Dynamics of Prescribing Antithrombotic Therapy to Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Hospitalized for Myocardial Infarction in 2016–2021

Anastasiya A. Korshikova, Kristina G. Pereverzeva, Sergey S. Yakushin
{"title":"Dynamics of Prescribing Antithrombotic Therapy to Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Hospitalized for Myocardial Infarction in 2016–2021","authors":"Anastasiya A. Korshikova, Kristina G. Pereverzeva, Sergey S. Yakushin","doi":"10.17816/pavlovj109417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: At present, the issue of optimal antithrombotic therapy (ATT) in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been finally resolved, it requires an individual approach and is of interest for study.
 AIM: To study the dynamics of prescribing ATT to patients with AF of non-valvular etiology hospitalized in cardiology hospital in 20162021 for MI.
 MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 599 patients with MI and AF: in 20162017 104 patients, in 20182019 256 patients, in 20202021 239 patients. The median and interquartile range of age of patients hospitalized in 20162017 were 70 (61.0; 78.0) years, in 20182019 71 (65.0; 79.3) years, in 20202021 72 (65.0; 80.0) years, p = 0.09.
 RESULTS: In 20162017, 76.9% of patients with MI and AF were prescribed double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) from the first day of hospitalization; 16.3% of patients were prescribed therapy with oral anticoagulants (OACs), here, in 6.7% as part of triple ATT, in 8.7% as part of double ATT (OACs + antiplatelet agent), in 1.0% as monotherapy with OACs; in 3.8% monotherapy with an antiplatelet agent was prescribed; in 2.9% of cases ATT was not prescribed. In 20182019, DAPT was used in 37.9% of cases; therapy with OACs in 54.7% of cases: in 44.9% cases as part of triple ATT, in 9.8% as part of double therapy; in 7.4% of cases monotherapy with antiplatelet agent was prescribed. In 20202021, DAPT was prescribed in 15.9% of cases; therapy with OACs in 74.5%, of them in 59.8% triple АТТ, in 14.2% double АТТ; monotherapy with an antiplatelet agent - in 7.5%; in 1.7% АТТ was not prescribed.
 CONCLUSION: In the study, the frequency of prescription of triple ATT to patients with AF and MI in 20202021 increased 1.3 times as compared to 20182019, and 8.9 times as compared to 20162017 and made 59.8% (p 0.001 for all periods). The frequency of OAC also increased 1.3 times as compared to 20182019 and 4.6 times as compared to 20162017 and made 74.5% (p 0.001 for all periods). This dynamics of increase in the frequency of prescription of oral anticoagulants to patients with a combination of AF and MI should be considered a positive result of introduction of the Clinical recommendations in the treatment of cardiologic patients.","PeriodicalId":13184,"journal":{"name":"I.P.Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I.P.Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/pavlovj109417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: At present, the issue of optimal antithrombotic therapy (ATT) in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been finally resolved, it requires an individual approach and is of interest for study. AIM: To study the dynamics of prescribing ATT to patients with AF of non-valvular etiology hospitalized in cardiology hospital in 20162021 for MI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 599 patients with MI and AF: in 20162017 104 patients, in 20182019 256 patients, in 20202021 239 patients. The median and interquartile range of age of patients hospitalized in 20162017 were 70 (61.0; 78.0) years, in 20182019 71 (65.0; 79.3) years, in 20202021 72 (65.0; 80.0) years, p = 0.09. RESULTS: In 20162017, 76.9% of patients with MI and AF were prescribed double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) from the first day of hospitalization; 16.3% of patients were prescribed therapy with oral anticoagulants (OACs), here, in 6.7% as part of triple ATT, in 8.7% as part of double ATT (OACs + antiplatelet agent), in 1.0% as monotherapy with OACs; in 3.8% monotherapy with an antiplatelet agent was prescribed; in 2.9% of cases ATT was not prescribed. In 20182019, DAPT was used in 37.9% of cases; therapy with OACs in 54.7% of cases: in 44.9% cases as part of triple ATT, in 9.8% as part of double therapy; in 7.4% of cases monotherapy with antiplatelet agent was prescribed. In 20202021, DAPT was prescribed in 15.9% of cases; therapy with OACs in 74.5%, of them in 59.8% triple АТТ, in 14.2% double АТТ; monotherapy with an antiplatelet agent - in 7.5%; in 1.7% АТТ was not prescribed. CONCLUSION: In the study, the frequency of prescription of triple ATT to patients with AF and MI in 20202021 increased 1.3 times as compared to 20182019, and 8.9 times as compared to 20162017 and made 59.8% (p 0.001 for all periods). The frequency of OAC also increased 1.3 times as compared to 20182019 and 4.6 times as compared to 20162017 and made 74.5% (p 0.001 for all periods). This dynamics of increase in the frequency of prescription of oral anticoagulants to patients with a combination of AF and MI should be considered a positive result of introduction of the Clinical recommendations in the treatment of cardiologic patients.
2016-2021年因心肌梗死住院的房颤患者抗栓治疗的动态
导言:目前,心肌梗死(MI)合并心房颤动(AF)患者的最佳抗血栓治疗(ATT)问题尚未最终解决,这需要个体的方法,也是研究的兴趣所在。 目的:研究2016 - 2021年心内科住院非瓣膜性房颤患者因心肌梗死(MI)而开ATT的动态。材料与方法:该研究纳入599例心肌梗死和房颤患者:2016 - 2017年104例,2018 - 2019年256例,20202021年239例。2016 - 2017年住院患者年龄中位数和四分位数范围分别为70 (61.0;78.0)岁,20182019年71 (65.0;79.3岁,20202021年72岁(65.0;80.0)年,p = 0.09. 结果:2016 - 2017年,76.9%的心肌梗死和房颤患者从住院第一天起就接受了双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT);16.3%的患者接受口服抗凝剂(OACs)治疗,其中6.7%为三联抗凝剂治疗的一部分,8.7%为双联抗凝剂治疗的一部分(OACs +抗血小板药物),1.0%为OACs单药治疗;3.8%的患者采用抗血小板药物单药治疗;2.9%的病例没有开ATT。2018 - 2019年,使用DAPT的病例占37.9%;在54.7%的病例中使用OACs治疗:44.9%的病例作为三重ATT的一部分,9.8%的病例作为双重治疗的一部分;7.4%的病例采用抗血小板药物单药治疗。在2020 - 2021年,15.9%的病例开了DAPT;用OACs治疗者占74.5%,其中59.8%为三联АТТ, 14.2%为双联АТТ;抗血小板药物单药治疗- 7.5%;1.7% АТТ未开处方。 结论:本研究中,20202021年房颤合并心肌梗死患者使用三联ATT的频率比20182019年增加1.3倍,比20162017年增加8.9倍,占59.8%(各期p < 0.001)。OAC的频率也比2018 - 2019年增加了1.3倍,比2016 - 2017年增加了4.6倍,达到74.5%(所有时期p 0.001)。房颤和心肌梗死合并患者口服抗凝剂处方频率的增加应该被认为是引入临床建议治疗心脏病患者的积极结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信