POSSIBLE EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF VOLCANOGENIC MAGMATISM IN THE SINYAYA RIVER BASIN AT THE SOUTHERN FLANK OF THE VILYUI SYNECLISE

V. V. Baranov, V. S. Grinenko, V. P. Afanasiev, S. S. Ugapieva, N. P. Pokhilenko, N. V. Popov, N. V. Zayakina, T.  I. Vasilieva
{"title":"POSSIBLE EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF VOLCANOGENIC MAGMATISM IN THE SINYAYA RIVER BASIN AT THE SOUTHERN FLANK OF THE VILYUI SYNECLISE","authors":"V. V. Baranov, V. S. Grinenko, V. P. Afanasiev, S. S. Ugapieva, N. P. Pokhilenko, N. V. Popov, N. V. Zayakina, T.  I. Vasilieva","doi":"10.5800/gt-2023-14-5-0719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of different-extension geological survey, exploration and thematic work methods show that the Vilyui syneclise is relatively amagmatic. However, the recent factual evidence in this region indicates the occurrence of magmatism of a different composition and age. This evidence includes kimberlite indicator mineral found in the sedimentary cover of the syneclise. Kimberlites or magmatic rocks of a different composition are not yet known there, so that any other signs of the presence of this type of rocks therein are of importance. As such a sign the authors consider a boulder of metamorphic rock found in the Archean greenstone succession in the lower reaches of the Sinyaya River at the southeastern flank of the Vilyui syneclise. The rock is similar in its mineral composition to garnet-staurolite-kyanite schist typical of the Barrovian metamorphic rocks series. The rocks of this mineral composition are common in the greenstone belts of the Aldan-Stanovoy Shield. In particular, they are typical of the Tungurchin metapelite unit of the TemulyakitTungurchin greenstone belt exposed in the western part of the shield. The straight line distance between the sratotype area of the Tungurchin Formation development and the place where the boulder was found is more than 600 km southwest of the Sinyaya River. So it is unlikely that the boulder was just transported along the Lena River basin and then to the Sinyaya River by, for example, the Quaternary glacial ice. A more realistic way the boulder appeared in the place where it was found would be its transportation from depth by volcanic pipe, i.e. the boulder is a xenolith from volcanic pipe. The volcanic pipe can be within a radius of a few tens of kilometers or less. The Archean basement therein lies at at a depth of a few hundreds of meters to 100 meters which implies transportation of so large xenolith to the surface during the volcanic pipe formation. Therefore, it can be implied that magmatic events occurred in the form of the Jurassic-Cretaceous or probably Middle Paleozoic volcanic pipe intrusion into the Sinyaya River basin area where the metamorphic xenolith was found.","PeriodicalId":203555,"journal":{"name":"Geodinamika i Tektonofizika","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodinamika i Tektonofizika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5800/gt-2023-14-5-0719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The results of different-extension geological survey, exploration and thematic work methods show that the Vilyui syneclise is relatively amagmatic. However, the recent factual evidence in this region indicates the occurrence of magmatism of a different composition and age. This evidence includes kimberlite indicator mineral found in the sedimentary cover of the syneclise. Kimberlites or magmatic rocks of a different composition are not yet known there, so that any other signs of the presence of this type of rocks therein are of importance. As such a sign the authors consider a boulder of metamorphic rock found in the Archean greenstone succession in the lower reaches of the Sinyaya River at the southeastern flank of the Vilyui syneclise. The rock is similar in its mineral composition to garnet-staurolite-kyanite schist typical of the Barrovian metamorphic rocks series. The rocks of this mineral composition are common in the greenstone belts of the Aldan-Stanovoy Shield. In particular, they are typical of the Tungurchin metapelite unit of the TemulyakitTungurchin greenstone belt exposed in the western part of the shield. The straight line distance between the sratotype area of the Tungurchin Formation development and the place where the boulder was found is more than 600 km southwest of the Sinyaya River. So it is unlikely that the boulder was just transported along the Lena River basin and then to the Sinyaya River by, for example, the Quaternary glacial ice. A more realistic way the boulder appeared in the place where it was found would be its transportation from depth by volcanic pipe, i.e. the boulder is a xenolith from volcanic pipe. The volcanic pipe can be within a radius of a few tens of kilometers or less. The Archean basement therein lies at at a depth of a few hundreds of meters to 100 meters which implies transportation of so large xenolith to the surface during the volcanic pipe formation. Therefore, it can be implied that magmatic events occurred in the form of the Jurassic-Cretaceous or probably Middle Paleozoic volcanic pipe intrusion into the Sinyaya River basin area where the metamorphic xenolith was found.
在维留伊合成带南侧的辛雅雅河流域可能存在火山岩浆活动的证据
不同伸展期地质调查、勘探和专题工作方法的结果表明,维柳合带岩浆相对丰富。然而,最近的事实证据表明,该地区岩浆活动的组成和年龄不同。这一证据包括在合缝岩的沉积盖层中发现的金伯利岩指示矿物。金伯利岩或不同成分的岩浆岩在那里还不为人所知,因此任何表明这类岩石存在的其他迹象都是重要的。作为这样的一个标志,作者考虑了在维柳合成体东南侧辛雅雅河下游太古宙绿岩演替中发现的一块变质岩巨石。岩石的矿物组成类似于典型的巴罗维亚变质岩系列的石榴石-小晶石-蓝晶石片岩。这种矿物组成的岩石在Aldan-Stanovoy盾的绿岩带中很常见。特别是在盾体西部暴露的铁木拉基特-通古尔沁绿岩带的通古尔沁变质岩单元中,它们是典型的。Tungurchin组发育的平顶型区域与发现巨石的地方之间的直线距离在Sinyaya河西南600多公里处。因此,这块巨石不太可能只是沿着勒拿河流域,然后被第四纪冰川冰运送到辛雅雅河。一种更现实的方式是,巨石出现在它被发现的地方,它是由火山管道从深处运输过来的,也就是说,巨石是来自火山管道的捕虏体。火山管可以在半径几十公里或更小的范围内。其中的太古宙基底位于几百米至100米的深度,这意味着在火山管形成过程中,如此大的捕虏体被运输到地表。由此可以推断,在发现变质捕虏体的辛雅雅河流域地区,岩浆事件可能以侏罗纪-白垩纪或中古生代火山管侵入的形式发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信