Julian Küsel, Florence Martin, Silvija Markic, Erik Jon Byker, Drew Polly
{"title":"Investigating U.S. and German pre-service teachers’ beliefs regarding digital technology","authors":"Julian Küsel, Florence Martin, Silvija Markic, Erik Jon Byker, Drew Polly","doi":"10.1080/03057925.2023.2268518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBased on different educational policies around the world, pre-service teachers are expected to use digital technology in their future teaching in school. However, to do this successfully, they need knowledge, skills and appropriate beliefs regarding utilising digital technology in learning scenarios. Thus, this study explores pre-service teachers’ beliefs regarding current digital technologies in their learning and future teaching. 232 pre-service teachers from Germany and the US participated in the comparative study and responded to the Digital Technologies Survey. The results show that overall pre-service teachers’ beliefs regarding digital technology in learning and teaching are on a moderate level. However, significant differences were seen between pre-service teachers from Germany and the US. For US pre-service teachers, digital technology seems more important and helpful for their current learning and future teaching than for German pre-service teachers. The same can be seen for self-assessed competence. The results and further implications are discussed.KEYWORDS: Beliefsdigitisation of educationICT enhanced teaching and learninghigher educationtechnology in education and training Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":47586,"journal":{"name":"Compare-A Journal of Comparative and International Education","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compare-A Journal of Comparative and International Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2023.2268518","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTBased on different educational policies around the world, pre-service teachers are expected to use digital technology in their future teaching in school. However, to do this successfully, they need knowledge, skills and appropriate beliefs regarding utilising digital technology in learning scenarios. Thus, this study explores pre-service teachers’ beliefs regarding current digital technologies in their learning and future teaching. 232 pre-service teachers from Germany and the US participated in the comparative study and responded to the Digital Technologies Survey. The results show that overall pre-service teachers’ beliefs regarding digital technology in learning and teaching are on a moderate level. However, significant differences were seen between pre-service teachers from Germany and the US. For US pre-service teachers, digital technology seems more important and helpful for their current learning and future teaching than for German pre-service teachers. The same can be seen for self-assessed competence. The results and further implications are discussed.KEYWORDS: Beliefsdigitisation of educationICT enhanced teaching and learninghigher educationtechnology in education and training Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
期刊介绍:
Comparative and international studies in education enjoy new popularity. They illuminate the effects of globalisation and post-structural thinking on learning for professional and personal lives. Compare publishes such research as it relates to educational development and change in different parts of the world. It seeks analyses of educational discourse, policy and practice across disciplines, and their implications for teaching, learning and management. The editors welcome papers which reflect on practice from early childhood to the end of adult life, review processes of comparative and international enquiry and report on empirical studies. All papers should include a comparative dimension.