Validity and Practicality of Geogebra Application-Based Mathematics Learning Tools to Train Visual-Spatial Intelligence

Rezkiyana Hikmah
{"title":"Validity and Practicality of Geogebra Application-Based Mathematics Learning Tools to Train Visual-Spatial Intelligence","authors":"Rezkiyana Hikmah","doi":"10.32939/jdime.v1i1.2336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An effective distance learning tool must be able to train students' spatial intelligence to help them develop visualization skills. Thus, this study aims to see the validity and practicality of GeoGebra application-based distance learning tools. This development research (R&D) uses a three-phase development approach based on Plomp Theory, which is divided into three stages: preliminary research, prototyping, and assessment. Validation and practicality questionnaires were used to obtain research data and analyzed with descriptive qualitative statistics. The results of the data analysis showed that the mathematics learning tools were evaluated with the \"Very Valid\" category. This is based on the assessment of three validators where the total average value of the validity of the lesson plan is 4.28 which is included in the \"very valid\" category, while the total average value of the validity of the LKPD is 4.24 which is also included in the category. In addition, the LKPD and lesson plans developed were also considered \"practical\". This is based on the assessment of three validators who produced an average final value of the RPP's practicality of 85, which is included in the \"A\" category, which means that the RPP that serves as a learning device can be used without modification, and the overall average value of the LKPD's practicality is 84.57, which puts it in the \"B\" category, which indicates that the LKPD can be used as a learning device with minor modifications. This means that Geogebra-based learning tools are reliable tools to assist teachers in developing learners' mathematical and spatial visualization skills.","PeriodicalId":495834,"journal":{"name":"JDIME Journal of Development and Innovation in Mathematics Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDIME Journal of Development and Innovation in Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32939/jdime.v1i1.2336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An effective distance learning tool must be able to train students' spatial intelligence to help them develop visualization skills. Thus, this study aims to see the validity and practicality of GeoGebra application-based distance learning tools. This development research (R&D) uses a three-phase development approach based on Plomp Theory, which is divided into three stages: preliminary research, prototyping, and assessment. Validation and practicality questionnaires were used to obtain research data and analyzed with descriptive qualitative statistics. The results of the data analysis showed that the mathematics learning tools were evaluated with the "Very Valid" category. This is based on the assessment of three validators where the total average value of the validity of the lesson plan is 4.28 which is included in the "very valid" category, while the total average value of the validity of the LKPD is 4.24 which is also included in the category. In addition, the LKPD and lesson plans developed were also considered "practical". This is based on the assessment of three validators who produced an average final value of the RPP's practicality of 85, which is included in the "A" category, which means that the RPP that serves as a learning device can be used without modification, and the overall average value of the LKPD's practicality is 84.57, which puts it in the "B" category, which indicates that the LKPD can be used as a learning device with minor modifications. This means that Geogebra-based learning tools are reliable tools to assist teachers in developing learners' mathematical and spatial visualization skills.
基于地学应用的数学学习工具训练视觉空间智能的有效性与实用性
一个有效的远程学习工具必须能够训练学生的空间智能,帮助他们发展可视化技能。因此,本研究旨在验证基于GeoGebra应用的远程学习工具的有效性和实用性。这种开发研究(R&D)使用基于Plomp理论的三阶段开发方法,分为三个阶段:初步研究、原型设计和评估。采用验证性问卷和实用性问卷获取研究数据,并采用描述性定性统计进行分析。数据分析结果显示,数学学习工具被评为“非常有效”类别。这是基于三个验证者的评估,其中教案的效度的总平均值为4.28,属于“非常有效”类别,而LKPD的效度的总平均值为4.24,也属于“非常有效”类别。此外,LKPD和课程计划的制定也被认为是“实用的”。这是根据三位验证者的评估得出的RPP实用性的平均最终值为85,属于“A”类,这意味着RPP可以作为学习装置使用,而LKPD的实用性的总体平均值为84.57,属于“B”类,这表明LKPD可以作为学习装置使用,只需进行少量修改。这意味着基于geogebra的学习工具是帮助教师发展学习者的数学和空间可视化技能的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书