‘Sometimes unfair is fair’: New Zealand HPE teachers’ perceptions of social justice

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Rod Philpot
{"title":"‘Sometimes unfair is fair’: New Zealand HPE teachers’ perceptions of social justice","authors":"Rod Philpot","doi":"10.1080/25742981.2023.2270464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper draws on an analytical framework inspired by Nancy Fraser's (2010) three-dimensional theory of social justice to explore how HPE teachers in Aotearoa/New Zealand perceive the concept of social justice and teaching for and about social justice. Data were gathered from online semi-structured interviews with 19 HPE teachers. Analysis involved a six-step process of inductive thematic analysis [Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3]. The results show that participants perceive that social justice is a concept that is important, but it is complex and understood in different ways. A quest for equity, fairness, or inclusion were the most common understandings. The participants identifying how they take action for social justice through pedagogies for social justice that reflect a focus on representation of student voices, recognition of differences, and redistribution of the resources. The findings suggest that affirmative actions within long standing social structures are more prevalent than more transformative pedagogies that challenge underlying beliefs and values.","PeriodicalId":36887,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2023.2270464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper draws on an analytical framework inspired by Nancy Fraser's (2010) three-dimensional theory of social justice to explore how HPE teachers in Aotearoa/New Zealand perceive the concept of social justice and teaching for and about social justice. Data were gathered from online semi-structured interviews with 19 HPE teachers. Analysis involved a six-step process of inductive thematic analysis [Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3]. The results show that participants perceive that social justice is a concept that is important, but it is complex and understood in different ways. A quest for equity, fairness, or inclusion were the most common understandings. The participants identifying how they take action for social justice through pedagogies for social justice that reflect a focus on representation of student voices, recognition of differences, and redistribution of the resources. The findings suggest that affirmative actions within long standing social structures are more prevalent than more transformative pedagogies that challenge underlying beliefs and values.
“有时候不公平就是公平”:新西兰高中教师对社会公正的看法
本文借鉴Nancy Fraser(2010)的社会正义三维理论的分析框架,探讨新西兰奥特罗阿的HPE教师如何看待社会正义的概念以及为社会正义而教学和关于社会正义的教学。数据收集自19名HPE教师的在线半结构化访谈。分析涉及归纳主题分析的六步过程[Braun, V., & Clarke, V.(2022)]。主题分析的概念和设计思维。质的心理,9(1),3。结果表明,参与者认为社会正义是一个重要的概念,但它是复杂的,并以不同的方式理解。对公平、公平或包容的追求是最普遍的理解。参与者确定他们如何通过社会正义教学法为社会正义采取行动,这些教学法反映了对学生声音的代表、对差异的认识和资源的再分配的关注。研究结果表明,在长期存在的社会结构中,平权行动比挑战潜在信仰和价值观的更具变革性的教学法更普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信