Foundational Competencies in Educational Measurement

IF 2.7 4区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1111/emip.12581

Terry A. Ackerman, Deborah L. Bandalos, Derek C. Briggs, Howard T. Everson, Andrew D. Ho, Susan M. Lottridge, Matthew J. Madison, Sandip Sinharay, Michael C. Rodriguez, Michael Russell, Alina A. von Davier, Stefanie A. Wind

{"title":"Foundational Competencies in Educational Measurement","authors":"Terry A. Ackerman, Deborah L. Bandalos, Derek C. Briggs, Howard T. Everson, Andrew D. Ho, Susan M. Lottridge, Matthew J. Madison, Sandip Sinharay, Michael C. Rodriguez, Michael Russell, Alina A. von Davier, Stefanie A. Wind","doi":"10.1111/emip.12581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article presents the consensus of an National Council on Measurement in Education Presidential Task Force on Foundational Competencies in Educational Measurement. Foundational competencies are those that support future development of additional professional and disciplinary competencies. The authors develop a framework for foundational competencies in educational measurement, illustrate how educational measurement programs can help learners develop these competencies, and demonstrate how foundational competencies continue to develop in educational measurement professions. The framework introduces three foundational competency domains: Communication and Collaboration Competencies; Technical, Statistical, and Computational Competencies; and Educational Measurement Competencies. Within the Educational Measurement Competency domain, the authors identify five subdomains: Social, Cultural, Historical, and Political Context; Validity, Validation, and Fairness; Theory and Instrumentation; Precision and Generalization; and Psychometric Modeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":47345,"journal":{"name":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12581","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents the consensus of an National Council on Measurement in Education Presidential Task Force on Foundational Competencies in Educational Measurement. Foundational competencies are those that support future development of additional professional and disciplinary competencies. The authors develop a framework for foundational competencies in educational measurement, illustrate how educational measurement programs can help learners develop these competencies, and demonstrate how foundational competencies continue to develop in educational measurement professions. The framework introduces three foundational competency domains: Communication and Collaboration Competencies; Technical, Statistical, and Computational Competencies; and Educational Measurement Competencies. Within the Educational Measurement Competency domain, the authors identify five subdomains: Social, Cultural, Historical, and Political Context; Validity, Validation, and Fairness; Theory and Instrumentation; Precision and Generalization; and Psychometric Modeling.

查看原文本刊更多论文

教育测量的基本能力

本文介绍了美国国家教育测量委员会（National Council on Measurement in Education Presidential Task Force on Foundational Competencies in Educational Measurement）的共识。基础能力是指支持未来发展其他专业和学科能力的能力。作者制定了教育测量基础能力框架，说明了教育测量课程如何帮助学习者发展这些能力，并展示了基础能力如何在教育测量专业中不断发展。该框架介绍了三个基础能力领域：沟通与协作能力；技术、统计与计算能力；教育测量能力。在教育测量能力领域中，作者确定了五个子领域：社会、文化、历史和政治背景；有效性、验证和公平性；理论和工具；精确性和概括性；以及心理测量模型。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice Multiple-

CiteScore

3.90

自引率

15.00%

发文量