Christina Ioanna Pappa, Despoina Georgiou, Daniel Pittich
{"title":"Assessing the state of technology education in primary schools: a systematic review of the last 2 decades","authors":"Christina Ioanna Pappa, Despoina Georgiou, Daniel Pittich","doi":"10.1007/s10798-023-09851-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study reports on a systematic review of the current status of technology education in primary schools and the terminology used in the fields of technology and engineering education. Additionally, this review highlights crucial aspects of teaching and learning that must not be overlooked when outlining the current state of technology and engineering education, such as students’ and teachers’ personal factors, classroom communication, and teacher professional growth. Following PRISMA guidelines, two electronic databases were reviewed, Web of Science and Education Resources Information Center. The literature search identified a total of 1206 papers, 125 from Web of Science and 1081 from ERIC. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 33 papers were selected and evaluated in depth. The results show that research on technology education in primary schools is a growing field of interest but fragmented in focus. Our review is the first to indicate the wide range of technology and engineering education definitions. We also highlight the large heterogeneity of studies focusing on students’ and teachers’ personal factors and classroom interactions, a finding that may be explained by the unclear concepts and aims of technology and engineering curricula. This study contributes to and supports research and policymaking to better understand the current status, heterogeneities, and challenges in technology and engineering education in primary schools. In addition, we provide first insights to support professional development efforts targeting teachers’ technology acceptance and improvement of their technology-related teaching practices.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09851-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract This study reports on a systematic review of the current status of technology education in primary schools and the terminology used in the fields of technology and engineering education. Additionally, this review highlights crucial aspects of teaching and learning that must not be overlooked when outlining the current state of technology and engineering education, such as students’ and teachers’ personal factors, classroom communication, and teacher professional growth. Following PRISMA guidelines, two electronic databases were reviewed, Web of Science and Education Resources Information Center. The literature search identified a total of 1206 papers, 125 from Web of Science and 1081 from ERIC. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 33 papers were selected and evaluated in depth. The results show that research on technology education in primary schools is a growing field of interest but fragmented in focus. Our review is the first to indicate the wide range of technology and engineering education definitions. We also highlight the large heterogeneity of studies focusing on students’ and teachers’ personal factors and classroom interactions, a finding that may be explained by the unclear concepts and aims of technology and engineering curricula. This study contributes to and supports research and policymaking to better understand the current status, heterogeneities, and challenges in technology and engineering education in primary schools. In addition, we provide first insights to support professional development efforts targeting teachers’ technology acceptance and improvement of their technology-related teaching practices.
摘要本研究系统回顾了小学技术教育的现状以及技术和工程教育领域使用的术语。此外,本综述强调了在概述技术和工程教育现状时不可忽视的教学和学习的关键方面,如学生和教师的个人因素、课堂交流和教师的专业成长。按照PRISMA的指导方针,审查了两个电子数据库,科学和教育资源信息中心网。文献检索共发现1206篇论文,其中125篇来自Web of Science, 1081篇来自ERIC。应用纳入和排除标准,选择33篇论文进行深度评价。结果表明,对小学技术教育的研究是一个越来越感兴趣的领域,但焦点分散。我们的评论是第一个指出广泛的技术和工程教育的定义。我们还强调了关注学生和教师的个人因素和课堂互动的研究的巨大异质性,这一发现可以用技术和工程课程的概念和目标不明确来解释。本研究有助于研究和政策制定,以更好地了解小学技术与工程教育的现状、异质性和挑战。此外,我们还提供了第一手的见解,以支持针对教师技术接受度和技术相关教学实践改进的专业发展努力。