‘Strengthening [the] family’ through adult education in Turkey: a critical discourse analysis of a family education programme

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ayca G. Kaymakcioglu, H. Ayse Caner, Fatma Gök
{"title":"‘Strengthening [the] family’ through adult education in Turkey: a critical discourse analysis of a family education programme","authors":"Ayca G. Kaymakcioglu, H. Ayse Caner, Fatma Gök","doi":"10.1080/02660830.2023.2257016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis paper discusses the scope of governmental interventions in families through adult education in the context of Turkey’s family-focused debates. The central question is to understand how ‘family’ is constructed in the family life education programme of the Ministry of Family and Social Services. Seven handbooks were chosen from the family education and communication module of the programme. Based on a critical discourse analysis of materials, we examined what textual devices and discursive practices were used to construct ‘family’ and what gendered messages were presented in the texts and visuals of the materials. This study revealed that the selected materials utilised several instruments to normalise the family as a privileged institution in society. In the texts, a heteronormative discourse with an emphasis on reproductivity was reinforced and no attention has been paid to diverse gender identities and family forms. The study also revealed that women were assigned as the primary care providers in the family. In this regard, it is argued that the lack of progressive or critical approaches to the conceptualisation of family limits the understanding of needs and educational practices available for families.Keywords: Adult educationgenderfamily life educationwomenfamily Author contributionThe work reported in this article is based on the first author’s dissertation study, which was completed in 2020. All authors contributed to the drafting and critical revision of the article, and they have approved the final modified version.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The Ministry of Family and Social Services (MoFSS) as of 2021.2 280 femicides and 217 suspicious deaths of women were recorded in 2021. Retrieved from http://kadincinayetlerinidurduracagiz.net3 The Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence. Better known as the ‘Istanbul Convention’ as it was opened for signature in 2011 in Istanbul.","PeriodicalId":42210,"journal":{"name":"Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2023.2257016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThis paper discusses the scope of governmental interventions in families through adult education in the context of Turkey’s family-focused debates. The central question is to understand how ‘family’ is constructed in the family life education programme of the Ministry of Family and Social Services. Seven handbooks were chosen from the family education and communication module of the programme. Based on a critical discourse analysis of materials, we examined what textual devices and discursive practices were used to construct ‘family’ and what gendered messages were presented in the texts and visuals of the materials. This study revealed that the selected materials utilised several instruments to normalise the family as a privileged institution in society. In the texts, a heteronormative discourse with an emphasis on reproductivity was reinforced and no attention has been paid to diverse gender identities and family forms. The study also revealed that women were assigned as the primary care providers in the family. In this regard, it is argued that the lack of progressive or critical approaches to the conceptualisation of family limits the understanding of needs and educational practices available for families.Keywords: Adult educationgenderfamily life educationwomenfamily Author contributionThe work reported in this article is based on the first author’s dissertation study, which was completed in 2020. All authors contributed to the drafting and critical revision of the article, and they have approved the final modified version.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The Ministry of Family and Social Services (MoFSS) as of 2021.2 280 femicides and 217 suspicious deaths of women were recorded in 2021. Retrieved from http://kadincinayetlerinidurduracagiz.net3 The Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence. Better known as the ‘Istanbul Convention’ as it was opened for signature in 2011 in Istanbul.
通过土耳其成人教育“加强家庭”:对家庭教育项目的批判性话语分析
摘要本文讨论了在土耳其以家庭为中心的辩论背景下,通过成人教育对家庭进行政府干预的范围。核心问题是了解在家庭和社会服务部的家庭生活教育方案中“家庭”是如何构成的。从该方案的家庭教育和交流模块中选择了七本手册。基于对材料的批判性话语分析,我们研究了哪些文本设备和话语实践被用来构建“家庭”,以及在材料的文本和视觉中呈现了哪些性别信息。这项研究表明,所选择的材料利用了几种手段使家庭作为社会中的特权机构正常化。在这些文本中,强调生殖能力的异性恋规范话语得到加强,没有注意到不同的性别身份和家庭形式。研究还显示,妇女被指定为家庭的主要保健提供者。在这方面,有人认为,对家庭概念化缺乏进步或批判的方法,限制了对家庭需要和现有教育做法的理解。关键词:成人教育性别家庭生活教育女性家庭作者贡献本文报告的工作是在第一作者于2020年完成的论文研究的基础上完成的。所有作者都参与了文章的起草和重要修改,并批准了最终的修改版本。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1家庭和社会服务部(MoFSS)截至2022年,2021年记录了280起杀害妇女事件和217起可疑妇女死亡事件。摘自http://kadincinayetlerinidurduracagiz.net3欧洲委员会防止和打击暴力侵害妇女行为和家庭暴力公约。更广为人知的名字是“伊斯坦布尔公约”,因为它于2011年在伊斯坦布尔开放供签署。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE
Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信