AI's empathy gap: The risks of conversational Artificial Intelligence for young children's well-being and key ethical considerations for early childhood education and care

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nomisha Kurian
{"title":"AI's empathy gap: The risks of conversational Artificial Intelligence for young children's well-being and key ethical considerations for early childhood education and care","authors":"Nomisha Kurian","doi":"10.1177/14639491231206004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rapid technological advancements make it easier than ever for young children to ‘talk to’ artificial intelligence (AI). Conversational AI models spanning education and entertainment include those specifically designed for early childhood education and care, as well as those not designed for young children but easily accessible by them. It is therefore crucial to critically analyse the ethical implications for children's well-being when a conversation with AI is just a click away. This colloquium flags the ‘empathy gap’ that characterises AI systems that are designed to mimic empathy, explaining the risks of erratic or inadequate responses for child well-being. It discusses key social and technical concerns, tracing how conversational AI may be unable to adequately respond to young children's emotional needs and the limits of natural language processing due to AI's operation within predefined contexts determined by training data. While proficient at recognising patterns and data associations, conversational AI can falter when confronted with unconventional speech patterns, imaginative scenarios or the playful, non-literal language that is typical of children's communication. In addition, societal prejudices can infiltrate AI training data or influence the output of conversational AI, potentially undermining young children's rights to safe, non-discriminatory environments. This colloquium therefore underscores the ethical imperative of safeguarding children and responsible child-centred design. It offers a set of practical considerations for policies, practices and critical ethical reflection on conversational AI for the field of early childhood education and care, emphasising the need for transparent communication, continual evaluation and robust guard rails to prioritise children's well-being.","PeriodicalId":46773,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14639491231206004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid technological advancements make it easier than ever for young children to ‘talk to’ artificial intelligence (AI). Conversational AI models spanning education and entertainment include those specifically designed for early childhood education and care, as well as those not designed for young children but easily accessible by them. It is therefore crucial to critically analyse the ethical implications for children's well-being when a conversation with AI is just a click away. This colloquium flags the ‘empathy gap’ that characterises AI systems that are designed to mimic empathy, explaining the risks of erratic or inadequate responses for child well-being. It discusses key social and technical concerns, tracing how conversational AI may be unable to adequately respond to young children's emotional needs and the limits of natural language processing due to AI's operation within predefined contexts determined by training data. While proficient at recognising patterns and data associations, conversational AI can falter when confronted with unconventional speech patterns, imaginative scenarios or the playful, non-literal language that is typical of children's communication. In addition, societal prejudices can infiltrate AI training data or influence the output of conversational AI, potentially undermining young children's rights to safe, non-discriminatory environments. This colloquium therefore underscores the ethical imperative of safeguarding children and responsible child-centred design. It offers a set of practical considerations for policies, practices and critical ethical reflection on conversational AI for the field of early childhood education and care, emphasising the need for transparent communication, continual evaluation and robust guard rails to prioritise children's well-being.
人工智能的同理心差距:对话式人工智能对幼儿福祉的风险,以及幼儿教育和护理的关键伦理考虑
快速的技术进步使得幼儿比以往任何时候都更容易与人工智能(AI)“交谈”。跨越教育和娱乐的会话式人工智能模型包括那些专门为幼儿教育和护理设计的模型,以及那些不是为幼儿设计但他们容易使用的模型。因此,当与人工智能对话只需点击一下鼠标时,批判性地分析对儿童福祉的伦理影响至关重要。本次研讨会指出了“同理心差距”,这是旨在模仿同理心的人工智能系统的特征,解释了不稳定或不充分的回应对儿童福祉的风险。它讨论了关键的社会和技术问题,追踪了会话人工智能如何无法充分响应幼儿的情感需求,以及由于人工智能在由训练数据确定的预定义环境中操作而导致的自然语言处理的局限性。虽然会话式人工智能在识别模式和数据关联方面很熟练,但在面对非常规的语音模式、富有想象力的场景或儿童交流中典型的有趣的非字面语言时,它可能会出现问题。此外,社会偏见可能渗透到人工智能训练数据中,或影响会话人工智能的输出,可能会损害幼儿在安全、非歧视性环境中的权利。因此,这次讨论会强调了保护儿童和负责任的以儿童为中心的设计的道德必要性。它为幼儿教育和护理领域的对话式人工智能的政策、实践和批判性伦理反思提供了一套实际考虑,强调需要透明的沟通、持续的评估和强有力的护栏,以优先考虑儿童的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood
Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood (CIEC) is a peer-reviewed international research journal. The journal provides a forum for researchers and professionals who are exploring new and alternative perspectives in their work with young children (from birth to eight years of age) and their families. CIEC aims to present opportunities for scholars to highlight the ways in which the boundaries of early childhood studies and practice are expanding, and for readers to participate in the discussion of emerging issues, contradictions and possibilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信