Evaluating the effectiveness of isolated fungi against Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda)

Abera Hailu DEGAGA, Emana Getu DEGAGA
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness of isolated fungi against Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda)","authors":"Abera Hailu DEGAGA, Emana Getu DEGAGA","doi":"10.54203/jlsb.2023.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spodoptera frugiperda, also known as the fall armyworm (FAW), is a polyphagous, destructive, and internationally dispersed insect pest that poses a serious danger to the production of cereals in Africa. Entomopathogens are a safe and environmentally beneficial way to control insect infestations when the all types of insecticides being used to control FAW are linked to a range of serious human health problems from respiratory to cancer. The objective of this study was to identify fungi from local soil that were effective against S. frugiperda larvae. Aluminum foil was used to gather soil samples from various maize growing regions in Ethiopia. Fungi isolated from soil samples and suspended conidia preparation was done in the mycology lab of Addis Ababa University in Ethiopia. At Melkasa Agricultural Research Center a bioassay test was conducted on S. frugiperda larvae. Three replications and a fully randomized design was used to set up the six treatments for the experiment. Twenty FAW larvae (3rd instar) were put into sterile Petri dishes with a diameter of 9 cm and a filter paper lining. A new, unopened syringe was used to inject 3 ml of the suspended solution into each treatment. As a negative control, distilled and sterilized water was used. FAW larval mortality was measured and examined independently for each treatment using GLM, followed by a Tukey's HSD post-hoc test. The cumulative mortality rate (P = 0.0001) and second-day mortality rate (P = 0.001) showed a significant difference between regimens. These noteworthy variations were seen in third instar larvae. S. frugiperda larvae from isolation fungi F1 and F5 had the highest (96.67%) and lowest (80.0%) mean cumulative death rates. Under negative control, the mean cumulative mortality rate was 8.33%. The outcomes showed that S. frugiperda could potentially be controlled by fungal isolates found in maize fields. Conidial concentration, as well as field evaluation, characterisation, and species identification of isolate fungi, all require more study.","PeriodicalId":473219,"journal":{"name":"Journal of life sciences and biomedicine","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of life sciences and biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54203/jlsb.2023.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spodoptera frugiperda, also known as the fall armyworm (FAW), is a polyphagous, destructive, and internationally dispersed insect pest that poses a serious danger to the production of cereals in Africa. Entomopathogens are a safe and environmentally beneficial way to control insect infestations when the all types of insecticides being used to control FAW are linked to a range of serious human health problems from respiratory to cancer. The objective of this study was to identify fungi from local soil that were effective against S. frugiperda larvae. Aluminum foil was used to gather soil samples from various maize growing regions in Ethiopia. Fungi isolated from soil samples and suspended conidia preparation was done in the mycology lab of Addis Ababa University in Ethiopia. At Melkasa Agricultural Research Center a bioassay test was conducted on S. frugiperda larvae. Three replications and a fully randomized design was used to set up the six treatments for the experiment. Twenty FAW larvae (3rd instar) were put into sterile Petri dishes with a diameter of 9 cm and a filter paper lining. A new, unopened syringe was used to inject 3 ml of the suspended solution into each treatment. As a negative control, distilled and sterilized water was used. FAW larval mortality was measured and examined independently for each treatment using GLM, followed by a Tukey's HSD post-hoc test. The cumulative mortality rate (P = 0.0001) and second-day mortality rate (P = 0.001) showed a significant difference between regimens. These noteworthy variations were seen in third instar larvae. S. frugiperda larvae from isolation fungi F1 and F5 had the highest (96.67%) and lowest (80.0%) mean cumulative death rates. Under negative control, the mean cumulative mortality rate was 8.33%. The outcomes showed that S. frugiperda could potentially be controlled by fungal isolates found in maize fields. Conidial concentration, as well as field evaluation, characterisation, and species identification of isolate fungi, all require more study.
分离真菌防治秋粘虫效果评价
Spodoptera frugiperda,也被称为秋粘虫(FAW),是一种多食性、破坏性和遍布国际的害虫,对非洲的谷物生产构成严重威胁。当用于控制FAW的所有类型的杀虫剂都与从呼吸系统到癌症的一系列严重人类健康问题有关时,昆虫病原体是一种安全且对环境有益的控制昆虫侵扰的方法。本研究的目的是从当地土壤中鉴定出对frugiperda幼虫有效的真菌。铝箔被用来收集埃塞俄比亚不同玉米种植区的土壤样本。在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴大学真菌学实验室从土壤样品中分离真菌并制备悬浮分生孢子。在Melkasa农业研究中心,对frugiperda幼虫进行了生物测定试验。试验采用3个重复和全随机设计设置6个处理。将20只3龄FAW幼虫放入直径为9 cm、内衬滤纸的无菌培养皿中。一个新的,未打开的注射器注射3毫升的悬浮液到每个治疗。阴性对照采用蒸馏水和灭菌水。使用GLM分别测量和检查FAW幼虫死亡率,然后进行Tukey's HSD事后测试。累积死亡率(P = 0.0001)和第二天死亡率(P = 0.001)在不同治疗方案之间存在显著差异。这些值得注意的变化在三龄幼虫中可见。分离真菌F1和F5的平均累积死亡率最高(96.67%),最低(80.0%)。阴性对照的平均累积死亡率为8.33%。结果表明,玉米田真菌分离株具有潜在的防治效果。分生孢子的浓度,以及分离真菌的实地评价、表征和物种鉴定,都需要更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信