Effects of direct grain subsidies on food consumption of rural residents in China

IF 2.1 3区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Agribusiness Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1002/agr.21856
Wenyan Xu, Qiran Zhao, Shenggen Fan, Chen Zhu
{"title":"Effects of direct grain subsidies on food consumption of rural residents in China","authors":"Wenyan Xu,&nbsp;Qiran Zhao,&nbsp;Shenggen Fan,&nbsp;Chen Zhu","doi":"10.1002/agr.21856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The agricultural subsidy is an important policy instrument that aims to maintain food security and promote agricultural development in several countries. China introduced its first nationwide agricultural subsidy (i.e., the direct grain subsidy) for farmers in 2004. This study examines the impacts of direct grain subsidies on rural residents' food consumption patterns and nutritional intake on an individual basis. Based on a nationally representative sample of rural households from the National Rural Fixed Observation Points Survey data collected by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China between 2003 and 2015, high-dimensional fixed-effects estimates show that the direct grain subsidy has boosted rural residents' grain consumption but reduced aquatic products, eggs, and dairy consumption in China. Specifically, an increase of 100 Chinese Yuan in per capita subsidies is associated with a rise of 14.94 g in daily grain consumption but a decrease of 0.57, 0.46, and 0.90 g in aquatic products, eggs, and dairy consumption, respectively. Furthermore, direct grain subsidies intensified rural residents' dietary imbalance and declined their dietary diversity. Observed dietary imbalance can be primarily attributed to the subsidy encouraging households' self-sufficient grain consumption, leading to excessive cereal consumption and relatively lower consumption of meat, eggs, and milk. Our findings suggest that direct grain subsidies emphasizing the production of staple grains may inadvertently skew farmers' food consumption and nutritional intake, which may require consideration when evaluating the overall costs and benefits of agricultural subsidy policies. [EconLit Citations: D12, H20, I12, Q18].</p>","PeriodicalId":55544,"journal":{"name":"Agribusiness","volume":"39 S1","pages":"1382-1398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agribusiness","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agr.21856","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The agricultural subsidy is an important policy instrument that aims to maintain food security and promote agricultural development in several countries. China introduced its first nationwide agricultural subsidy (i.e., the direct grain subsidy) for farmers in 2004. This study examines the impacts of direct grain subsidies on rural residents' food consumption patterns and nutritional intake on an individual basis. Based on a nationally representative sample of rural households from the National Rural Fixed Observation Points Survey data collected by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China between 2003 and 2015, high-dimensional fixed-effects estimates show that the direct grain subsidy has boosted rural residents' grain consumption but reduced aquatic products, eggs, and dairy consumption in China. Specifically, an increase of 100 Chinese Yuan in per capita subsidies is associated with a rise of 14.94 g in daily grain consumption but a decrease of 0.57, 0.46, and 0.90 g in aquatic products, eggs, and dairy consumption, respectively. Furthermore, direct grain subsidies intensified rural residents' dietary imbalance and declined their dietary diversity. Observed dietary imbalance can be primarily attributed to the subsidy encouraging households' self-sufficient grain consumption, leading to excessive cereal consumption and relatively lower consumption of meat, eggs, and milk. Our findings suggest that direct grain subsidies emphasizing the production of staple grains may inadvertently skew farmers' food consumption and nutritional intake, which may require consideration when evaluating the overall costs and benefits of agricultural subsidy policies. [EconLit Citations: D12, H20, I12, Q18].

粮食直接补贴对中国农村居民粮食消费的影响
农业补贴是各国维护粮食安全和促进农业发展的重要政策工具。2004年,中国首次在全国范围内为农民提供农业补贴(即粮食直接补贴)。本研究从个体角度考察了粮食直接补贴对农村居民食物消费模式和营养摄入的影响。基于2003 - 2015年中国农业农村部全国农村固定观测点调查数据中具有全国代表性的农户样本,高维固定效应估计表明,粮食直接补贴促进了中国农村居民的粮食消费,但减少了水产品、蛋类和乳制品的消费。具体而言,人均补贴每增加100元,粮食日消费量增加14.94 g,水产品、蛋类和乳制品日消费量分别减少0.57 g、0.46 g和0.90 g。此外,粮食直接补贴加剧了农村居民的膳食失衡,降低了他们的膳食多样性。所观察到的饮食不平衡主要是由于鼓励家庭自给自足的粮食消费补贴,导致谷物消费过多,而肉、蛋、奶的消费相对较低。我们的研究结果表明,强调主粮生产的直接粮食补贴可能会在不经意间扭曲农民的食物消费和营养摄入,这在评估农业补贴政策的总体成本和收益时可能需要考虑。[文献引用:D12, H20, I12, Q18]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agribusiness
Agribusiness 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Agribusiness: An International Journal publishes research that improves our understanding of how food systems work, how they are evolving, and how public and/or private actions affect the performance of the global agro-industrial complex. The journal focuses on the application of economic analysis to the organization and performance of firms and markets in industrial food systems. Subject matter areas include supply and demand analysis, industrial organization analysis, price and trade analysis, marketing, finance, and public policy analysis. International, cross-country comparative, and within-country studies are welcome. To facilitate research the journal’s Forum section, on an intermittent basis, offers commentary and reports on business policy issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信