{"title":"Recovery process for sports-related concussion assessed with precise ocular motility","authors":"Hidetaka Onodera, Takuma Takuma, Kanaka Yatabe, Hiroto Fujiya, Hidetoshi Murata","doi":"10.1055/a-2183-1077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ocular motility has been linked to Sports Concussion Assessment Tool 5 scores. However, the link between ocular motility changes and assessment result changes remains unclear. Hence, we investigated that potential link in patients with sports-related concussions. We retrospectively included participants aged ≥18 years who were diagnosed with a sports-related concussion. They underwent smooth pursuit eye movement assessment for allocation to good improvement group (rate of fundamental frequency ≥15%) or minor improvement (<15%) groups. Sports Concussion Assessment Tool 5 scores were determined at baseline and two weeks later, and score changes were compared between the groups. Thirteen men (mean±standard deviation age: 20.6±5.0 years) were included: eight (19.0±4.5 years) in the good improvement group and five (20.6±5.7 years) in the minor improvement group. Symptom number (median=2.0 vs. 0.0), symptom severity (median=22.0 vs. 3.0), single-leg stance (median=4.0 vs. 0.5), tandem stance (median=1.0 vs. 0.0), and total errors (median=5.0 vs. 0.5) were worse (all p<0.05) in the minor improvement group. Smooth pursuit eye movement improvements measured using eye-tracking technology was linked to symptom recovery in patients with sports-related concussions. Therefore, ocular motility may be an objective indicator of sports-related concussions. Future studies with more patients are needed to confirm these findings.","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2183-1077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ocular motility has been linked to Sports Concussion Assessment Tool 5 scores. However, the link between ocular motility changes and assessment result changes remains unclear. Hence, we investigated that potential link in patients with sports-related concussions. We retrospectively included participants aged ≥18 years who were diagnosed with a sports-related concussion. They underwent smooth pursuit eye movement assessment for allocation to good improvement group (rate of fundamental frequency ≥15%) or minor improvement (<15%) groups. Sports Concussion Assessment Tool 5 scores were determined at baseline and two weeks later, and score changes were compared between the groups. Thirteen men (mean±standard deviation age: 20.6±5.0 years) were included: eight (19.0±4.5 years) in the good improvement group and five (20.6±5.7 years) in the minor improvement group. Symptom number (median=2.0 vs. 0.0), symptom severity (median=22.0 vs. 3.0), single-leg stance (median=4.0 vs. 0.5), tandem stance (median=1.0 vs. 0.0), and total errors (median=5.0 vs. 0.5) were worse (all p<0.05) in the minor improvement group. Smooth pursuit eye movement improvements measured using eye-tracking technology was linked to symptom recovery in patients with sports-related concussions. Therefore, ocular motility may be an objective indicator of sports-related concussions. Future studies with more patients are needed to confirm these findings.
本篇脑震荡与体育评估工具5的分数。然而,眼动变化与评估结果变化之间的联系尚不清楚。因此,我们调查了运动相关脑震荡患者的潜在联系。我们回顾性包括参与者年龄≥18年他被诊断出患有与体育运动有关的脑震荡。对患者进行平滑追踪眼动评估,并将其分为良好改善组(基频率≥15%)和轻微改善组(<15%)。在基线和两周后确定运动脑震荡评估工具5评分,并比较各组之间的评分变化。纳入13例男性(平均±标准差年龄:20.6±5.0岁):良好改善组8例(19.0±4.5岁),轻度改善组5例(20.6±5.7岁)。轻度改善组的症状数(中位数=2.0 vs. 0.0)、症状严重程度(中位数=22.0 vs. 3.0)、单腿站立(中位数=4.0 vs. 0.5)、双人站立(中位数=1.0 vs. 0.0)和总误差(中位数=5.0 vs. 0.5)更差(均为0.05)。使用眼球追踪技术测量的眼球运动改善与运动相关脑震荡患者的症状恢复有关。因此,眼动可能是运动相关脑震荡的客观指标。需要更多患者的未来研究来证实这些发现。