Creating patients: how technology and measurement approaches are misused in diagnosis and convert healthy individuals into TMD patients

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Charles Greene, Daniele Manfredini, Richard Ohrbach
{"title":"Creating patients: how technology and measurement approaches are misused in diagnosis and convert healthy individuals into TMD patients","authors":"Charles Greene, Daniele Manfredini, Richard Ohrbach","doi":"10.3389/fdmed.2023.1183327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advances made in recent years regarding technological approaches to medical and dental diagnosis are impressive. However, while those tools, procedures, and instruments may produce an improved clinical diagnosis or discover a new disorder, they also can be misused and misinterpreted in various ways. In the field of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), the very nature of those conditions is similar to common orthopedic problems elsewhere in the body. Yet, beyond imaging of the affected areas, there have been few important new technological approaches to augment the traditional history and examination for a sufficient diagnosis of such problems. The traditional approach is exemplified by the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders which has high inter-examiner reliability and diagnostic validity; translations into over 20 languages allow for widespread use. In contrast and unfortunately, the TMD field is replete with a variety of so-called diagnostic instruments and procedures, which have not been tested for diagnostic validity; these instruments and procedures, through misuse, are capable of complicating a true diagnosis of patients who present with symptoms, while also creating new patients by finding so-called abnormalities in healthy subjects. This paper discusses those technological approaches and their misuse with respect to TMD diagnosis from a critical viewpoint, and the authors argue that there are significant risks for patients if their uncritical implementation becomes accepted and widespread. Therefore, dentists are encouraged to reject the proposed application of such technological approaches to diagnosis of the stomatognathic system.","PeriodicalId":73077,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in dental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in dental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2023.1183327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advances made in recent years regarding technological approaches to medical and dental diagnosis are impressive. However, while those tools, procedures, and instruments may produce an improved clinical diagnosis or discover a new disorder, they also can be misused and misinterpreted in various ways. In the field of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), the very nature of those conditions is similar to common orthopedic problems elsewhere in the body. Yet, beyond imaging of the affected areas, there have been few important new technological approaches to augment the traditional history and examination for a sufficient diagnosis of such problems. The traditional approach is exemplified by the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders which has high inter-examiner reliability and diagnostic validity; translations into over 20 languages allow for widespread use. In contrast and unfortunately, the TMD field is replete with a variety of so-called diagnostic instruments and procedures, which have not been tested for diagnostic validity; these instruments and procedures, through misuse, are capable of complicating a true diagnosis of patients who present with symptoms, while also creating new patients by finding so-called abnormalities in healthy subjects. This paper discusses those technological approaches and their misuse with respect to TMD diagnosis from a critical viewpoint, and the authors argue that there are significant risks for patients if their uncritical implementation becomes accepted and widespread. Therefore, dentists are encouraged to reject the proposed application of such technological approaches to diagnosis of the stomatognathic system.
创造患者:技术和测量方法如何在诊断中被滥用,并将健康个体转化为TMD患者
近年来在医疗和牙科诊断的技术方法方面取得的进展令人印象深刻。然而,虽然这些工具、程序和仪器可能会提高临床诊断水平或发现新的疾病,但它们也可能以各种方式被误用和误解。在颞下颌紊乱(TMDs)领域,这些疾病的本质与身体其他部位常见的骨科问题相似。然而,除了对受影响的区域进行成像之外,很少有重要的新技术方法来增强传统的历史和检查,以充分诊断这些问题。传统方法以《颞下颌疾病诊断标准》为例,具有较高的检查者间信度和诊断效度;翻译成20多种语言,允许广泛使用。相反,不幸的是,TMD领域充斥着各种所谓的诊断工具和程序,这些工具和程序尚未经过诊断有效性的测试;这些仪器和程序如果被误用,可能会使对出现症状的患者的真正诊断复杂化,同时也会通过在健康受试者中发现所谓的异常而产生新的患者。本文从批判的角度讨论了这些技术方法及其在TMD诊断中的误用,作者认为,如果不加批判的实施被接受和广泛应用,对患者有重大风险。因此,鼓励牙医拒绝应用这种技术方法来诊断口颌系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信