of MLSH.

Methods

We conducted a mail questionnaire survey of MLSH facilities throughout Japan. All facilities in Japan that had been operating for at least 1 year were included. We analyzed 182 responses (response rate: 36.0%; valid response rate: 98.3%).

Results

Comparison of scores representing the degree of interprofessional collaboration perceived by nurses showed the highest score was for colleague nurses (3.9 ± 0.5) and the lowest was for external care managers (2.5 ± 0.9). Compared with the weak collaboration group, the strong collaboration group had higher perceptions of the benefits of nursing and lower perceptions of the challenges.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that strong collaboration allows teams to achieve sufficient effects of care while reducing related challenges. It may be necessary to promote collaboration with external professionals to appropriately manage service users' worsened conditions and improve the quality of care.

护士对护理工作的益处/挑战的看法与为居家老年人提供日间服务、过夜护理和家访护理相结合的全包式服务中专业间和专业内合作程度之间的关系
背景 许多国家正在经历快速的人口老龄化,如何为患有疾病或残疾的老年人提供支持,使他们能够继续在社区生活,是一项重大的全球性挑战。日本已将小型集体之家的多功能长期护理和家庭访问护理(MLSH)确立为集医疗和护理服务于一体的服务类别。这些服务侧重于护理功能,为高度依赖医疗护理的老年人提供持续、长期的家庭和临终护理支持。本研究旨在阐明在 MLSH 的背景下,护士对护理益处/挑战的看法与专业间合作程度之间的关系。 方法 我们对日本全国的 MLSH 机构进行了邮寄问卷调查。调查对象包括日本所有运营至少一年的医疗机构。我们分析了 182 份回复(回复率:36.0%;有效回复率:98.3%)。 结果 对代表护士认为的专业间合作程度的得分进行比较后发现,得分最高的是同事护士(3.9 ± 0.5),得分最低的是外部护理经理(2.5 ± 0.9)。与弱合作组相比,强合作组对护理益处的感知更高,而对挑战的感知较低。 结论 本研究结果表明,强合作组能够取得足够的护理效果,同时减少相关的挑战。可能有必要促进与外部专业人员的合作,以妥善处理服务使用者恶化的病情,提高护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General and Family Medicine
Journal of General and Family Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
79
审稿时长
48 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信