{"title":"Gledaj (TV) i uči? Važnost (utjelovljenog) kulturnog kapitala u objašnjenju klasične i digitalne medijske pismenosti","authors":"Krešimir Krolo","doi":"10.5613/rzs.53.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to identify whether dimensions of cultural capital affect traditional and media literacy by using survey data collected in 2022 as part of the project Medijsko obrazovanje je važno (N=1033). Using Bourdieu's theoretical framework, three dimensions of cultural capital were operationalised as independent variables: objectified (number of books in the household), embodied (taste in TV programmes), and institutionalised (level of education) cultural capital. Traditional media literacy was operationalised as critical reading of media messages, while digital media literacy was operationalised as creating online digital content. Both of these variables were used as dependent variables in the analysis. Following principal component analysis (PCA), hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to establish whether cultural capital has explanatory power for both dimensions of media literacy. The results point to the statistically significant role of objectified cultural capital in explaining traditional media literacy, although that explanation’s statistical power remains questionable. Digital media literacy exhibited no statistically significant connection with all three cultural capital dimensions. However, additional analysis points to the relevance of digital skills as a more potent factor in explaining traditional and digital media literacy. Overall, digital capital represents a more relevant distinction factor than users’ classic cultural capital in a contemporary media environment. The implications of this data point to the conclusion that media literacy is primarily shaped through various forms of digital capital, although the role of television should not be neglected when developing future programmes in media literacy.","PeriodicalId":39535,"journal":{"name":"Revija za Sociologiju","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revija za Sociologiju","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.53.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper aims to identify whether dimensions of cultural capital affect traditional and media literacy by using survey data collected in 2022 as part of the project Medijsko obrazovanje je važno (N=1033). Using Bourdieu's theoretical framework, three dimensions of cultural capital were operationalised as independent variables: objectified (number of books in the household), embodied (taste in TV programmes), and institutionalised (level of education) cultural capital. Traditional media literacy was operationalised as critical reading of media messages, while digital media literacy was operationalised as creating online digital content. Both of these variables were used as dependent variables in the analysis. Following principal component analysis (PCA), hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to establish whether cultural capital has explanatory power for both dimensions of media literacy. The results point to the statistically significant role of objectified cultural capital in explaining traditional media literacy, although that explanation’s statistical power remains questionable. Digital media literacy exhibited no statistically significant connection with all three cultural capital dimensions. However, additional analysis points to the relevance of digital skills as a more potent factor in explaining traditional and digital media literacy. Overall, digital capital represents a more relevant distinction factor than users’ classic cultural capital in a contemporary media environment. The implications of this data point to the conclusion that media literacy is primarily shaped through various forms of digital capital, although the role of television should not be neglected when developing future programmes in media literacy.
本文旨在通过使用作为Medijsko obrazovanje važno项目一部分的2022年收集的调查数据(N=1033),确定文化资本的维度是否影响传统和媒体素养。利用布迪厄的理论框架,文化资本的三个维度作为独立变量进行操作:客观化(家庭中的书籍数量),具体化(电视节目品味)和制度化(教育水平)文化资本。传统媒体素养被操作为对媒体信息的批判性阅读,而数字媒体素养被操作为创建在线数字内容。这两个变量在分析中被用作因变量。在主成分分析(PCA)的基础上,进行层次回归分析,以确定文化资本是否对媒介素养的两个维度都具有解释力。结果指出,客体化文化资本在解释传统媒体素养方面的统计意义显著,尽管这种解释的统计能力仍然值得怀疑。数字媒体素养与所有三个文化资本维度没有统计学上的显著联系。然而,额外的分析指出,数字技能的相关性是解释传统和数字媒体素养的一个更有力的因素。总体而言,在当代媒体环境中,数字资本比用户的经典文化资本代表了一个更相关的区分因素。这一数据的含义表明,媒体素养主要是通过各种形式的数字资本形成的,尽管在制定未来的媒体素养方案时不应忽视电视的作用。