Frontal lobe circulation in patients of schizophrenia with and without cannabis dependence: A comparative study

Q4 Psychology
Soumya Ranjan Dash, Amrit Pattojoshi, Amiya Krushna Sahu, Surjeet Sahoo
{"title":"Frontal lobe circulation in patients of schizophrenia with and without cannabis dependence: A comparative study","authors":"Soumya Ranjan Dash, Amrit Pattojoshi, Amiya Krushna Sahu, Surjeet Sahoo","doi":"10.4103/amh.amh_117_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: The symptom profile of schizophrenia is related to the regional cerebral circulations as advocated in various studies. Cannabis dependence in schizophrenia is more common than in the general population. Previous studies comparing the frontal lobe function in schizophrenia with and without comorbid cannabis dependence have shown conflicting results. In this study, we compared the blood flow in the frontal lobes of patients of schizophrenia with and without comorbid cannabis dependence. Aim of the Study: The aim was to compare the blood flow in the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA), in patients of schizophrenia with and without cannabis dependence. Materials and Methodology: This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study. After fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria 28 patients of schizophrenia with cannabis dependence and 28 patients of schizophrenia without cannabis dependence were selected for the study. The blood flow was assessed using Trans-cranial Doppler (TCD) in the ACA and MCA of the left and right sides in both the study groups through the temporal window. Results: A statistically significant difference ( P = 0.049) was found in the pulsatility index of the left ACA where it was lower in schizophrenia patients with cannabis dependence (0.97 ± 0.24) in comparison to schizophrenia patients without co-morbid cannabis dependence (1.11 ± 0.28). However, after using Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons ( P < 0.05/12 i.e., P < 0.004), this comparative statistics too lost its significance. No significant difference was found in the mean flow velocity and resistance index of frontal lobe circulation between the two groups. Conclusion: Chronic cannabis use is having some sparing effect on vascular resistance in the frontal circulation of schizophrenia patients. However, this effect is not significant enough to alter the pattern of frontal circulation.","PeriodicalId":36181,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Mental Health","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/amh.amh_117_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: The symptom profile of schizophrenia is related to the regional cerebral circulations as advocated in various studies. Cannabis dependence in schizophrenia is more common than in the general population. Previous studies comparing the frontal lobe function in schizophrenia with and without comorbid cannabis dependence have shown conflicting results. In this study, we compared the blood flow in the frontal lobes of patients of schizophrenia with and without comorbid cannabis dependence. Aim of the Study: The aim was to compare the blood flow in the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA), in patients of schizophrenia with and without cannabis dependence. Materials and Methodology: This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study. After fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria 28 patients of schizophrenia with cannabis dependence and 28 patients of schizophrenia without cannabis dependence were selected for the study. The blood flow was assessed using Trans-cranial Doppler (TCD) in the ACA and MCA of the left and right sides in both the study groups through the temporal window. Results: A statistically significant difference ( P = 0.049) was found in the pulsatility index of the left ACA where it was lower in schizophrenia patients with cannabis dependence (0.97 ± 0.24) in comparison to schizophrenia patients without co-morbid cannabis dependence (1.11 ± 0.28). However, after using Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons ( P < 0.05/12 i.e., P < 0.004), this comparative statistics too lost its significance. No significant difference was found in the mean flow velocity and resistance index of frontal lobe circulation between the two groups. Conclusion: Chronic cannabis use is having some sparing effect on vascular resistance in the frontal circulation of schizophrenia patients. However, this effect is not significant enough to alter the pattern of frontal circulation.
有和没有大麻依赖的精神分裂症患者额叶循环:一项比较研究
背景:精神分裂症的症状特征与各种研究所提倡的区域脑循环有关。精神分裂症患者的大麻依赖比一般人群更常见。先前的研究比较了精神分裂症患者的额叶功能,有和没有共病的大麻依赖,显示出相互矛盾的结果。在这项研究中,我们比较了精神分裂症患者的额叶血流量有和没有合并症大麻依赖。研究目的:目的是比较有和没有大麻依赖的精神分裂症患者大脑前动脉(ACA)和大脑中动脉(MCA)的血流量。材料和方法:这是一项以医院为基础的横断面研究。在满足纳入和排除标准后,选择28例有大麻依赖的精神分裂症患者和28例无大麻依赖的精神分裂症患者作为研究对象。采用经颅多普勒(transcranial Doppler, TCD)通过颞窗测量两组患者左右侧ACA和MCA的血流量。结果:有大麻依赖的精神分裂症患者左心房搏动指数(0.97±0.24)低于无大麻依赖的精神分裂症患者(1.11±0.28),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.049)。然而,在使用Bonferroni校正进行多次比较(P <0.05/12,即P <0.004),这个比较统计也失去了意义。两组患者额叶循环平均流速和阻力指数无显著差异。结论:慢性大麻使用对精神分裂症患者额叶循环血管阻力有一定的保护作用。然而,这种影响还不足以改变锋面环流的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Mental Health
Archives of Mental Health Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信