Parents’ perspectives on gender and sexuality diversity inclusion in the K-12 curriculum: appropriate or not?

IF 1.4 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Tania Ferfolja, Kate Manlik, Jacqueline Ullman
{"title":"Parents’ perspectives on gender and sexuality diversity inclusion in the K-12 curriculum: appropriate or not?","authors":"Tania Ferfolja, Kate Manlik, Jacqueline Ullman","doi":"10.1080/14681811.2023.2263846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent years have witnessed growing acceptance of gender and sexuality diversity in Australia; yet, its inclusion in the school curriculum remains contentious. Despite evidence to the contrary, there is a commonly held belief that parents consider the inclusion of such topics inappropriate. In the light of this, this paper focuses on an analysis of three qualitative items from an Australian national survey of parents of children attending government-funded schools. Informed by the responses to these questions, we sought to better understand the concept of age-appropriateness present in the discourses deployed by a (minority) number of Australian parents who did not support gender and sexuality diversity-inclusivity in the curriculum. Thematic data analysis identified three key themes used by parents to warrant gender and sexuality diversity curriculum exclusion based on age inappropriateness: namely, inclusion is ‘confusing’; children are too ‘immature’; and children are too ‘easily influenced’.","PeriodicalId":47510,"journal":{"name":"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2023.2263846","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed growing acceptance of gender and sexuality diversity in Australia; yet, its inclusion in the school curriculum remains contentious. Despite evidence to the contrary, there is a commonly held belief that parents consider the inclusion of such topics inappropriate. In the light of this, this paper focuses on an analysis of three qualitative items from an Australian national survey of parents of children attending government-funded schools. Informed by the responses to these questions, we sought to better understand the concept of age-appropriateness present in the discourses deployed by a (minority) number of Australian parents who did not support gender and sexuality diversity-inclusivity in the curriculum. Thematic data analysis identified three key themes used by parents to warrant gender and sexuality diversity curriculum exclusion based on age inappropriateness: namely, inclusion is ‘confusing’; children are too ‘immature’; and children are too ‘easily influenced’.
家长对K-12课程中性别和性取向多样性的看法:合适与否?
近年来,澳大利亚对性别和性取向多样性的接受程度越来越高;然而,将其纳入学校课程仍存在争议。尽管有相反的证据,但人们普遍认为父母认为包含这些话题是不合适的。鉴于此,本文重点分析了澳大利亚对公立学校学生家长的全国性调查中的三个定性项目。通过对这些问题的回答,我们试图更好地理解年龄适宜的概念,这些概念存在于(少数)澳大利亚父母的话语中,他们不支持课程中的性别和性取向多样性包容性。专题数据分析确定了三个关键主题,这些主题被家长用来保证基于年龄不合适的性别和性取向多样性课程的排除:即,包容性是“令人困惑的”;孩子们太“不成熟”;孩子们太“容易受影响”了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信